Large Normal 235: Large Normal With No Multiball [Game Over]

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #2150 (ISO) » Sat Aug 14, 2021 1:55 pm

Game just busted wide open.

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #2151 (ISO) » Sat Aug 14, 2021 1:55 pm

In post 2148, Nero Cain wrote:How did cheeky know dgb still had a shot?

What even? I thought they were unlimited, not 1x. Nice shade though.

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #2152 (ISO) » Sat Aug 14, 2021 2:04 pm

In post 1848, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 1839, DrippingGoofball wrote:
In post 1833, Dwlee99 wrote:Are you also a checker? That isn't how NRG works on loyal.
I received no acknowledgement of my action, I thought the mod might have made a mistake, so I asked.

You remind me of scum!MathBlade casting doubt on my cop-guilty result in another game. Are you scum, Dwlee?
The mod can't tell you if your action succeeded, only if it was received.

I'm not "casting doubt" I'm getting clarification because the way you described it is not how it works. If you knew your action succeeded it goes to a hard guilty instead of a soft guilty (cause the action could have been roleblocked)

Still think this is dodgy.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #2153 (ISO) » Sat Aug 14, 2021 2:05 pm

Like, the point is that DGB is lying somewhere and that's Scummy af.

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #2154 (ISO) » Sat Aug 14, 2021 2:06 pm

In post 2153, LicketyQuickety wrote:Like, the point is that DGB is lying somewhere and that's Scummy af.

Why, are you actually scum? Also why did you want to vote AA9?

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #2155 (ISO) » Sat Aug 14, 2021 2:07 pm

A 1-shot in a large seems weak right?

Nero Cain · Post Post #2156 (ISO) » Sat Aug 14, 2021 2:08 pm

U think an unlimited town pr announces that they are a pr for f all reasoning?
The reasons I am skeptical is it's 1x so they don't have to give any results

And the "I have a gulity" but not claiming that gulity when you think it is one seems fake

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #2157 (ISO) » Sat Aug 14, 2021 2:11 pm

In post 2155, CheekyTeeky wrote:A 1-shot in a large seems weak right?

They claimed (to me) that they were 2-shot. And I said this already but I am a Backup Neighborizer with no stipulations on loyal OR x-shot.

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #2158 (ISO) » Sat Aug 14, 2021 2:11 pm

In post 2156, Nero Cain wrote:1x so they don't have to give any results

Yeah.

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #2159 (ISO) » Sat Aug 14, 2021 2:12 pm

In post 2157, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 2155, CheekyTeeky wrote:A 1-shot in a large seems weak right?
They claimed (to me) that they were 2-shot. And I said this already but I am a Backup Neighborizer with no stipulations on loyal OR x-shot.

Wait what?!

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #2160 (ISO) » Sat Aug 14, 2021 2:13 pm

In post 2159, CheekyTeeky wrote:
In post 2157, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 2155, CheekyTeeky wrote:A 1-shot in a large seems weak right?
They claimed (to me) that they were 2-shot. And I said this already but I am a Backup Neighborizer with no stipulations on loyal OR x-shot.
Wait what?!

In post 1973, LicketyQuickety wrote:There's one thing that has me questioning DGB's role. Not going to talk about it now, but I will at some point. Someone remind me when it's time to do that.

Shrek · Post Post #2161 (ISO) » Sat Aug 14, 2021 2:14 pm

im legit confused at this point as to wtf is going on. so are they a 1 shot or a 2 shot or unlimited?

Nero Cain · Post Post #2162 (ISO) » Sat Aug 14, 2021 2:14 pm

I think 1x have existed in a large but 1x is also an ez fake claim for scum to make. Not impossible that dbg fake claims in the thread and real claims to lq.

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #2163 (ISO) » Sat Aug 14, 2021 2:14 pm

Ok well that makes me locktown DGB, because clearly they were saying 1x so they wouldn't be NK. So... shit.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #2164 (ISO) » Sat Aug 14, 2021 2:14 pm

In post 2161, Shrek wrote:im legit confused at this point as to wtf is going on. so are they a 1 shot or a 2 shot or unlimited?

Exactly. Are they 1-shot, 2-shot, or unlimited? And are they Loyal or not?

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #2165 (ISO) » Sat Aug 14, 2021 2:15 pm

In post 2155, CheekyTeeky wrote:A 1-shot in a large seems weak right?

it's been happening quite a bit recently I think

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #2166 (ISO) » Sat Aug 14, 2021 2:15 pm

In post 2163, CheekyTeeky wrote:Ok well that makes me locktown DGB, because clearly they were saying 1x so they wouldn't be NK. So... shit.

Pretty much the worst take imaginable.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #2167 (ISO) » Sat Aug 14, 2021 2:16 pm

In post 2163, CheekyTeeky wrote:Ok well that makes me locktown DGB, because clearly they were saying 1x so they wouldn't be NK. So... shit.

yeah that's what I was thinking which is why I'm kinda pissed at LQ for fucking it up!

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #2168 (ISO) » Sat Aug 14, 2021 2:16 pm

No LQ you shouldn't have outed they had another shot. Also how did Nero know they had another shot? Are LQ/Nero scum? Wtf is going on...

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #2169 (ISO) » Sat Aug 14, 2021 2:17 pm

LQ can't be scum if DGB is town

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #2170 (ISO) » Sat Aug 14, 2021 2:17 pm

In post 2148, Nero Cain wrote:How did cheeky know dgb still had a shot?

?????

Nero Cain · Post Post #2171 (ISO) » Sat Aug 14, 2021 2:17 pm

Let's stay the course and kill in mega and Cyrus.

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #2172 (ISO) » Sat Aug 14, 2021 2:17 pm

In post 2169, Gamma Emerald wrote:LQ can't be scum if DGB is town

Why?

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #2173 (ISO) » Sat Aug 14, 2021 2:17 pm

Oh yeah... lol nvm.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #2174 (ISO) » Sat Aug 14, 2021 2:18 pm

In post 2167, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 2163, CheekyTeeky wrote:Ok well that makes me locktown DGB, because clearly they were saying 1x so they wouldn't be NK. So... shit.
yeah that's what I was thinking which is why I'm kinda pissed at LQ for fucking it up!

It doesn't mess up anything. Either DGB or I will be NKed. If I get NKed then DGB can still used their shot. Else, If DGB get's shot, they can still use their shot and I can see the results. We get another shot regardless if DGB is telling the truth.