VOTE: T3In post 447, T3 wrote:I don't see any reason why not to E-1 Flubber.
Policy til I am caught up.
Threatening to E-1 when a replacement comes in and denying town a chance to read me is scummy AF
VOTE: T3In post 447, T3 wrote:I don't see any reason why not to E-1 Flubber.
MonkaSIn post 443, T3 wrote:Hello MethBlade!
In the game you linked I was scum and did a skim just enough to seem Townie so as to get footing wet.In post 451, Lukewarm wrote:So, I was just like checking to see if Math has had any games with T3, or if I was going to have to explain that T3 is T3.
Found one, was looking to see how T3 T3 was that game -- he was very T3 btw
Spoiler:
So, like, yeah Mathblade has seen T3 do things like this.
But, also, I saw Toog's response to the situation, and found it quite funny
Spoiler:
Looks like as of the latest VC there’s two wagonsIn post 406, tris wrote:i did go on to get the pagetop after that tho. anyway; here's a topless vote count
and, MegAzumarill is v/la till Sunaday
Maybe my last post came across the wrong way.In post 454, MathBlade wrote:In the game you linked I was scum and did a skim just enough to seem Townie so as to get footing wet.
Soon as T3 claimed informed role cop he was getting shot n2 almost certainly. I reactioned a few times to confirm T3 rolecop then bam dead. I legit did not care what T3 was gonna say because he was gonna be dead.
In this one I am town and do not put up with shit like that. I want a chance to read and find scum.
I still prefer the Chaos flip, and feel like all of Dats, Ari, and Titus have voiced a scum read there, and honestly unsure why they all decided to jump to Meg over Chaos. But, I think that Meg also is looking like a scum flip, so not the end of the world I guess.In post 459, MathBlade wrote:My intent is more that independent of T3’s alignment he shouldn’t do it. That’s what policy means. It’s a vote that is policy until I catch up and I want to be able to do so.
What do you make of your chaos wagon and reactions or lack thereof?
as the first vote on meg, i will answer thisIn post 457, MathBlade wrote:Still reading tomorrow but those of you who consider yourself “champions” (however you define it) of the wagon please summarize your cases. Then I can use that in my catch-up tomorrow.
honestly idk. something about his response made me not want to vote him, and other slots currently have my attention, but i also wouldn't be *terribly* surprised if he flipped red.In post 460, Lukewarm wrote:I still prefer the Chaos flip, and feel like all of Dats, Ari, and Titus have voiced a scum read there, and honestly unsure why they all decided to jump to Meg over Chaos. But, I think that Meg also is looking like a scum flip, so not the end of the world I guess.In post 459, MathBlade wrote:My intent is more that independent of T3’s alignment he shouldn’t do it. That’s what policy means. It’s a vote that is policy until I catch up and I want to be able to do so.
What do you make of your chaos wagon and reactions or lack thereof?
I would move to Chaos too, I just have a preference for Flubber.In post 460, Lukewarm wrote:I still prefer the Chaos flip, and feel like all of Dats, Ari, and Titus have voiced a scum read there, and honestly unsure why they all decided to jump to Meg over Chaos. But, I think that Meg also is looking like a scum flip, so not the end of the world I guess.In post 459, MathBlade wrote:My intent is more that independent of T3’s alignment he shouldn’t do it. That’s what policy means. It’s a vote that is policy until I catch up and I want to be able to do so.
What do you make of your chaos wagon and reactions or lack thereof?
You're reading way too deep into this.In post 450, MathBlade wrote:VOTE: T3In post 447, T3 wrote:I don't see any reason why not to E-1 Flubber.
Policy til I am caught up.
Threatening to E-1 when a replacement comes in and denying town a chance to read me is scummy AF
Based on the post of votes in the VC it looks like a majority of votes on Flubber are RVS. By asking who is championing the wagon I can see if that theory is right or not. In other words who is willing to stake that their read is that important. (There’s also a corollary to this that follows but I don’t want to say it yet else it ruins the future expectations.)In post 463, Datisi wrote:hi mathblade!!
as the first vote on meg, i will answer thisIn post 457, MathBlade wrote:Still reading tomorrow but those of you who consider yourself “champions” (however you define it) of the wagon please summarize your cases. Then I can use that in my catch-up tomorrow.
i voted them because of post 284. they were v/la, they didn't post pretty much anything, and then they popped in with that post. it gave me the vibe of low-activity scum doing the ~bare minimum~ to appear townie, but not actually solving much of anything, because the post doesn't really say much of anything of value. i've had this "tell" come up in two recent games (can link if necessary) where there was a town player unable to post / low-posting, and they gave zero shits in appearing townie, and there was a scum player low-posting, and they gave an honest effort into doing to minimum to appear townie (i talked about this in 287 and 383).
now, i am fully aware it's possible that a townie vaguely skimmed the game and decided to throw something out, but. eh. to me, the act of "throwing something out after skimming" feels way more likely to come from scum who's more interested in keeping up the appearances of solving / not having the town turn on them while they're not posting, rather than town who's low on time and decided to throw *something* out to help, even though they admit to not being able to read closely. like, makes it feel like they're more concerned with looking like they're solving rather than actually correctly solving.
*however*, all of this may go in the garbage because flubber has been pretty scummy the whole game, and i was willing to write him off as loltownie, especially considering the wagon on him has been the one constant of this game so far. and then titus jumped in from the void to scream how flubber is locktown because she mindmelded with him on this one thing on like page 2 (420). this uh, made me paranoia a titus/flubber team (421), so would love your input there
(also while i'm here, something about flubber's "lol why we wagoning the v/la" post (425) rings very *very* wrong to me, but i can't consciously decide what it is, so idk.)
Why?In post 465, Alchemist21 wrote:I would move to Chaos too, I just have a preference for Flubber.In post 460, Lukewarm wrote:I still prefer the Chaos flip, and feel like all of Dats, Ari, and Titus have voiced a scum read there, and honestly unsure why they all decided to jump to Meg over Chaos. But, I think that Meg also is looking like a scum flip, so not the end of the world I guess.In post 459, MathBlade wrote:My intent is more that independent of T3’s alignment he shouldn’t do it. That’s what policy means. It’s a vote that is policy until I catch up and I want to be able to do so.
What do you make of your chaos wagon and reactions or lack thereof?
Agreed. I wish I could ask my prior self posted more than where. At this point it’s RVS, people get pushed for memes and typos and lolz.In post 29, Umlaut wrote:This is a really garbage reason for a push
VOTE: Flubbernugget
VOTE: Alchemist21[/b]In post 47, Alchemist21 wrote:No. He feels more like low-hanging fruit to me and I think both he and I were interested in seeing who else would push him for voting me. It was notable to me after the first 2 votes that the people voting Seanzie were people who know me, but 2 could just be a coincidence and I wanted to see if there would be a pattern and if anyone would try to pocket me along the way. I wanted to see how it played out a bit more but I think we're past that point now.
For what it's worth I don't think Umlaut was wrong on Flubber but there's another part of me that thinks Flubber could have been pushing Seanzie's bad reasoning in his own way and it strikes me as odd that Umlaut went for Flubber and didn't make any comment towards Seanzie.
What are your reads looking like so far?
This post here is disgusting. At this point this is Umlaut’s wagon on Flubber not Lukewarm’s.In post 53, Aristeia wrote:would you like me to join your wagon?In post 50, Lukewarm wrote:I think Seanzie's caginess is more likely to come from town then from scum.
I also think that Flubber's reaction to the caginess seems bad . I don't think that anyone would read Seanzie's post and actually think they were saying that posting=bad, and it was very obvious what he was actually saying.
VOTE: flubber
EbwopIn post 470, MathBlade wrote:VOTE: Alchemist21In post 47, Alchemist21 wrote:No. He feels more like low-hanging fruit to me and I think both he and I were interested in seeing who else would push him for voting me. It was notable to me after the first 2 votes that the people voting Seanzie were people who know me, but 2 could just be a coincidence and I wanted to see if there would be a pattern and if anyone would try to pocket me along the way. I wanted to see how it played out a bit more but I think we're past that point now.
For what it's worth I don't think Umlaut was wrong on Flubber but there's another part of me that thinks Flubber could have been pushing Seanzie's bad reasoning in his own way and it strikes me as odd that Umlaut went for Flubber and didn't make any comment towards Seanzie.
What are your reads looking like so far?
Someone doesn’t have to mention a second player during pushing a first if it would dilute their case.
It would be like me saying “oh my god tris is scum because blah blah blah”
Then someone saying “But you didn’t mention anything about (player tris is pushing)”
So? That’s cart before the horse.
Kinda thinking chaos + Alchemist here.
VOTE: Aristeia
Kinda getting chaos, alchemist, Aristeia vibes but I don’t think a hero solve on page two can be right.In post 71, ChaosOmega wrote:VOTE: Flubber
Do you get similar feelings from 26/30 by Flubber? If not, what makes them feel different?In post 57, T3 wrote:This post is really terrible. It feels like scum taking an RVS interaction way too seriously.In post 42, Umlaut wrote:Why should I make any kind of post toward Seanzie? I read the thread, I saw Flubber joining a convenient wagon for disingenuous reasons, I voted him.