Newbie 2071: The Sandwich Debate - End!
Forum rules
- fferyllt
-
fferyllt SheTitan of Trajectory
- fferyllt
She- Titan of Trajectory
- Titan of Trajectory
- Posts: 19412
- Joined: December 28, 2012
- Pronoun: She
- Location: Left Coast
Last edited by fferyllt on Thu Jul 22, 2021 4:26 am, edited 1 time in total.Amid the pressure of great events, a general principle gives no help.
On the path to becoming yourself, you'll need to choose alignment over validation from others, peace over addictive chaos, and being misunderstood over false acceptance. --TheHolisticPsychologistIdic- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
so now that i've covered all that ground, i can get into the meat of why i think it's hockeyfan. luckily, his ISO is full of mentions of T3, and i think they look quite bad for him:
Spoiler:
first real meaningful interaction here, hockey pressures T3 for not explaining his read, and T3 gives a very weak explanation of cows' thoughts being "too complex". somehow this mediocre explanation was enough to satisfy hockeyfan and make him suggest T3 is town. this is the kind of thing i find partnery - scum want to interact and look like they're putting pressure on each other, but they don't want to actually go too hard and get their partner eliminated, so they'll ask their teammates questions to seem curious, but not really care about the answers.
Spoiler:
then, when T3 starts getting some early scumreads, hockeyfan starts defending him, questioning why t3 is getting voted, saying he hasn't done anything scummy. it very much looks like he's trying to derail the wagon on t3 here.
Spoiler:
but, suddenly this all shifts, he decides he agrees with james's reasons for scumreading T3 and decides to townread him, and is suddenly attacking cows forhisdefense of t3. this is especially puzzling because suddenly despite claiming t3 hadn't been scummy earlier, suddenly hockeyfan is saying his early posts were scum logs. now, people can change their mind after a reread, of course. but it's kind of surprising to me that he got such a drastically different impression from a reread.
notably, in spite of his apparent agreement with james here, he doesn't really contribute to pressure on t3. instead, we get this exchange:
Spoiler:
that...is an absolutely terrible response from T3, and hockeyfan just sort of lets it slide by. this doesn'tlooklike someone who has T3 as potential scum.
Spoiler:
i bolded inside this reply to clasko for emphasis - he says a lot to chop down clasko's read on T3, saying he's put too much stock into meta, but, again, has hockey actually contributed meaningfully to pressure on T3 in any way? the answer is no. he's more interested in criticizing other people's reads of t3 than doing anything about him himself.
Spoiler:
so, again, a very soft question here, just asking T3 why he's trying to meta-read LLD. T3 gives an answer in 707, but hockey doesn't actually seem to care about it or follow up at all.
left unspoiled, because this is a super scummy quote, imo. hockey is trying to deflect from the scumreads on t3 again here, despite saying his posts were scummy, for some reason he wants to "shift away from it" because...it would be bad if both were eliminated and flipped town? the thinking here makes no sense especially given then he wasn't strongly townreading both players.In post 719, HockeyFan wrote:omg VFP u gonna talk about anything other than t3??
Also regarding this whole VFP/T3 thing thats happneing rn, I think we should shift away a little from it since atm 80% of the players think one of them is scum so if they're both town, uhh we're kinda fucked
of course, in spite of what he just said above, he decides to vote VFP instead of T3, despite seemingly suggesting several times he finds T3 scummy. instead he's voting the guy who was most strongly pushing T3. A vote that just...doesn't make sense if you believe T3 had a decent chance of being scum, which he did. it also reads like more partner defense, attacking someone for focusing on only one slot, when that slot just happens to be outed as scum this game.In post 742, HockeyFan wrote:nvm I think I have to vote one of t3/vfp now that we're close to deadline. I havent got a good read on the ppl that've replaced in, and everyone else hasnt done anythign scummy. i could vote gpa, but I think condemming one of T3/Vfp gets us some info.
Out of the 2, I think VFP is more scummy for only tunneling on T3 basically this entire game
VOTE: VFP
Spoiler:
he wants to seem like he's open to other options here, but he's not actually moving his vote to T3, in spite of suddenly agreeing that his behavior around claiming is scummy. again, remember, he's voting VFP herefor tunneling T3. it makes no sense whatsoever.free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
now, suddenly, the only reason he can give for T3-scum is "has not done anything towny"? and that's somehow one of the main elimination targets hockey is ok with voting?In post 836, HockeyFan wrote:
he has not done anythign towny. Also fwiw, the whole T3/VFP thing is only something i am going to pay attention on d1 most likely. I said in 719 that i think town should shift away from it a bit but since no one budged, i got back on it as we got closer to deadline. Stop assuming that I am going to sus ONLY these 2 the whole gmaeIn post 831, VFP wrote:What makes T3 on your radar as scum right now?
the classic scum move: fos your buddy, but push on a townie.In post 869, HockeyFan wrote:okay we have 1 hour til deadline, can the ppl who are voting james vote one of vfp/t3(preferably VFP) cuz that gives us alot more info @clasko, @LLD
now, the reads list here at the start of day 2 feels like a glaring red flag - Hockey apparently scumreads T3, but rather voting him, he votesIn post 884, HockeyFan wrote:Here are just some thoughts for me at start of d2
Grandpa- Honestly dont know how to read this slot. They have super towny logs(428,453,620)(after the tunnel on me but even then that was sorta town but I think this is something they can pull off as mafia so im paranoid of putting them as my top town atm
VFP- once VFP actually started making content, he was pre town. I am pretty hesitant to TR them since their push was *me* and I didnt really like it. This is ofc bias since it was against me, but yea i can put this slot in null/weak town
T3- still have no clue what this guy is doing but I think hes scum(mainly gut). I still think theres 1 scum between T3/VFP and we should have limmed one of them yday
Clakso- Town
LLD- Maybe I was town reading them just cuz they talked confidently, idk
Looker- Have no read
Lets pressure Looker
VOTE: LookerLooker, who he had "no read" on. That makes absolutely no sense from a town perspective. even if someone is lurky and not contributing much, there are other ways to pressure them than with a vote, and here it just looks like he wants an excuse to not actually vote T3 still despite professing to scumread him.
i mean, like...there's no reason he should "like" this post and i have no idea why he would.In post 913, HockeyFan wrote:
Ffs, why do I actually like this post from T3. is t3 actually town? What a world.In post 912, T3 wrote: Clasko - Conftown
Grandpa - Townread
Everyone else: everyone else
VFP's switch at the end of yesterday I is towny.
and yet he knows he's painted himself into it, he can't actually not scumread T3, he just has to make up excuses about how he "seems townier" to keep him alive. the whole thing looks extremely partnery in my view.In post 948, HockeyFan wrote:Looker and T3(This slot has become townier but still within my top 2 scum)free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
- Clasko
-
Clasko Goon
- Clasko
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 126
- Joined: March 20, 2021
Ugh I said I wasn't gonna do walls...
For the record, LLD, I would also choose Hockey over VFP-slot as the D3 elim. I can't see VFP/T3 team both pivoting onto claimed-VT James (who was townread by some - myself, hockey, cows, there may have been others) EoD, after VFP pushes for T3 for the majority of D1 (albeit a half-baked push with not much substance).In post 978, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Clasko, as confirmed town, now would be a great time for you to bounce ideas off me since you are gonna be 6 feet under tomorrow.
Towards beginning of D2, I was considering one of Grandpa/Looker as the team when I saw my result on T3, and had Hockey as 4th most likely partner of the 5, but that could have been my bias coming into play since I sort of townread them towards EoD1. I think LLD & peta make compelling arguments about Hockey voting VFP whilst keeping their FoS on T3 without actually pushing them. Looking back at Hockey's D1 ISO, I'm starting to believe it even more.
T3/Looker is a more scary combination because I can'treallymake a case for them being partners at all with the information provided.
Grandpa I'm less confident on, but I'm coming around to the idea that Grandpa maybe just busses T3 here instead of hard-defending them towards EoD, and continued to do so until I outed the result (926) - obviously scum!GPA has incentive to defend T3 since two co-ordinated mafia members have a more influence over a bunch of townies trying to figure things out for themselves, but I can't help but feel Grandpa bussing T3 would be the ideal strat and he didn't do that. I read individual scumminess from Grandpa at EoD for being absent/disengaged, and not choosing one of the two leading wagon at EoD and instead sticking to Looker despite them obviously never being the D1 elim, but they've picked up the pace D2.
As for LLD, I'm somewhat confident in her not being the partner - I agree with peta that her posts towards T3 don't look like scum theatre and she's done proactive things for town (admittedly they claim to do this as either align but it feels very helpful in the context of this game), and going back to Bulge for a moment, they were quick to townread T3 in a game where scum don't want to be associated with each other, and I don't think Bulge TR's a scum teammate for a reason based on 'gut' that will be most likely met with adversity and unwanted attention due to how people usually react to T3's play.
Take these with a pinch of salt because my experience playing mafia is sorely lacking, and recently skimming peta's posts may have influenced my own reads of people.
IMO (with benefit of hindsight) he was a loud town voice who was building a case for T3 scum, in a game with three, not-fully-established-into-the-game, replace-ins (in me, yourself & looker). I doubt it was PR-hunting anyway. I'll probably re-ISO cows to see if my above opinions change as we're heading towards EoD2 somewhat quickly.In post 968, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Here is a question: why does T3 shoot Cows?
I would be looking at this order for D3 elim if I were there:
Hockey > Looker>Grandpa > LLD>peta
Nice appeal to my paranoia there. D:In post 982, T3 wrote:I knew she should have roleblocked Clasko.- Clasko
-
Clasko Goon
- Clasko
- Looker
-
Looker Stenographer
- Looker
- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
thanks, nice to meet youIn post 1030, Clasko wrote:Also, yeah, welcome to the game petapan!free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
Spoiler:
so to start off, you have these early interactions between T3 and hockey, they're kind of playful, not much substance to them, although it's dangerous to read too much ito this sort of thing, some people just can't resist doing awkward little early game dances with their scumbuddies. i'm mainly quoting this here to provide context, though.
after that, he doesn't really mention hockeyfan at all until he drops this naked vote on him. from context, it's not really clear why he was voting hockeyfan here, he never explains it or pushes it all, and later he just hops off to vote VFP in 465. very little actual comment on hockeyfan here.
Spoiler:
this is another post, it's just a flat disagreement with something hockeyfan said, and nothing more. he's not really attacking hockeyfan over it, but also isn't really trying to convince hockeyfan of anything. it's justthere.
Spoiler:
then, later, we get this. hollow response to a question by hockeyfan, another vote, with the only justification being "cows push is a joke". it's not a serious vote. he isn't explaining it in a way that would be convincing to, well, anyone.
this part, in particular, is a red flag for me - him specifically choosing to nitpick LLD's townread on hockeyfan suggests he knows the read is wrong but is using it to attack her rather than pressure hockeyfan at all. this is a certain bad tendency a lot of people have as scum, when their partner is getting townread they'll express some doubt of the read to distance, thinking it'll make them look good.In post 691, T3 wrote:In post 688, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
I always try and control the game regardless of alignment.In post 687, T3 wrote:VOTE: lld
This feels similar to Yggdrasil when LLD was scum in the sense that she's trying to control the game. I disagree with her James read and she's trying to pocket hockey.
By the way, for the person who was talking about NAI things: This is an example of the proper time to use NAI. When someone is describing a playstyle uniformity.
I'm sure there's some minor differences in how I approach my game control between town and scum but I am also a player who actively changes her meta game to game on purpose so, it's a bit hard to describe I think.
Regardless, this is the proper use for NAI. Controlling a game is not an action done more frequently as scum than town.
Also, I'd call into question how exactly I'm controlling the game when I have yet to place a vote, and am currently catching up. In what way am I controlling a game when I'm not even pushing a wagon yet?
Can you please explain to me? I need to determine your sincerity in making this argument to read you.I also don't understand how you could have possibly got a read on Hockey from those first few pages.
UNVOTE: lld
I'll look at your meta.
now, i admittedly don't have the context for this, but at that point in time, my impression was hockeyfan was fairly townread. so what does T3-scum gain from expressing suspicion on a popular townread? i very much doubt he was trying to "widen the POE", as people sometimes say. there were easier targets for him to push, i feel like he would know his chances of getting hockey eliminated were low. and that's why this sort of thing is obvious distancing if you have enough experience to spot it - he'd be too afraid to question the townreads on a player who's actually town, because then he might get blowback for it. i see this kind of thing all the time, it's a major pet peeve of mine because IMO it's just sloppy play.
In post 707, T3 wrote:
1. That's wrong.In post 696, HockeyFan wrote:T3, what are u doing. You are attempting to read someone based off of meta alone. Why not do this wiith some of the other game? Why is LLD an exception?
2. This is a newbie.
3. LLD has a lot of meta I can look at.
we already know t3 is scum, of course, but the fact that he claims to be scumreading hockey but responds in such a safe way feels notable - it doesn't look like he's actually feeling pressured by hockey here. no concern, no worry that the questions he's asking might result in a scumread.In post 722, T3 wrote:I only flail as scum
Looker doesn't exist.
VFP is a consensus scumread.
LLD is kind of weirdly null.
cows is probably town.
hockey scum.
Grandpa and James I will not disclose.
again, a very weak attack on hockeyfan here - there's nothing to this read, just the lightest of suspicion at a time when he knows hockey can't get wagoned.In post 832, T3 wrote:
This was also my thought process, if you're town then it points to Hockey setting up mislims.In post 828, VFP wrote:Are you trying to chain up mis lims?
In post 915, T3 wrote:
What can I say?In post 913, HockeyFan wrote:
Ffs, why do I actually like this post from T3. is t3 actually town? What a world.In post 912, T3 wrote: Clasko - Conftown
Grandpa - Townread
Everyone else: everyone else
VFP's switch at the end of yesterday I is towny.
My PoE is Looker, you, and maybe LLD?
But because you're pushing looker you're probably not aligned.In post 920, T3 wrote:
To me, LLD immediately townreading you feels like pocketing. Then again, it was really obvious so it might be scumbag tring scumbag?In post 916, HockeyFan wrote:
I like it but I feel like we're both wrong on Tr'ing Gpa, but i am confident tring gpa for d2. so yeah we can pre much just lim Looker rn unless he becomes townyIn post 915, T3 wrote:
What can I say?In post 913, HockeyFan wrote:
Ffs, why do I actually like this post from T3. is t3 actually town? What a world.In post 912, T3 wrote: Clasko - Conftown
Grandpa - Townread
Everyone else: everyone else
VFP's switch at the end of yesterday I is towny.
My PoE is Looker, you, and maybe LLD?
But because you're pushing looker you're probably not aligned.
fast forward to today and we have this final set of interactions. i don't have a ton to say here, it looks teamed to me but i'm in pretty deep in my tunnel at this point, his responses to hockeyfan are an awkward "oh yeah you're in my POE" but also "LLD looked like she was pocketing you" which is pretty nonsensical. consistent pattern though, T3 calls hockeyfan scummy a bunch but never seriously attempts to get him eliminated. i think that, coupled with what i assume was the threadstate - not enough people seriously scumreading hockey for him to be a viable elimination - strongly points to this being distancing by T3. (if i'm wrong and more people were scumreading hockey, disregard that, but i still think this is significantly more likely to be a teammate of T3 than anyone else)In post 923, T3 wrote:Honestly I just didn't think of interactions around Hockey.free crypto- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
so that's about it from me in terms of analyzing the interactions and people's reads around T3. i can possibly do some speculation as to why cows was the NK, and pull meta on T3 to back up how he acts around partners, but other than that i don't feel like i have atonto contribute. i could give the game a full read, but it doesn't feel super necessary at this point because hockey just looks super obviously like T3's partner
other than that, i'm basically treating my stint in this game as a teaching role, so if any of the newbies have questions about my process here or any theory stuff, feel free to ask me anythingfree crypto- HockeyFan
-
HockeyFan Mafia Scum
- HockeyFan
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1370
- Joined: June 8, 2021
- Location: Ontario,CA
That's how POE works, no? I dont think VFP's slot is paired with T3 which once again leaves You/Grandpa/Looker. So from my pov, ONE of you 3 is paired with t3. I mentioned that i think Gpa is the towniest here sooo, for me the people paired with t3 are you/lookerIn post 1015, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
Right, so your logic is that scum T3 spent all yesterday discrediting me about Meta, then shoots cows, someone I called scum and was possibly in line to Eliminate via votes, then comes into today calling me into question AGAINIn post 1014, HockeyFan wrote:
Okay, so the only person I dont think T3 is paired with is VFP(peta in this case). This leaves Gpa/LLD/Looker. Out of these 3, Grandpa IS the towniest right now which means through POE, t3's partner is one of LLD/LookerIn post 1007, GrandpaMo wrote:
ok so now who u think t3 is mafia wit then ???In post 973, HockeyFan wrote:It doesnt change anything. LLD asked me who are the top 2 indivually scummy people(ppl i want to lim today). This does not mean they are PAIRED. Im just saying, T3 and Looker are my mafia reads and people and I want to lim(now that t3 is outed as mafia I MAY re-eval on looker, but no guarantees)
and then I as his partner call for a mass claim and organize it to get to this result
So if I was scum with T3 I would need to have
agreed to a kill on a target that I was okay to eliminate by vote and would probabyl have succeeded at doing
agreed to T3 doing a sabotage on my credibility as I replaced in and lessening my possible control over the game
and agreed to T3 doing it again today, only to call for a massclaim that increased our win percent by quite a bit?
I'd love for you to explain how T3 and I can be scum together.- HockeyFan
-
HockeyFan Mafia Scum
- HockeyFan
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1370
- Joined: June 8, 2021
- Location: Ontario,CA
1. "but, suddenly this all shifts, he decides he agrees with james's reasons for scumreading T3 and decides to townread him,"In post 1026, petapan wrote:so now that i've covered all that ground, i can get into the meat of why i think it's hockeyfan. luckily, his ISO is full of mentions of T3, and i think they look quite bad for him:
Spoiler:
first real meaningful interaction here, hockey pressures T3 for not explaining his read, and T3 gives a very weak explanation of cows' thoughts being "too complex". somehow this mediocre explanation was enough to satisfy hockeyfan and make him suggest T3 is town. this is the kind of thing i find partnery - scum want to interact and look like they're putting pressure on each other, but they don't want to actually go too hard and get their partner eliminated, so they'll ask their teammates questions to seem curious, but not really care about the answers.
Spoiler:
then, when T3 starts getting some early scumreads, hockeyfan starts defending him, questioning why t3 is getting voted, saying he hasn't done anything scummy. it very much looks like he's trying to derail the wagon on t3 here.
Spoiler:
but, suddenly this all shifts, he decides he agrees with james's reasons for scumreading T3 and decides to townread him, and is suddenly attacking cows forhisdefense of t3. this is especially puzzling because suddenly despite claiming t3 hadn't been scummy earlier, suddenly hockeyfan is saying his early posts were scum logs. now, people can change their mind after a reread, of course. but it's kind of surprising to me that he got such a drastically different impression from a reread.
notably, in spite of his apparent agreement with james here, he doesn't really contribute to pressure on t3. instead, we get this exchange:
Spoiler:
that...is an absolutely terrible response from T3, and hockeyfan just sort of lets it slide by. this doesn'tlooklike someone who has T3 as potential scum.
Spoiler:
i bolded inside this reply to clasko for emphasis - he says a lot to chop down clasko's read on T3, saying he's put too much stock into meta, but, again, has hockey actually contributed meaningfully to pressure on T3 in any way? the answer is no. he's more interested in criticizing other people's reads of t3 than doing anything about him himself.
Spoiler:
so, again, a very soft question here, just asking T3 why he's trying to meta-read LLD. T3 gives an answer in 707, but hockey doesn't actually seem to care about it or follow up at all.
left unspoiled, because this is a super scummy quote, imo. hockey is trying to deflect from the scumreads on t3 again here, despite saying his posts were scummy, for some reason he wants to "shift away from it" because...it would be bad if both were eliminated and flipped town? the thinking here makes no sense especially given then he wasn't strongly townreading both players.In post 719, HockeyFan wrote:omg VFP u gonna talk about anything other than t3??
Also regarding this whole VFP/T3 thing thats happneing rn, I think we should shift away a little from it since atm 80% of the players think one of them is scum so if they're both town, uhh we're kinda fucked
of course, in spite of what he just said above, he decides to vote VFP instead of T3, despite seemingly suggesting several times he finds T3 scummy. instead he's voting the guy who was most strongly pushing T3. A vote that just...doesn't make sense if you believe T3 had a decent chance of being scum, which he did. it also reads like more partner defense, attacking someone for focusing on only one slot, when that slot just happens to be outed as scum this game.In post 742, HockeyFan wrote:nvm I think I have to vote one of t3/vfp now that we're close to deadline. I havent got a good read on the ppl that've replaced in, and everyone else hasnt done anythign scummy. i could vote gpa, but I think condemming one of T3/Vfp gets us some info.
Out of the 2, I think VFP is more scummy for only tunneling on T3 basically this entire game
VOTE: VFP
Spoiler:
he wants to seem like he's open to other options here, but he's not actually moving his vote to T3, in spite of suddenly agreeing that his behavior around claiming is scummy. again, remember, he's voting VFP herefor tunneling T3. it makes no sense whatsoever.I think I espeically liked this point from James because it was the first real read someone had on T3. James could have easilly placed a random vote on T3 there but he didnt, and actually gave semi-decent reasoning
2. "attacking cows for his defense of t3"It felt very unnatrual and cows was one of the people who wanted to push T3 earlier in the day, so that sudden switch seemed odd to me
3. "for some reason he wants to "shift away from it". We had time in the day to look at other people, and its bad for town to get tunneld too much on certain people. I aslo voted one of T3/VFP in post 742(admittely i did choose wrong) because we were getting close to deadline and at that point, I dont think we were going to be able to vote anyone else
4.the only reason he can give for T3-scum is "has not done anything towny"?.I didnt have a scum case on anyone else at that time. So imo this was fine, because for the most of the other people I could find something that they did that was towny but for T3, i just couldnt..
5. " fos your buddy, but push on a townie."Yea sure, you can sus me for this, but I maintained the fact that I think one of t3/vfp are scum, So if VFP claimed PR or smth I would have voted T3
6. "there's no reason he should "like" this post".There was a bit of bias there since I pretty much had the exact thouhgts of that post
7. "he votes Looker, who he had "no read" on".I wanted to find one of t3's (possible) partners so I decided to pressure Looker to see what their reaction was, and tbh it hasnt been great
I know i didnt respond to everything in this wallpost, but I responded to things that caught my eye- HockeyFan
-
HockeyFan Mafia Scum
- HockeyFan
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1370
- Joined: June 8, 2021
- Location: Ontario,CA
- GrandpaMo
-
GrandpaMo Mafia Scum
- GrandpaMo
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: December 31, 2020
- Location: If you are reading this, then why did you read it in the first place?
In post 1018, petapan wrote:Spoiler:
okay, so, this is a massive unsorted quotedump from grandpamo about T3. while the progression here on a surface level is maybe not the best - i think this is probably not the approach grandpamo takes with a teammate, distancing early and pressuring him only to pull a full reversal and go into full-out defense when t3 was potentially a candidate for elimination. most players tend to take the path of least resistance and bus when their teammate is in danger. i also think, in more general terms, the way grandpamo is responding to t3 here looks authentic, for the most part. stuff like 269 and 573 feels tonally good, i lean toward that stuff being genuine.
i think 811 here though is a strong indicator of grandpa-town, though. the fact that t3 crumbed doctor specifically to grandpamo was very likely an attempt to pocket him and get him to stop scumreading t3. while it's super weird that grandpa did not somehow find him claiming vt instead scummy, i just don't think this is an interaction that happens between partners here. it's too specific and odd, and while that kind of thing can be faked, i find it incredibly unlikely they would try to do so in a newbie game, because it isvery unlikelymost players in the game would read into that sort of thing and see it as unaligned. i think it's the simpler answer: T3 didn't want grandpa pushing him, but didn't want to push back, so he fake-crumbed to try to escape the pressure and grandpa got pocketed by it.
omfg thank u . i forgot had this whole parania regarding t3 -- honestly that just stemmed from me saying that t3 was doing the same exact shit on how they read me and the people around me in the last scum game with them -- then they do the PR fake claim BS which made me instantly turn that scumread into a townread because they did that same thing in our last TOWN game with them, i think it was just a bar of t3 pocketing me. who knows, t3 played well regardless lol"With grandpa in the game the postcount goes up and up and up and up...." - T3- T3
-
T3 He/himJack of All Trades
- T3
He/him- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9478
- Joined: February 19, 2021
- Pronoun: He/him
The way you organized your first post felt like a pr looking for who to do the action on so I suggested we roleblock you, but my partner suggested someone else.In post 1029, Clasko wrote:Ugh I said I wasn't gonna do walls...
For the record, LLD, I would also choose Hockey over VFP-slot as the D3 elim. I can't see VFP/T3 team both pivoting onto claimed-VT James (who was townread by some - myself, hockey, cows, there may have been others) EoD, after VFP pushes for T3 for the majority of D1 (albeit a half-baked push with not much substance).In post 978, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Clasko, as confirmed town, now would be a great time for you to bounce ideas off me since you are gonna be 6 feet under tomorrow.
Towards beginning of D2, I was considering one of Grandpa/Looker as the team when I saw my result on T3, and had Hockey as 4th most likely partner of the 5, but that could have been my bias coming into play since I sort of townread them towards EoD1. I think LLD & peta make compelling arguments about Hockey voting VFP whilst keeping their FoS on T3 without actually pushing them. Looking back at Hockey's D1 ISO, I'm starting to believe it even more.
T3/Looker is a more scary combination because I can'treallymake a case for them being partners at all with the information provided.
Grandpa I'm less confident on, but I'm coming around to the idea that Grandpa maybe just busses T3 here instead of hard-defending them towards EoD, and continued to do so until I outed the result (926) - obviously scum!GPA has incentive to defend T3 since two co-ordinated mafia members have a more influence over a bunch of townies trying to figure things out for themselves, but I can't help but feel Grandpa bussing T3 would be the ideal strat and he didn't do that. I read individual scumminess from Grandpa at EoD for being absent/disengaged, and not choosing one of the two leading wagon at EoD and instead sticking to Looker despite them obviously never being the D1 elim, but they've picked up the pace D2.
As for LLD, I'm somewhat confident in her not being the partner - I agree with peta that her posts towards T3 don't look like scum theatre and she's done proactive things for town (admittedly they claim to do this as either align but it feels very helpful in the context of this game), and going back to Bulge for a moment, they were quick to townread T3 in a game where scum don't want to be associated with each other, and I don't think Bulge TR's a scum teammate for a reason based on 'gut' that will be most likely met with adversity and unwanted attention due to how people usually react to T3's play.
Take these with a pinch of salt because my experience playing mafia is sorely lacking, and recently skimming peta's posts may have influenced my own reads of people.
IMO (with benefit of hindsight) he was a loud town voice who was building a case for T3 scum, in a game with three, not-fully-established-into-the-game, replace-ins (in me, yourself & looker). I doubt it was PR-hunting anyway. I'll probably re-ISO cows to see if my above opinions change as we're heading towards EoD2 somewhat quickly.In post 968, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Here is a question: why does T3 shoot Cows?
I would be looking at this order for D3 elim if I were there:
Hockey > Looker>Grandpa > LLD>peta
Nice appeal to my paranoia there. D:In post 982, T3 wrote:I knew she should have roleblocked Clasko.- Clasko
-
Clasko Goon
- Clasko
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 126
- Joined: March 20, 2021
I'll have to make sure that doesn't become a tell of some kind in future...In post 1039, T3 wrote:The way you organized your first post felt like a pr looking for who to do the action on so I suggested we roleblock you, but my partner suggested someone else.- Clasko
-
Clasko Goon
- Clasko
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 126
- Joined: March 20, 2021
If you don't believe you're the correct elim come D3, do you have a preference between the two people you're suggesting? Can you give reasons?In post 1035, HockeyFan wrote:That's how POE works, no? I dont think VFP's slot is paired with T3 which once again leaves You/Grandpa/Looker. So from my pov, ONE of you 3 is paired with t3. I mentioned that i think Gpa is the towniest here sooo, for me the people paired with t3 are you/looker- Clasko
-
Clasko Goon
- Clasko
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 126
- Joined: March 20, 2021
Likewise.In post 1032, petapan wrote:thanks, nice to meet you
I think an immediate burning question I have, and... I don't know if it's the right one to ask, but:In post 1034, petapan wrote:other than that, i'm basically treating my stint in this game as a teaching role, so if any of the newbies have questions about my process here or any theory stuff, feel free to ask me anything
What should newbies do in the presence of the "meta" argument? Like, if player X accuses player Y of being scum due to meta (or if meta is part of the argument), does Player Z (newbie) need to go through Player Y's previous games? Or should they focus solely on the game they're in to determine whether Player Y is scum?
I'm of the opinion it doesn't need to be a factor for newbies until they've shared/read a significant amount of games with Player Y, which would take a longer amount of time than the game they're currently in, but I've seen it being brought up in a lot of recent newbie games, so my thoughts over meta are slightly hazy.- Looker
-
Looker Stenographer
- Looker
- Stenographer
- Stenographer
- Posts: 5161
- Joined: February 20, 2009
- HockeyFan
-
HockeyFan Mafia Scum
- HockeyFan
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1370
- Joined: June 8, 2021
- Location: Ontario,CA
I want Looker on d3. Looker has ben here, yes, but he hasnt really tried to progress game, kinda filler. Im liking LLD's logs more which is why I think Looker -> LLD wins us the game.In post 1041, Clasko wrote:
If you don't believe you're the correct elim come D3, do you have a preference between the two people you're suggesting? Can you give reasons?In post 1035, HockeyFan wrote:That's how POE works, no? I dont think VFP's slot is paired with T3 which once again leaves You/Grandpa/Looker. So from my pov, ONE of you 3 is paired with t3. I mentioned that i think Gpa is the towniest here sooo, for me the people paired with t3 are you/looker- petapan
-
petapan Don Corelone
- petapan
- Don Corelone
- Don Corelone
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: May 8, 2012
hmm, i'm an interesting person to ask on this because my opinion is different from most - i feel like "meta", at least the way most people on the site use it these days, is incredibly lazy and leads to bad reads. people will make statements like "playerIn post 1042, Clasko wrote:I think an immediate burning question I have, and... I don't know if it's the right one to ask, but:
What should newbies do in the presence of the "meta" argument? Like, if player X accuses player Y of being scum due to meta (or if meta is part of the argument), does Player Z (newbie) need to go through Player Y's previous games? Or should they focus solely on the game they're in to determine whether Player Y is scum?
I'm of the opinion it doesn't need to be a factor for newbies until they've shared/read a significant amount of games with Player Y, which would take a longer amount of time than the game they're currently in, but I've seen it being brought up in a lot of recent newbie games, so my thoughts over meta are slightly hazy.xsounds similar to gameAwhere they were town" or "playerxis completely different from gameBwhere they were town" (you can change "town" to "scum" in both of those examples, my usage here was arbitrary), and i think these are both fallacies. a player is going to usually sound similar across games because they arethe same person. unless they're sure there's a clear difference in their play as both alignments, that's no good. but by the same token, a person can behave differently in games for reasons entirely unrelated to their alignment, but just their mood and enthusiasm, or the strength of their reads that game. additionally, if you don't have an idea of the range of someone's scumplay, assuming they are town because they're acting different is dangerous - most people are going to try to change things up if there are several players in the game who have seen them as scum recently.
the argument becomes stronger if the player making the meta case has a strong familiarity with the person, but even then i think people will often be biased toward townreading their friends because of "meta". the thing i would post most stock is if someone is very familiar with a player and is very certain they're scum, because they're playing in a way they wouldn't as town. that type of read tends to be accurate, i think.
anyway, to actually answer your question, properly researching meta takes hours, and most non-crazy people do not have that kind of time. (unless the meta is simply "this person always acts like this", that is relatively quick to check). i think how much stock you put into a meta read in a game just has to depend on how much you trust the person who is giving it in game. in general, though, i would say your read on what is happening in your current game is more important than anything that happened in an old game.
definitely true for me, lmao. i don't have a ton else to addIn post 1043, Looker wrote:I think meta is why a lot of people create alts. Are we waiting for anything else?free crypto- T3
-
T3 He/himJack of All Trades
- T3
He/him- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9478
- Joined: February 19, 2021
- Pronoun: He/him
VOTE: lookerIn post 1043, Looker wrote:I think meta is why a lot of people create alts. Are we waiting for anything else?
Go away.- Looker
-
Looker Stenographer
- Looker
- Stenographer
- Stenographer
- Posts: 5161
- Joined: February 20, 2009
Progress the game? This is why I say this game is subjective - I don't see how beleaguering a point with walls of text (which can be easily misinterpreted and spun to agenda like most things on this site are) is progressing the game any more than stating your sentiments concisely and directly. Not saying I hate walls of text, just saying that most of these "cases" (i.e. HockeyFan saying I haven't tried to progress the game) come down to personality and playstyle differences. You end up with two jobs as town - find the mafia and win a popularity contest.- fferyllt
-
fferyllt SheTitan of Trajectory
- fferyllt
She- Titan of Trajectory
- Titan of Trajectory
- Posts: 19412
- Joined: December 28, 2012
- Pronoun: She
- Location: Left Coast
etAmid the pressure of great events, a general principle gives no help.
On the path to becoming yourself, you'll need to choose alignment over validation from others, peace over addictive chaos, and being misunderstood over false acceptance. --TheHolisticPsychologistIdic- fferyllt
-
fferyllt SheTitan of Trajectory
- fferyllt
She- Titan of Trajectory
- Titan of Trajectory
- Posts: 19412
- Joined: December 28, 2012
- Pronoun: She
- Location: Left Coast
allezAmid the pressure of great events, a general principle gives no help.
On the path to becoming yourself, you'll need to choose alignment over validation from others, peace over addictive chaos, and being misunderstood over false acceptance. --TheHolisticPsychologistIdic - fferyllt
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- fferyllt
- Looker
- T3
- petapan
- HockeyFan
- Looker
- Clasko
- Clasko
- Clasko
- T3
- GrandpaMo
- HockeyFan
- HockeyFan
- HockeyFan
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- Clasko
- petapan
- petapan
- petapan
- fferyllt