Sadly, no.In post 1123, Lukewarm wrote:Can I get credit tooIn post 1113, House wrote:Credit to Gamma for the question.
Spoiler:
Scum is more likely to ask for basic evidence than town? I know you don't actually believe that when I've seen you catch scum by doing exactly that. This reads as extremely forced because saying you "hate" a post doesn't mean much and gives you room to give whatever interpretation you want. Pretty sure town!you is more straightforward than that.In post 1124, Lukewarm wrote:Mainly hated the -- "if anyone can quote the exact line" -- Seems more like a scum thought then a town one.In post 1122, Roden wrote:Interesting. So you acknowledge I posted something weird, and decide that's what required your focus instead of the question I asked you? Do you think it's scummy that I said something that's weird or did you specifically look for a reason to not answer the question?In post 1121, Lukewarm wrote:I have no idea what you could possibly mean here?In post 1109, Roden wrote:This justification for your vote doesn't feel townie at all for multiple reasons but I doubt you really want to get into why.
You think that I posted something scummy, and you don't think I would want to talk about it?????
If you think I did something scummy, shouldn't you want to put that in the thread, regardless of what I want?
Now, want to answer my question?
What do you mean you could be on board? You said he was scum in 305. The exact post you're asking House to get credit for.In post 1126, Lukewarm wrote:If you say so.
I could be on board for a T3 elim, but I am kind of wanting to put my vote back on Roden
This was a weird unvote, I almost never see town!Luke back down on a read, and trying to justify it by speculating about Masons doesn't come off as town.In post 579, Lukewarm wrote:I did not really think that they were your mason partner before, and mainly just thought that idea was just coming from T3.In post 567, House wrote:I think it's hilarious that Angel is speculated to be my partner, then all of a sudden there's this push to eliminate them.
If I was a more savvy person, I'd probably consider the person that started that push as scum for trying to eliminate a suspected Mason in order to fish out a claim.
But I'm not that nuanced.
But now seeing this post coming from you tho..
UNVOTE:
I think I was incredibly straight forward. You made a post that looked like a scum post. I voted you, and pointed directly to the post that made me feel that way.In post 1127, Roden wrote:Scum is more likely to ask for basic evidence than town? I know you don't actually believe that when I've seen you catch scum by doing exactly that. This reads as extremely forced because saying you "hate" a post doesn't mean much and gives you room to give whatever interpretation you want. Pretty sure town!you is more straightforward than that.
The answer to your question is that my statement was weird on purpose just to see reactions. But you kinda proved what I was saying right anyway because you focused on the part of my post that honestly didn't matter to avoid answering a really simple question that you don't seem like you were prepared to be asked.
Your second naked vote on me in a row. And still no case.
Like, I had other things that pinged me with your play this day phase, and at the time, the biggest thing in my mind was the self vote, and the fact that it lasted as long as it has, hence the fact that that takes up like 80% of that post.In post 1092, Lukewarm wrote:Lots and lots of ate this day phase.
Also, did not like his interaction with Dwlee. Hate post 940 in particular.
And then the self vote. Which is bad. But also, it happened 9 hours and 9 posts ago. So the fact that it is still there concerns me doubly so. Like, it is no longer a "flash of anger" self vote. It is a choice.
So he is either a townie who should be policy voted for not playing to win, or he is scum trying to make a play. Either way, I am happy to vote him as long as his self vote is in place. I only unvoted beacuse I did not want him to eliminated before you got a chance to check in
In post 1126, Lukewarm wrote:If you say so.
I could be on board for a T3 elim, but I am kind of wanting to put my vote back on Roden
In post 1128, Roden wrote:What do you mean you could be on board? You said he was scum in 305. The exact post you're asking House to get credit for.In post 1126, Lukewarm wrote:If you say so.
I could be on board for a T3 elim, but I am kind of wanting to put my vote back on Roden
So you reach for a vouch from House, say you might vote T3 even though you scum read him, then say you'd rather vote me anyway even though you haven't cased me?
I'll be interested in taking a harder look at Lukewarm on a red T3 flip.
Because you're nervous scum and you don't know how to play as fake town. Town!you doesn't wait for someone to ask you to explain very basic reads, you instead overexplain and push hard on everything you're thinking.In post 1132, Lukewarm wrote:I think I was incredibly straight forward. You made a post that looked like a scum post. I voted you, and pointed directly to the post that made me feel that way.In post 1127, Roden wrote:Scum is more likely to ask for basic evidence than town? I know you don't actually believe that when I've seen you catch scum by doing exactly that. This reads as extremely forced because saying you "hate" a post doesn't mean much and gives you room to give whatever interpretation you want. Pretty sure town!you is more straightforward than that.
The answer to your question is that my statement was weird on purpose just to see reactions. But you kinda proved what I was saying right anyway because you focused on the part of my post that honestly didn't matter to avoid answering a really simple question that you don't seem like you were prepared to be asked.
Please walk me through the reason why scum!luke would have pointed that post out in the first place? Wouldn't the tons of ATE, and my concerns about your self vote be reason enough to vote you?
Why would scum Luke ever just throw in a "Also I hate this post" and point to a post that I could not back up a reason for why I hated it. That is silly.
Particularly because he is waiting to see whether my case on T3 takes off before joining it.In post 1136, House wrote:I'll be interested in taking a harder look at Lukewarm on a red T3 flip.
The things that "ping" you also happened in the exact game you replaced into when you took my slot in Summertime. You've seen exactly how I play as town and I gave you my scum games to compare them to. So why are these things pinging you when you've seen me do it as town and haven't seen me do it as scum? Or did you not actually bother to meta me even though that's your absolute favorite thing to do as town?In post 1135, Lukewarm wrote:Like, I had other things that pinged me with your play this day phase, and at the time, the biggest thing in my mind was the self vote, and the fact that it lasted as long as it has, hence the fact that that takes up like 80% of that post.In post 1092, Lukewarm wrote:Lots and lots of ate this day phase.
Also, did not like his interaction with Dwlee. Hate post 940 in particular.
And then the self vote. Which is bad. But also, it happened 9 hours and 9 posts ago. So the fact that it is still there concerns me doubly so. Like, it is no longer a "flash of anger" self vote. It is a choice.
So he is either a townie who should be policy voted for not playing to win, or he is scum trying to make a play. Either way, I am happy to vote him as long as his self vote is in place. I only unvoted beacuse I did not want him to eliminated before you got a chance to check in
And you decide that I am scum because of a minor point, when I said "hate post 940 in particular?"
I don't know that I would describe myself as nerveous as scum, I currently have a 100% win rate there tyvm.In post 1137, Roden wrote:Because you're nervous scum and you don't know how to play as fake town. Town!you doesn't wait for someone to ask you to explain very basic reads, you instead overexplain and push hard on everything you're thinking.
Scum!you points out that post because I don't think you honestly care about AtE, you care more about logic, meta, and motives. Of all things you could point to to case me, you point at me asking for basic proof as evidence that I'm scum.
Interesting that you once again ignore the crux of what I was originally asking you though. Youreallydon't want to talk about, just like I said.
In post 1109, Roden wrote:So he is either a townie who should be policy voted for not playing to win, or he is scum trying to make a play. Either way, I am happy to vote him as long as his self vote is in place.
I think that this is probably a decent description of how I post / push once I hit 100% certainty on a scum read. Which is what you saw in our 1 and only game together before this, where I hard pushed T3 out Day 1In post 1137, Roden wrote:Town!you doesn't wait for someone to ask you to explain very basic reads, you instead overexplain and push hard on everything you're thinking.
I wouldn't say you've been confident, regardless of your alignment. You haven't been able to stick to a single scum read this game, let alone today where you've already flip flopped several times.In post 1140, Lukewarm wrote:I don't know that I would describe myself as nerveous as scum, I currently have a 100% win rate there tyvm.In post 1137, Roden wrote:Because you're nervous scum and you don't know how to play as fake town. Town!you doesn't wait for someone to ask you to explain very basic reads, you instead overexplain and push hard on everything you're thinking.
Scum!you points out that post because I don't think you honestly care about AtE, you care more about logic, meta, and motives. Of all things you could point to to case me, you point at me asking for basic proof as evidence that I'm scum.
Interesting that you once again ignore the crux of what I was originally asking you though. Youreallydon't want to talk about, just like I said.
As for the "Push hard on everything I am thinking," the main reason I did not go hard on you was because I was not trying to push you out with 1092. My expectation was that you would see that, and then stop self voting, and then we would move on
In post 1109, Roden wrote:So he is either a townie who should be policy voted for not playing to win, or he is scum trying to make a play. Either way, I am happy to vote him as long as his self vote is in place.
Explain, because if you think I should be policy elim'd for playing unconventionally and then pressuring someone who's taking an objectively opportunistic stance on my elimination, I think you look worse off.In post 1141, Lukewarm wrote:Your response to it, I don't think has been great though
In post 372, Lukewarm wrote:Looks like, you should join me on a T3 vote
