mini normal 2226; who won

T3 · Post Post #75 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 3:02 am

VOTE: Umlaut

Datisi · Post Post #76 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 3:08 am

In post 73, Datisi wrote:if flubber was reacting to something that wasn't rvs, then flubber's own post can't have been rvs either, right? so why are you suspecting umlaut for taking flubber's "rvs" interaction too seriously?

VOTE: t3

T3 · Post Post #77 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 3:17 am

In post 76, Datisi wrote:
In post 73, Datisi wrote:if flubber was reacting to something that wasn't rvs, then flubber's own post can't have been rvs either, right? so why are you suspecting umlaut for taking flubber's "rvs" interaction too seriously?
VOTE: t3

I already responded to this. Also, I think Titus's 'mindmeld' is towny.

T3 · Post Post #78 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 3:19 am

In post 73, Datisi wrote:if flubber was reacting to something that wasn't rvs, then flubber's own post can't have been rvs either, right? so why are you suspecting umlaut for taking flubber's "rvs" interaction too seriously?

Oh wait NVM I didn't respond to this.

Alchemist21 · Post Post #79 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 3:35 am

In post 54, Datisi wrote:another person that i kind of dislike right now is alchemist. something feels very scummy-nitpicky about his 39/41/43. like, it feels wrong that alch ia shading umlaut for not pressing seanzie while going for flubber just because umlaut didn't find coyness townie. umlaut found flubber's push to be suspicious so he went there, why would town!umlaut automatically have to be evaluating the pushee as well?

It may be nitpicky but I’m trying to understand Umlaut’s motivation here. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to expect him to have reacted to the slot literally everyone else was reacting to.

Alchemist21 · Post Post #80 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 3:41 am

In post 69, T3 wrote:
In post 68, Datisi wrote:while it's far from the first time i get some suspicion my way for my tone of speaking, i do kind of expect better from someone who's already played a few games with me.
Let me have bad reads in peace.

In post 73, Datisi wrote:if flubber was reacting to something that wasn't rvs, then flubber's own post can't have been rvs either, right? so why are you suspecting umlaut for taking flubber's "rvs" interaction too seriously?

+1 to this.

Alchemist21 · Post Post #81 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 3:44 am

In post 69, T3 wrote:
In post 68, Datisi wrote:while it's far from the first time i get some suspicion my way for my tone of speaking, i do kind of expect better from someone who's already played a few games with me.
Let me have bad reads in peace.

This post is in a weird place between “I know it’s a joke” and “dude wtf” for me. I haven’t liked any of T3’s posts so far.

VOTE: T3

Vulture · Post Post #82 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 3:46 am

How does one man who joins so many mafia games never learn.

T3 · Post Post #83 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 4:04 am

In post 81, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 69, T3 wrote:
In post 68, Datisi wrote:while it's far from the first time i get some suspicion my way for my tone of speaking, i do kind of expect better from someone who's already played a few games with me.
Let me have bad reads in peace.
This post is in a weird place between “I know it’s a joke” and “dude wtf” for me. I haven’t liked any of T3’s posts so far.

VOTE: T3

My post was like 50% a joke and also 50% this is also the "scummy I know how I play excuse"

T3 · Post Post #84 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 4:05 am

In post 80, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 69, T3 wrote:
In post 68, Datisi wrote:while it's far from the first time i get some suspicion my way for my tone of speaking, i do kind of expect better from someone who's already played a few games with me.
Let me have bad reads in peace.

In post 73, Datisi wrote:if flubber was reacting to something that wasn't rvs, then flubber's own post can't have been rvs either, right? so why are you suspecting umlaut for taking flubber's "rvs" interaction too seriously?
+1 to this.

You make a good point, I was probably being somewhat hyprocritical.

Alchemist21 · Post Post #85 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 4:21 am

In post 82, Vulture wrote:How does one man who joins so many mafia games never learn.

Who/what is this in reference to?

T3 · Post Post #86 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 5:05 am

In post 85, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 82, Vulture wrote:How does one man who joins so many mafia games never learn.
Who/what is this in reference to?

Probably me?

Seanzie · Post Post #87 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 5:09 am

In post 65, Vulture wrote:
In post 30, Flubbernugget wrote:You attack someone for attacking someone for...posting?

Chainsaw much?
This post is worse than the antagonizing post itself.

There’s not a lot more I have to add to this that hasn’t been said. Umlaut jumped on what we were all thinking.

Datisi felt different this game than the last one I played with him in a way I can’t word exactly, but noticed.

Vulture can have a townlean. They are looking at early interactions in a towny critical way. Not unfakable, but a good look. Also, the "I have a gut read but I can't articulate it" thing I think comes from town a lot more than scum.

Seanzie · Post Post #88 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 5:10 am

In post 78, T3 wrote:
In post 73, Datisi wrote:if flubber was reacting to something that wasn't rvs, then flubber's own post can't have been rvs either, right? so why are you suspecting umlaut for taking flubber's "rvs" interaction too seriously?
Oh wait NVM I didn't respond to this.

So uhh.... are you going to?

T3 · Post Post #89 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 5:15 am

In post 88, Seanzie wrote:
In post 78, T3 wrote:
In post 73, Datisi wrote:if flubber was reacting to something that wasn't rvs, then flubber's own post can't have been rvs either, right? so why are you suspecting umlaut for taking flubber's "rvs" interaction too seriously?
Oh wait NVM I didn't respond to this.
So uhh.... are you going to?

He's right.

Seanzie · Post Post #90 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 5:21 am

In post 89, T3 wrote:
In post 88, Seanzie wrote:
In post 78, T3 wrote:
In post 73, Datisi wrote:if flubber was reacting to something that wasn't rvs, then flubber's own post can't have been rvs either, right? so why are you suspecting umlaut for taking flubber's "rvs" interaction too seriously?
Oh wait NVM I didn't respond to this.
So uhh.... are you going to?
He's right.

And the followup question?

Datisi · Post Post #91 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 5:21 am

hate to be annoying, but... why are you voting umlaut then? >_>

T3 · Post Post #92 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 5:22 am

In post 91, Datisi wrote:hate to be annoying, but... why are you voting umlaut then? >_>

Oh, that. UNVOTE:

Datisi · Post Post #93 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 5:24 am

if that were almost anyone else, i'd start screaming for their head because they're obviously making it up as they go, but gut tells me this is not *completely* out of t3's townrange.

tris · Post Post #94 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 5:27 am

tris · Post Post #95 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 5:27 am

VC 1.02

Flubbernugget (3):

Umlaut 29, Lukewarm 50, ChaosOmega 71

Seanzie (2):

Gamma Emerald 13, Flubbernugget 26

T3 (2):

Datisi 76, Alchemist21 81

Umlaut (1):

Titus 74

Datisi (1):

Aristeia 9

Alchemist21 (1):

Seanzie 12

not voting:

MegAzumarill, Vulture, T3 92

with 13 alive it takes 7 to destroy.

deadline:

(expired on 2021-08-08 18:55:00)

tris · Post Post #96 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 5:29 am

i'm just going to leave that there. i don't know why i thought i was going to get a pagetop lol

Aristeia · Post Post #97 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 5:39 am

Hi Tris!

I voted for Flubber in 56

^,^

tris · Post Post #98 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 5:48 am

i literally

tris · Post Post #99 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 5:48 am

did not see that vote