This seems scummy.In post 378, Cephrir wrote:i might be a little mafia'd out today, i don't really have anything else right now and i didn't follow some of the multilayered arguments very closely
UNVOTE: roden
VOTE: cephrir
This seems scummy.In post 378, Cephrir wrote:i might be a little mafia'd out today, i don't really have anything else right now and i didn't follow some of the multilayered arguments very closely
I think you, as town, should be annoyed by me posting about the callers if you really think they are a distraction. I would expect that to color your read on me.In post 497, Galron wrote:What is my view of you? I'm not even sure I've got a read on you yet, but I do have a view. I'll tell you about it after you tell me what you think it is.In post 453, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Galron I think should have a different view of me based on his stance around the communications from the callers. He said they're a distraction and town should not abide a distraction taking hold of the thread
I believe the initial communications were a distraction, yes, put there for color. Whether the subsequent ones are relevant, no idea yet.
more townpostingIn post 502, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I think you, as town, should be annoyed by me posting about the callers if you really think they are a distraction. I would expect that to color your read on me.
This was for Gamma but got ninjadIn post 471, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:So what about her current play seems to be coming from town, but may actually be scummy play that you're not sure of yet?
drippinggoofball, i assume, who declared cephrir to be scumIn post 509, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Also Galron, in 490, who are you about to sheep? What is "the call on cephrir" and who made it? It seems from context it's meant to be me but I'm leaning town on him
Hey, I do what I gotta do.In post 502, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I think you, as town, should be annoyed by me posting about the callers if you really think they are a distraction. I would expect that to color your read on me.In post 497, Galron wrote:What is my view of you? I'm not even sure I've got a read on you yet, but I do have a view. I'll tell you about it after you tell me what you think it is.In post 453, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Galron I think should have a different view of me based on his stance around the communications from the callers. He said they're a distraction and town should not abide a distraction taking hold of the thread
I believe the initial communications were a distraction, yes, put there for color. Whether the subsequent ones are relevant, no idea yet.
Pedit: nice job Galron, you've stopped tweetie
I'm not really concerned with you posting stuff that I think is a distraction. You don't think it is. It's a difference in viewpoint. If you were posting fluff, I'd take issue with that, but you're not.In post 502, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I think you, as town, should be annoyed by me posting about the callers if you really think they are a distraction. I would expect that to color your read on me.In post 497, Galron wrote:What is my view of you? I'm not even sure I've got a read on you yet, but I do have a view. I'll tell you about it after you tell me what you think it is.In post 453, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Galron I think should have a different view of me based on his stance around the communications from the callers. He said they're a distraction and town should not abide a distraction taking hold of the thread
I believe the initial communications were a distraction, yes, put there for color. Whether the subsequent ones are relevant, no idea yet.
Pedit: nice job Galron, you've stopped tweetie
What rousseau said. DGB's vote.In post 509, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Also Galron, in 490, who are you about to sheep? What is "the call on cephrir" and who made it? It seems from context it's meant to be me but I'm leaning town on him
In post 496, Ydrasse wrote:why are you so in arms over dgb :<In post 490, Galron wrote:DGB? Seriously? I think the call on Cephrir is probably a good one, and I'm going to sheep it in a minute.In post 423, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:White knighting is used to counterattack skitter here. Essentially the same words could be used to TR me in a different context, where I'm not being pushed by skitter, and that's the distinction. It's because it's tied into your push on skitter who was pushing me at the time. You were using a defense of me in your push on skitter, rather than just explaining a TR on me. It's the context of the words that distinguishes the wk from the trIn post 414, Infinity 324 wrote:@ssbmIn post 400, Infinity 324 wrote:how do you distinguish between a white knight and just me townreading you
VOTE: infinity I want to do this or DGB right now in the interest of consolidating a bit
In post 484, Galron wrote:I don't understand this.In post 385, DrippingGoofball wrote:Excessively conciliatory.In post 349, Infinity 324 wrote:@ydrasse ah ok.
i still think it's a bit weak to townread skitt for. she may even think the exasperation benefits her, either because it makes her a bit harder to push, or because she thinks it'll be seen as a genuine response to pressure and less robotic. there's a few too many question marks here for me to put weight on your read, sorry
I am also cautiously townreading ydrasse. i'll make an effort to try to switch off of the skitt stuff for now, you can help by asking me about a specific read you're curious about
also, to people who aren't understanding the meta stuff, if you want me to try to summarize something, or engage you about something else, i'd be happy to.
In post 490, Galron wrote:DGB? Seriously? I think the call on Cephrir is probably a good one, and I'm going to sheep it in a minute.In post 423, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:White knighting is used to counterattack skitter here. Essentially the same words could be used to TR me in a different context, where I'm not being pushed by skitter, and that's the distinction. It's because it's tied into your push on skitter who was pushing me at the time. You were using a defense of me in your push on skitter, rather than just explaining a TR on me. It's the context of the words that distinguishes the wk from the trIn post 414, Infinity 324 wrote:@ssbmIn post 400, Infinity 324 wrote:how do you distinguish between a white knight and just me townreading you
VOTE: infinity I want to do this or DGB right now in the interest of consolidating a bit
this should be the first quote in aboveIn post 295, Galron wrote:Does a scum!Skitter spend this much effort trying to build a case on town on day 1 of a phase when it's likely any wagon there is likely to break up?
*Should say posting about stuff that I think is a distraction.In post 512, Galron wrote:I'm not really concerned with you posting stuff that I think is a distraction. You don't think it is. It's a difference in viewpoint. If you were posting fluff, I'd take issue with that, but you're not.In post 502, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I think you, as town, should be annoyed by me posting about the callers if you really think they are a distraction. I would expect that to color your read on me.In post 497, Galron wrote:What is my view of you? I'm not even sure I've got a read on you yet, but I do have a view. I'll tell you about it after you tell me what you think it is.In post 453, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Galron I think should have a different view of me based on his stance around the communications from the callers. He said they're a distraction and town should not abide a distraction taking hold of the thread
I believe the initial communications were a distraction, yes, put there for color. Whether the subsequent ones are relevant, no idea yet.
Pedit: nice job Galron, you've stopped tweetie
I forgot to poke the bear on my way through.In post 508, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i haven't read anything but i'm always down to sheep ydra
VOTE: Galron
Oh interesting to hear, I'm actually pretty tame in this gameIn post 517, Galron wrote:*Should say posting about stuff that I think is a distraction.In post 512, Galron wrote:I'm not really concerned with you posting stuff that I think is a distraction. You don't think it is. It's a difference in viewpoint. If you were posting fluff, I'd take issue with that, but you're not.In post 502, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I think you, as town, should be annoyed by me posting about the callers if you really think they are a distraction. I would expect that to color your read on me.In post 497, Galron wrote:What is my view of you? I'm not even sure I've got a read on you yet, but I do have a view. I'll tell you about it after you tell me what you think it is.In post 453, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Galron I think should have a different view of me based on his stance around the communications from the callers. He said they're a distraction and town should not abide a distraction taking hold of the thread
I believe the initial communications were a distraction, yes, put there for color. Whether the subsequent ones are relevant, no idea yet.
Pedit: nice job Galron, you've stopped tweetie
Anyway, my view of you is that you're just being aggressive and maybe personalizing things a bit too much, but that's not AI, and I can't tell where you are on the spectrum yet.
@ydrasseIn post 452, Infinity 324 wrote:hmm what did you get out of the conversation last night? cause you haven't really followed up since thenIn post 449, Ydrasse wrote:...!? i’m talking to you like most of my posts have been at you so one could assume my conversation
Are you prepared to defend Cephrir beign town?In post 510, rousseau wrote:drippinggoofball, i assume, who declared cephrir to be scumIn post 509, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Also Galron, in 490, who are you about to sheep? What is "the call on cephrir" and who made it? It seems from context it's meant to be me but I'm leaning town on him
i got a scumread from it and clearly as we’re still going back and forth we are following up?In post 520, Infinity 324 wrote:@ydrasseIn post 452, Infinity 324 wrote:hmm what did you get out of the conversation last night? cause you haven't really followed up since thenIn post 449, Ydrasse wrote:...!? i’m talking to you like most of my posts have been at you so one could assume my conversation
In post 402, Gamma Emerald wrote:May I ask about this?In post 389, DrippingGoofball wrote:Kyouko is my strongest town read.
FYII could see Cephrir!scum atm
In post 395, Ydrasse wrote:Skitter
Rousseau, Tetrina
Pooky, Cephrir
Gamma
Roden, DGB
Galron, Kyouko, House
Infinity
Care ti defend the Cephrir town reads? Maybe I'm wrong. Convince me.In post 398, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I like most of ydrasse's list, feels pretty close to my thoughts so far, at the very least it reinforces for me that she's town even if we're both wrong.
Mine goes:
Townread: Rousseau, Ydrasse
Townlean: Skitter, Cephrir,
Nulltown: Tetrina
Null: Gamma, Pooky, House
Nullscum: Roden, DGB
Scumlean: Galron
Scumread: Infinity