GREATIn post 972, Aristeia wrote:I think Prism's read of Vulture is accurate regardless of Prism's alignment.
SO MAYBE
ACTUALLY GO TO BAT FOR IT, OR LET ME WITHOUT CRYING
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST POOKY
GREATIn post 972, Aristeia wrote:I think Prism's read of Vulture is accurate regardless of Prism's alignment.
First off they’re probably not PookyIn post 975, Prism wrote:GREATIn post 972, Aristeia wrote:I think Prism's read of Vulture is accurate regardless of Prism's alignment.
SO MAYBE
ACTUALLY GO TO BAT FOR IT, OR LET ME WITHOUT CRYING
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST POOKY
In post 980, Titus wrote:@Ari, If you're wrong on Prism, what are your reads?
@Vulture, Can you give us a readwall? Intelligent comment? Why a sigh in 978?
I agree that I am working in abstracts. I don't really see the problem with doing so, though I realize it probably doesn't do a whole lot to get the point across. (i.e. Vulture wagon started up for the same reasons I had pushed them, but stated in an evidently clearer push by Titus.) I work in abstracts for a few reasons.In post 947, Datisi wrote:you're right, sorry i read this paragraph and then promptly deleted it from my brain for some reasonIn post 793, Lukewarm wrote:And even following that, it has taken questions for Meg to expound on things. And the way they have expounded, feels more like a conversation in abstraction then how they feel about each player they are talking about. Like, why each action could be read the way they read them in the read lists, as opposed to what they think about each player.
i think "conversation in abstraction" puts into words what i've been vaguely feeling about most of meg's posts but was struggling to express.
Autocorrect. People.In post 953, MathBlade wrote:What was that supposed to say?In post 922, T3 wrote:???? voting for Vulture.In post 919, Lukewarm wrote:In post 915, T3 wrote:I'm super disengaged but I think Prism v Ari is tvt.Who are you sheeping here?
Neither Prism nor Ari are voting for vulture atm.
You're voting the towniest one.In post 983, MathBlade wrote:Ugh I need another VC. Like it’s getting to the point where any of Chaos/Meg/Vulture are okay to me. They’re all in my PoE and I am getting to the point of I just want a flip to sort out people.
Pooky was also my first guess. Similar username and avatar to another Pooky alt plus online at the same time as Pooky.In post 977, MathBlade wrote:First off they’re probably not PookyIn post 975, Prism wrote:GREATIn post 972, Aristeia wrote:I think Prism's read of Vulture is accurate regardless of Prism's alignment.
SO MAYBE
ACTUALLY GO TO BAT FOR IT, OR LET ME WITHOUT CRYING
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST POOKY
Second off stop outing alts if you think that’s who they are
How confident are Meg/Alch scum to you Ari?
You literally quoted a post that says that you should not speculate on alts, and respond to it by speculating on the alt...In post 995, T3 wrote:Pooky was also my first guess. Similar username and avatar to another Pooky alt plus online at the same time as Pooky.In post 977, MathBlade wrote:First off they’re probably not PookyIn post 975, Prism wrote:GREATIn post 972, Aristeia wrote:I think Prism's read of Vulture is accurate regardless of Prism's alignment.
SO MAYBE
ACTUALLY GO TO BAT FOR IT, OR LET ME WITHOUT CRYING
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST POOKY
Second off stop outing alts if you think that’s who they are
How confident are Meg/Alch scum to you Ari?
I kinda feel like if you’re town you’re wrong based on the last few pages and if you’re scum you’re buddying me.In post 993, Titus wrote:You're voting the towniest one.In post 983, MathBlade wrote:Ugh I need another VC. Like it’s getting to the point where any of Chaos/Meg/Vulture are okay to me. They’re all in my PoE and I am getting to the point of I just want a flip to sort out people.