In post 678, HockeyFan wrote:Fwiw I didnt think gpas reaction felt that unnatural but a gpa vote is smth I can get behind. Idk if you didnt quite see cows's soft defending of VFP in the last few posts(
479,
503) Partially
51.
To each their own. It just jumped out to me as a possibility.
You SR'ed Grandpa at time of argument, in 368 you say you think they're town, now you're fine with a potential vote on them - what's your case for them rn?
In post 678, HockeyFan wrote:So yea I do think cows hasn't necessarily hard defended VFP but certainly discredited the VFP push(that both me and Gpa made). It has indeed died down, and idk if thats cuz of Gpa's inactivity but just a thing to point out.
I get it. I just think VFP's being too deliberately laid back, and self-aware with it. It isn't fair to assume they're town because of this, but y'know... it just doesn't feel like he's bothered about being the elim here. On the other hand I'm not gonna deny hammering VFP either if he's the consensus wagon at EoD but my thoughts on them are the same. I'm aware you and GPA have pushed/voted him.
In post 678, HockeyFan wrote:You're putting too much stock into meta in your T3 read imo. Like this game specifically sure he has done smth, but any other person would be called scum by the way hes playing.
Understandable. I know I need many, MANY games with said person to even justify using meta effectively. I don't mind giving context to D1 reads even if they're kinda flawed & lackluster - something good may come from it, discussion-wise.
In post 678, HockeyFan wrote:Also can u explain to me how Bulge "not looking anywhere else" is scum? This game has had like 10 replacements so i really dont think thats an issue.
This I'll own up to - 'not looking anywhere else' was disingenuous of me to say, given they were waiting for slots to speak/replace out. I'll look back and let you know if my thoughts change on the slot.
Also I'm more null than town lean let's be honest - I've barely posted/interacted with anyone so.
Thanks, though.