Well, I said I had a mild townread on T3; the post I quoted seems like a town thought that scum-T3 might not think to say.
Vague statements aren't good enough given you have virtually no content until now. How did you form this read? Hoping we fill in blanks after you suggest an answer is no bueno.In post 651, Dwlee99 wrote:I've decided upon return that if you read t3 ISO you will understand what I mean by sorty.
I can't really discuss this without knowing what you mean by guardians. Meta is crap. From my experience, T3 is more lighthearted as town. I feel I can meta him well, it just has little value.In post 580, The Limit Does Not Exist wrote:Hmm I think I can see T3 town. This doesn't feel like Guardians!T3.In post 511, T3 wrote:As of page 14 I've disagreed with all of Fairy's reads. .-.
-S
Why do you have an issue with dwlee here (which I think is a valid concern and am fine with the line of questioning) but you have no issue with mastina being entirely opaque about her scumread on bingle?In post 652, Titus wrote:Vague statements aren't good enough given you have virtually no content until now. How did you form this read? Hoping we fill in blanks after you suggest an answer is no bueno.In post 651, Dwlee99 wrote:I've decided upon return that if you read t3 ISO you will understand what I mean by sorty.
her reasoning wasn’t clear to me and in fact she has refused to elaborate even after multiple people asked. do you have a post where you saw her say this?In post 619, Titus wrote:mastina's reasoning is pretty clear. By claiming no potions, Bingle is free to shoot who he wants. I'm not sure I agree but it feels like town mastina.In post 531, The Limit Does Not Exist wrote:mastina still hasn't explained why bingle scumclaimed even after multiple people have asked so that's what I'm assuming it is, and it's a bullshit reason.
I'm saying mastina feels the no potion claim comes from scum. I obviously disagree as Bingle is not in my solve.In post 657, The Limit Does Not Exist wrote:Why do you have an issue with dwlee here (which I think is a valid concern and am fine with the line of questioning) but you have no issue with mastina being entirely opaque about her scumread on bingle?In post 652, Titus wrote:Vague statements aren't good enough given you have virtually no content until now. How did you form this read? Hoping we fill in blanks after you suggest an answer is no bueno.In post 651, Dwlee99 wrote:I've decided upon return that if you read t3 ISO you will understand what I mean by sorty.
her reasoning wasn’t clear to me and in fact she has refused to elaborate even after multiple people asked. do you have a post where you saw her say this?In post 619, Titus wrote:mastina's reasoning is pretty clear. By claiming no potions, Bingle is free to shoot who he wants. I'm not sure I agree but it feels like town mastina.In post 531, The Limit Does Not Exist wrote:mastina still hasn't explained why bingle scumclaimed even after multiple people have asked so that's what I'm assuming it is, and it's a bullshit reason.
are you saying that anyone who claims to have no potions must be scum? how is claiming no potions a scumclaim?
- lilith
so basically damned if I do, damned if I don’t. when I’m not posting because I have no spoons, I’m called out as “not trying hard enough” or “being absent.” but if I force myself to post when I have no spoons, you think it’s scummy because I’m upset that I feel like I’m being forced to post when I don’t have anything useful to say. cool. bye.In post 571, Green Cap Boys wrote:still not loving the s_s/lilith hydra, lilith's jump on page 22 in feels like scum annoyed that they're being pushed. and would love to see more Actual content from s_s.
She never said anything about the scumclaim being due to claiming no potions. Where did you get this from?In post 313, mastina wrote:Oh you have ingredients in your role PM?In post 101, Bingle wrote:I have at least one ingredient I wouldn’t mind giving to basically anyone. It is not mayonnaise.
VOTE: Bingle
Pretty sure that's a scumclaim from Bingle.
also please answer thisIn post 657, The Limit Does Not Exist wrote:Why do you have an issue with dwlee here (which I think is a valid concern and am fine with the line of questioning) but you have no issue with mastina being entirely opaque about her scumread on bingle?
His posts. When I've read them.In post 654, Titus wrote:Which ones? When?
It feels like Norway froze at my hero solve and Dwlee panicked. He drops his whole not caring persona after my solve and has given vague crap.
I'm going to check S's comment. I'm actively seeking evidence I am wrong to prevent tunneling.
the earlier popin was throwing a fit at mastina (which, while i 100% relate, is not that hard to fake) and expressed one (1) consensus read. the recent posting is... more of the same, hammering about mastina, except attacking titus over it. again, 100% relate there, but it's not enough.In post 663, The Limit Does Not Exist wrote:what is bad about my posting.
