Thanks for giving me an excuse.In post 1024, Roden wrote:VOTE: Gamma
I want to go here for now. Something feels off with Nero/T3/Gamma and I wanna see if and how wagons shift with Gamma thrown in the mix.
VOTE: Gamma
Thanks for giving me an excuse.In post 1024, Roden wrote:VOTE: Gamma
I want to go here for now. Something feels off with Nero/T3/Gamma and I wanna see if and how wagons shift with Gamma thrown in the mix.
I'll admit my SRs aren't exactly congruent but I waasn't asked to make a full-effort readlist, just to outline where my thoughts areIn post 1019, Shrek wrote:your proposed four scum is literally just the top 3 wagons + a lurker who has done nothing memorable
when the entire thing feels like it's mired in shit and he should know better I think it is AIIn post 1020, DrippingGoofball wrote:Nero makes BS cases on me in every game, BS Nero cases aren't AI.In post 1000, Gamma Emerald wrote:This isn’t the caseIn post 924, Nero Cain wrote:bc I'm scum reading him he's still scum reading me.
I think your scum read on me is bs, which makes you scum
I don’t think you’d actually expect me to struggle to make reads as scum or believe I wouldn’t whiteknight as town
because it kinda slowly developed in my head as a thought and I never really had it turn solid until just recentlyIn post 1021, Nero Cain wrote:I don't think you ever said anything about this. Why not?In post 1013, Gamma Emerald wrote:it was probably a shitty attempt at distancing, based on how convoluted T3's thought process on you looks
I've been burnt with Nero bad town play before. I've also been burnt by Nero good scum play.In post 1016, LicketyQuickety wrote:You just voted T3 and I'm trying to figure how that factors into what you are saying here. A little help on your reasoning would be great.In post 1015, DrippingGoofball wrote:If you're looking for a wagon with a lot of resistance, look no further than Testarossa. If you need a reminder look at my scumputer play-by-play.
this was the post that turned on the lightbulb of "T3 might have been bussing Nero"In post 996, T3 wrote:That vote was me sheping Roden.In post 994, Nero Cain wrote:Dude I had made 3 posts when I voted me and then you later argued that I hadn't wall posted yet (0n like page 3 or w/e it was)In post 984, T3 wrote:Also, no it was definitely not too early to tell.
I'm guessing this was meant as a response to meIn post 1028, DrippingGoofball wrote:I've been burnt with Nero bad town play before. I've also been burnt by Nero good scum play.In post 1016, LicketyQuickety wrote:You just voted T3 and I'm trying to figure how that factors into what you are saying here. A little help on your reasoning would be great.In post 1015, DrippingGoofball wrote:If you're looking for a wagon with a lot of resistance, look no further than Testarossa. If you need a reminder look at my scumputer play-by-play.
And Nero would fend him off in the game thread?In post 1029, Gamma Emerald wrote:this was the post that turned on the lightbulb of "T3 might have been bussing Nero"In post 996, T3 wrote:That vote was me sheping Roden.In post 994, Nero Cain wrote:Dude I had made 3 posts when I voted me and then you later argued that I hadn't wall posted yet (0n like page 3 or w/e it was)In post 984, T3 wrote:Also, no it was definitely not too early to tell.
I've done plenty so farIn post 1019, Shrek wrote:your proposed four scum is literally just the top 3 wagons + a lurker who has done nothing memorable
okay this is straight-up bullshitIn post 1033, Save The Dragons wrote:I've done plenty so farIn post 1019, Shrek wrote:your proposed four scum is literally just the top 3 wagons + a lurker who has done nothing memorable
I started the glorious wagon on that one scumIn post 1036, Gamma Emerald wrote:okay this is straight-up bullshitIn post 1033, Save The Dragons wrote:I've done plenty so farIn post 1019, Shrek wrote:your proposed four scum is literally just the top 3 wagons + a lurker who has done nothing memorable
this is also a fucking lie, see: mini 2213In post 515, Save The Dragons wrote:i play very lazilyIn post 448, Shrek wrote:std - i think that StD has come off as kind of lazy tbh??? looking back through his iso he hasnt given anything of substance beyond three gut reads and explaining that they were gut reads, so i would like to see more from him on that.
I'll admit my SRs aren't exactly congruent but I waasn't asked to make a full-effort readlist, just to outline where my thoughts areIn post 1026, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 1019, Shrek wrote:your proposed four scum is literally just the top 3 wagons + a lurker who has done nothing memorable
Except I absolutely DID offer evidenceIn post 1041, Nero Cain wrote:But gamma you were agreeing with t3s meta "point" yes you worded it differently but by and large you were agreeing that this wasn't my town game. Not that you offered any evidence or anything
Wanna keep hurling shit that won't stick?In post 375, Gamma Emerald wrote:It doesn’t carry much of the energy I remember from LN 230 or 231In post 369, NorwegianboyEE wrote:What is scummy?In post 367, Gamma Emerald wrote:I feel like I’m more familiar with your relationship with Nero and I also think Nero is scummy
So I’m a bit concerned you’re trying attack Cheeky’s ability to read you two
Both of those games Nero felt very passionate, albeit in different aspects. Here he feels a bit deflated.
Really good question actually. I see you are living up the lazy card.In post 1037, Save The Dragons wrote:T3 who are your scumreads
Nero was a popular vote previously but seems to have fallen out of favorIn post 1043, Shrek wrote:I'll admit my SRs aren't exactly congruent but I waasn't asked to make a full-effort readlist, just to outline where my thoughts areIn post 1026, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 1019, Shrek wrote:your proposed four scum is literally just the top 3 wagons + a lurker who has done nothing memorable
how exactly does this prove that your reads arent just based on the consensus of what people have been saying
how so?In post 1045, Nero Cain wrote:That's not evidence lol