First off you’re full of shit because I know you’ve seen me defend scum before via sheer length of experience but somehow StD gets an allowance for that while I don’t. Second,Nero Cain wrote:Also I'm not shading you 2. I legit think you are sus for town reading him. I have experience of std misreading scum so I'm not all that concerned especially when he's been sitting on scum all day. He's stubborn.
What was this “extremely accurate” tell?In post 1281, Dwlee99 wrote:I have an extremely accurate meta scum read on t3 right now, y'all should sheep me.
Did you read the posts that followed this? This was addressedIn post 1601, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: Dwlee99What was this “extremely accurate” tell?In post 1281, Dwlee99 wrote:I have an extremely accurate meta scum read on t3 right now, y'all should sheep me.
There is blood on your hands. Why shouldn't we speed lynch you?In post 1604, Dwlee99 wrote:Did you read the posts that followed this? This was addressedIn post 1601, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: Dwlee99What was this “extremely accurate” tell?In post 1281, Dwlee99 wrote:I have an extremely accurate meta scum read on t3 right now, y'all should sheep me.
Actually suck shit you bottom feeding bridge troll. No matter your alignment your play here is utterly despicable.In post 1605, Nero Cain wrote:Pretty ez to have correct reads when u know everyone's alignment
Weren't you the one most pushing for t3s limIn post 1607, LicketyQuickety wrote:There is blood on your hands. Why shouldn't we speed lynch you?In post 1604, Dwlee99 wrote:Did you read the posts that followed this? This was addressedIn post 1601, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: Dwlee99What was this “extremely accurate” tell?In post 1281, Dwlee99 wrote:I have an extremely accurate meta scum read on t3 right now, y'all should sheep me.
Meme?nIn post 1607, LicketyQuickety wrote:There is blood on your hands. Why shouldn't we speed lynch you?In post 1604, Dwlee99 wrote:Did you read the posts that followed this? This was addressedIn post 1601, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: Dwlee99What was this “extremely accurate” tell?In post 1281, Dwlee99 wrote:I have an extremely accurate meta scum read on t3 right now, y'all should sheep me.
If serious, here is why I should never be eliminated.
Yeah, until DGB hopped on it. Then I was against it. When T3 was put at |-2 I no longer liked the lynch. I also said Cheeky completely wiffed on the Town tells T3 was giving. I wasn't on T3 at EoD. My whole point to voting T3 was to see if they were going to lurk under pressure or not. When it was clear he wasn't lurking under pressure, I no longer wanted him lynched.In post 1612, Save The Dragons wrote:Weren't you the one most pushing for t3s limIn post 1607, LicketyQuickety wrote:There is blood on your hands. Why shouldn't we speed lynch you?In post 1604, Dwlee99 wrote:Did you read the posts that followed this? This was addressedIn post 1601, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: Dwlee99What was this “extremely accurate” tell?In post 1281, Dwlee99 wrote:I have an extremely accurate meta scum read on t3 right now, y'all should sheep me.
Sorry. Old habits die hard.
This is @ DwleeIn post 1619, Gamma Emerald wrote:Actually that’s one of the core reasons you SHOULD be eliminated
Your play feels like you’re trying very hard to pocket Nero
But look at my official pinIn post 1619, Gamma Emerald wrote:Actually that’s one of the core reasons you SHOULD be eliminated
Your play feels like you’re trying very hard to pocket Nero
You mean nothing to me John Snow.In post 1621, Dwlee99 wrote:But look at my official pinIn post 1619, Gamma Emerald wrote:Actually that’s one of the core reasons you SHOULD be eliminated
Your play feels like you’re trying very hard to pocket Nero
