Yin needed to detonate ircher to remove a confirmed town voice from acting against the scum win condition and we were attempting to to speedyeet ircher.In post 3840, Amy Dunne wrote:How is this Occams Razor?In post 3838, Flea The Magician wrote:In post 3830, Amy Dunne wrote:It means that at least one - if not both of them are town, because we were meant to believe him because of Infinity/Nakata flips but why would he tell us the entire scumteam?In post 3827, Flea The Magician wrote:In post 3826, Amy Dunne wrote:Okay Flea I’ll bite. Your Chara/Tanner theory doesn’t make sense from a wifom perspective. Why? Because if Yin actually handed us the entire scumteam and we yeeted either of Tanner/Chara and either flipped scum, the surviving one would then be doomed and scum would obviously lose. That’s why your Tanner/Chara theory doesn’t make logical sense based off of Yin wifom.In post 3823, Flea The Magician wrote:And lets face it...
This is just you looking to affirm your towncred.
and I'll be blamed when you and tanner get ejected and win.occams
...
razor.
Yin knew about the reveal obviously which is why he’s the one that wound up detonating Ircher and not Nakata.We have been - through an extended process of elimination - given the solve to the game.Wiki wrote:Occam's razor, Ockham's razor, Ocham's razor, or the principle of parsimony or law of parsimony is the problem-solving principle that "entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity", sometimes inaccurately paraphrased as "the simplest explanation is usually the best one."
I have pointed out my own experiences with this lil dilemma.
and while town blames me for their incoming loss, I will laugh soundly at all of you.
I will not vote Tanner.
I will not vote Chara.
and I most certainly will not be dignified.
Now had Yin not actually detonated Ircher, your theory would be more believable
Yin absolutely had to detonate to meet the wincon for scum.