Caster (1): Lancer
Avenger (1): Shielder
Ruler (1): Archer
Deadline: (expired on 2021-07-12 00:17:51)
Page Usage: 26/42
Why do you think this?In post 1350, Servant Lancer wrote:beast/avenger unlikely to be partners.
Who are you even voting right now? Or are you just implying that you'd like to eliminate Avenger?In post 1389, Servant Foreigner wrote:Me and saber were first to catch Moon, so you should follow me now.
Regarding my 'apathy,' just because my effort doesn't look like another player's effort, it doesn't mean I don't care. My schedule is such that I run into periods where it is very difficult or even impossible for me to post or pay attention to this game. But I'm still following along and contributing when I can.In post 1411, Servant Caster wrote:I think we just keep killing the people who don't seem to care because I think the scum team might be demotivated and barely playing.
You can pick which ones you would like to go after.
[Scummiest]: Rider
I don't see why not based on flipIn post 1415, Servant Berserker wrote:I don't think TA is going to yield much given Moon's flipIn post 1355, Servant Shielder wrote:Personally I feel that a traffic analyst claim should at least earn Saber a night to attempt actions
Why's that a particular point of concern for you?In post 1432, Servant Shielder wrote:I don't see why not based on flipIn post 1415, Servant Berserker wrote:I don't think TA is going to yield much given Moon's flipIn post 1355, Servant Shielder wrote:Personally I feel that a traffic analyst claim should at least earn Saber a night to attempt actions
I am concerned about saber's true name being revealed
I have a reason to believe that there is a redirection role in this game. Possibly even tied to revealing your name, since we don't know what that entails.In post 1433, Servant Alter Ego wrote:Why's that a particular point of concern for you?
Can you explain what makes Rider look "very, very good" off the Moon Cancer flip?In post 1435, Servant Alter Ego wrote:On review, I think Lancer and Rider both look very, very good off the Moon Cancer flip. Those two, plus Shielder and Archer, are my top town currently.
I find the positioning of Caster and Beast around the flip problematic. I understand the impulse to go after Avenger given the awkwardness of his stance around Moon but I'm feeling some reservations. I'm not actually sure scum pull such an attention-drawing move like that.
That feels a little bit of an unfair assessment? Just because the evaluation came "in the middle of a reads list" does not make it any less correct. The naked vote also goes entirely in conjunction with the read - sure, heIn post 1436, Servant Archer wrote:855 - covers the entire player base, does have moon as "Not a huge fan here." But, because it is in the middle of a reads list, it is not actually pushing moon
912 - Empty vote, votes Moon Cancer
The names in that list aren't in any particular order.In post 1436, Servant Archer wrote:But, because it is in the middle of a reads list, it is not actually pushing moon
likely off the initial moon cancer wagon (probably on foreigner or, less likely, on saber), but probably at least one on the second wagon because notscience had declared moon as the elim already. staying off entirely would probably be considered too suspicious.In post 1417, Servant Berserker wrote:Given this I take it you think scum should be off the Moon wagon, especially the initial one?In post 1367, Servant Alter Ego wrote:If I may be permitted a brief moment of self-indulgence: I told you so.
This is probably wise, NK15 hardly even bothered to explain himself after his first few posts, I feel like he went into shutdown mode the moment he got even the slightest bit of heat. Posts in the Townstumps Scum PT indicate he doesn't really put in effort.In post 1363, Servant Assassin wrote:I'll take a look at the relationship between Moon Caster and Saber, but I'm going to prudently treat Moon's reads as being WIFOM.
What's going to be more relevant is how people positioned themselves around Moon Cancer. Given the strength of his role I suspect that scumteam didn't want to lose him right away and that was why he was so difficult to flip.
I'm not going to immediately jump on Avenger for the hasty gladiate, that was a dumb and incredibly frustrating move but I'm not sure if scum would willingly draw so much attention to themself like that. I have a few other people in mind I want to take a look back at.
I don't remember but will go checkIn post 1426, Servant Rider wrote:Why do you think this?In post 1350, Servant Lancer wrote:beast/avenger unlikely to be partners.
still not very satisfied with caster recently.In post 1406, Servant Lancer wrote:ok and still no reaction to it?In post 1402, Servant Caster wrote:I was not online during the gladiateIn post 1350, Servant Lancer wrote:caster: reaction to the gladiate was nonexistent, used notscience's post as basis for vote and avoided saying literally anything else about the gladiate
when I logged on the gladiate was over.
also
this is literally during the gladiate:In post 1248, Servant Caster wrote:VOTE: Avenger
I think this is what Notsci would've wanted from the post he slipped on
Tldr, no i don't think it's particularly townie, i think that as a role itself its Neutral but how it was used is not a scum for scum trade and the scum flip there furtherIn post 1288, Servant Archer wrote:Do you think that having a gladiate ability is inherently townie? Do you think that the way Avenger used it was particularly townie? Were you town reading them before the gladiate?
And i would love to hear more about my sloy being scum but you moving away from it in favor for... (I would have to check) despite me being solid scum.In post 1294, Servant Lancer wrote:Or avenger either horribly misplayed or is scum but do go on, would love to hear more about thisIn post 1287, Servant Ruler wrote:Excuse me for my language but my lord and savior wouldnt approve of my rage.
At least one between lancer/alter is scum for their hard push against avenger.
Thats a horrible trade off but I dont see two scum going to bat for their buddy in this manner
My point was that Rider called several people scummy in that post, and I did not read it as leading a push towards Moon Cancer (I would even say that some of the other cases presented were stronger and more thought out --In post 1438, Servant Alter Ego wrote:That feels a little bit of an unfair assessment? Just because the evaluation came "in the middle of a reads list" does not make it any less correct. The naked vote also goes entirely in conjunction with the read - sure, heIn post 1436, Servant Archer wrote:855 - covers the entire player base, does have moon as "Not a huge fan here." But, because it is in the middle of a reads list, it is not actually pushing moon
912 - Empty vote, votes Moon Cancercouldhave voted elsewhere based on his previous stances, but hedidn't. (He also had 492 early, although that is admittedly a very slight point about the oddness of Moon scumreading me but voting with me, I give credit for them actually bothering to call it out). If they were not the most vocal or aggressive pusher of Moon Cancer, I still like them significantly better than those who were trying not to call attention to Moon Cancer at all.
I have literally never called you scum??? so I'm not sure why you're saying this???In post 1444, Servant Ruler wrote:Tldr, no i don't think it's particularly townie, i think that as a role itself its Neutral but how it was used is not a scum for scum trade and the scum flip there furtherIn post 1288, Servant Archer wrote:Do you think that having a gladiate ability is inherently townie? Do you think that the way Avenger used it was particularly townie? Were you town reading them before the gladiate?
On top of everything else, everything strongly points to Saber being truthful and all the push on saber is largely due to playstyle difference and i wouldnt be surprised if there was a bad faith argument being made in sabers direction
I thought saber was more null before the gladiate and I dont understand how they suddenly moved to hard scum by multiple people due to it.
And i would love to hear more about my sloy being scum but you moving away from it in favor for... (I would have to check) despite me being solid scum.In post 1294, Servant Lancer wrote:Or avenger either horribly misplayed or is scum but do go on, would love to hear more about thisIn post 1287, Servant Ruler wrote:Excuse me for my language but my lord and savior wouldnt approve of my rage.
At least one between lancer/alter is scum for their hard push against avenger.
Thats a horrible trade off but I dont see two scum going to bat for their buddy in this manner
I still don't understand why you were so angry at us for pushing Avenger when the gladiate was in effect? Can you explain that again?In post 1444, Servant Ruler wrote:Tldr, no i don't think it's particularly townie, i think that as a role itself its Neutral but how it was used is not a scum for scum trade and the scum flip there furtherIn post 1288, Servant Archer wrote:Do you think that having a gladiate ability is inherently townie? Do you think that the way Avenger used it was particularly townie? Were you town reading them before the gladiate?