In post 1472, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Arcangel that sort of catchup is extremely annoying. I don't see the context and it's hard to understand if you actually have anything to say about the games currents circumstances other than making remarks about the first pages like an football commentator.
Sorry, it is such an inconvenience to you but I wanted to make up for the lost time. Early game reads will have some strong impressions on how we see a slot. Especially how people change their opinions and read over time. the early reads really contribute me how I sort town and scum reads.
In post 1418, Gamma Emerald wrote:I definitely think scum are sitting back and letting town fight amongst themselves
So something like StD/Arc/Testa/MegA feels possible
That also seems like pretty wishful thinking to assume all 4 scum are doing barely anything.
I think the townblock I noted early was at least decent though. Who do you think is scum in it?
We're falling through space, you and me, clinging to the skin of this tiny little world, and if we let go...That's who I am.
Post 836 is very confusing. IS there a town mason? How did i miss that?
Shrek catch post #839 looks unnecessarily long with big changes from this previous post.
Almost 50 is right about me about my play in sirus game. I was a lousy town player. I promoised myself to change that.
Not fan of Shrek opinion about policy eliminate inactivie players. If youre a townie, you should ask or pressure them to play but not policy eliminate them. It will hurt town becaust most inactive players turned out to be town.
I agree with Nero at 916
Isn't T3 lurking over pressure is his scum meta cheeky?
I have been a victim of nero scum play DGB but i feel he is probably town here!
STD - where are your reasons to indicate dwlee is town?
Gamma push on nero seems desperate.
there is been a hell of a change in the Shrek game from the first few pages to post #1125. I agree with them there about Mega, it's a slot we must look at.
I laughed so hard reading post # 1182 & 1184, the irony and truth is almost balancing.
Wow, that T3 post about Gamma, how could be he so sure? I wonder what does he know.
Roden - lean town
Almost50 - lean town
DrippingGoofball - lean town
Nero Cain - lean town
CheekyTeeky - probably town
LicketyQuickety - lean town but dropped to probably town
Dragon of the West - probably town
MegAzumarill - probably town
NorwegianboyEE - null
KittyTacky - Null
Save The Dragons - Null read
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
im curious as to how you read them as town considering he locktowned tessa (a scum read of yours) based on one post, asked unhelpful questions and refused to follow up or elaborate on them, and got into a feud with nero that lasted hundreds of pages only for his last post (2 days ago) to say that nero was distracting him from the game which i think reeks of self-conscious and paranoid scum. like just look at his iso and tell me hes trying to scumsort at all
In post 1482, Shrek wrote:im really confused as to how you can see both t3 and gamma as scum and then think that mega is town. really weird leaps in logic imo
Both lean scum to me. T3 more from meta and Gamma more from his gameplay.
And as for Mega, I did pay attention to your point about how his slot is now laid back after bringing a few questions to the table. I am not completely ignoring them. My town read is based on my earlier read on them which could change based on how they respond in the future.
I believe that this game needs to move. because a lot was said in a short time. My eyes are bleeding and don't want to listen to it anymore. I need some changes, it will bring a bit more clarity to the game.
How can my fued last for hundreds of pages when we aren't even at a hundred pages
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Still have a lot of posting to do to make it to 50k
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Not particularly. I guess I'm a "hyper poster" and I do troll/joke sometimes but I think my fluff to content is rather low
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
It's cute you think we wagoner gamma bc your your "meta case"
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
