Large Normal 235: Large Normal With No Multiball [Game Over]

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #3000 (ISO) » Wed Aug 18, 2021 11:10 am

DoTW is scum btw so they know DGB is town.

Yes Dwlee, but noone believes me. QQ

Roden · Post Post #3001 (ISO) » Wed Aug 18, 2021 11:10 am

In post 2992, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 2988, Roden wrote:
In post 2982, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 2981, CheekyTeeky wrote:Tbh I want Shrek to be town, but I still think both MegA/Shrek are scum.
If DGB is scum why would it purposely implicate itself as scum with the NK?
I don't. DGB has been Scummy since they brought up their claim. Now they are SURE that Shrek is Scum? Given all the other talk about Rolestopper and RB? It does not sound like DGB is interested in actually sorting Shrek but just wants to Elim them.
If you think DGB is scum then why do you want to vote Gamma?
Because I think the NK will implicate DGB.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #3002 (ISO) » Wed Aug 18, 2021 11:10 am

In post 2947, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 2944, Dragon of the West wrote:So DGB has a "guilty" in the sense that the person they targeted wasn't added to the PT. But they wouldn't know the difference between that and being blocked
Yeah, and DGB is still pushing the "Shrek is Scum" narrative that is really lacking an awareness of what has been said.

Shrek is fakeclaiming.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #3003 (ISO) » Wed Aug 18, 2021 11:10 am

In post 2996, Dwlee99 wrote:Wait, Cheeky got no result. Mega claims Cheeky visited DGB. Mega has to be lying about cheeky visiting or Cheeky is lying about no result, because if Cheeky was roleblocked she can't visit DGB and if DGB was rolestopped Mega couldn't see Cheeky visiting.

Cheeky no result just means DGB didn't actually use a NA.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #3004 (ISO) » Wed Aug 18, 2021 11:11 am

In post 3002, DrippingGoofball wrote:
In post 2947, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 2944, Dragon of the West wrote:So DGB has a "guilty" in the sense that the person they targeted wasn't added to the PT. But they wouldn't know the difference between that and being blocked
Yeah, and DGB is still pushing the "Shrek is Scum" narrative that is really lacking an awareness of what has been said.
Shrek is fakeclaiming.

Based on what?

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #3005 (ISO) » Wed Aug 18, 2021 11:11 am

In post 2998, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 2993, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 2991, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 2984, CheekyTeeky wrote:If DGB is scum we all owe it to it to nom them after the game.
Uh, no? Because we let NKs solve this. If I die (which is likely) then it paints DGB in a bad light. If Shrek dies, then it paints DGB in a bad light. If DGB dies, then it makes Shrek look bad. If Cheeky dies, it probably does nothing, but dissuades the conversation one more day.

On another note, I think the reason that DGB took my advice to target Shrek is because of who it clears if Shrek is Scum. I would have honestly expected Town!DGB to question my methods of those clears because they are behind closed doors.
or scum NK someone else outside of that mess and we learn basically nothing
my thinking is to burn the worst claim which atp is Shrek, followed by MegA
Which just gives TPR more time to use NA.

I don't wanna let a dodgy claim slide though, clearly scum have their fingers deep in the mech sauce so I'm not gonna trust until we can get those out

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #3006 (ISO) » Wed Aug 18, 2021 11:11 am

In post 3003, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 2996, Dwlee99 wrote:Wait, Cheeky got no result. Mega claims Cheeky visited DGB. Mega has to be lying about cheeky visiting or Cheeky is lying about no result, because if Cheeky was roleblocked she can't visit DGB and if DGB was rolestopped Mega couldn't see Cheeky visiting.
Cheeky no result just means DGB didn't actually use a NA.

I didn't get a no result, I got an action fail.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #3007 (ISO) » Wed Aug 18, 2021 11:12 am

In post 3003, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 2996, Dwlee99 wrote:Wait, Cheeky got no result. Mega claims Cheeky visited DGB. Mega has to be lying about cheeky visiting or Cheeky is lying about no result, because if Cheeky was roleblocked she can't visit DGB and if DGB was rolestopped Mega couldn't see Cheeky visiting.
Cheeky no result just means DGB didn't actually use a NA.

what the actual

FUCK

? Cheeky hasn't actually claimed any specifics about her role, how the fuck are you saying this?????????????

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #3008 (ISO) » Wed Aug 18, 2021 11:12 am

In post 3006, CheekyTeeky wrote:
In post 3003, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 2996, Dwlee99 wrote:Wait, Cheeky got no result. Mega claims Cheeky visited DGB. Mega has to be lying about cheeky visiting or Cheeky is lying about no result, because if Cheeky was roleblocked she can't visit DGB and if DGB was rolestopped Mega couldn't see Cheeky visiting.
Cheeky no result just means DGB didn't actually use a NA.
I didn't get a no result, I got an action fail.

Wait wtf I didn't claim what my role is?

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #3009 (ISO) » Wed Aug 18, 2021 11:13 am

Gamma: Inflating post count
DGB: shady claim stuff
Roden: literally backing up everything the above say
Nero: Not being reasonable like always.

Dwlee99 · Post Post #3010 (ISO) » Wed Aug 18, 2021 11:13 am

Yea what uhhh

Dwlee99 · Post Post #3011 (ISO) » Wed Aug 18, 2021 11:13 am

And cheeky you claimed you got a no result. I'm confused.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #3012 (ISO) » Wed Aug 18, 2021 11:13 am

In post 3006, CheekyTeeky wrote:
In post 3003, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 2996, Dwlee99 wrote:Wait, Cheeky got no result. Mega claims Cheeky visited DGB. Mega has to be lying about cheeky visiting or Cheeky is lying about no result, because if Cheeky was roleblocked she can't visit DGB and if DGB was rolestopped Mega couldn't see Cheeky visiting.
Cheeky no result just means DGB didn't actually use a NA.
I didn't get a no result, I got an action fail.

Okay, so then you were RB'd. Was that N1 or N2?

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #3013 (ISO) » Wed Aug 18, 2021 11:14 am

In post 3011, Dwlee99 wrote:And cheeky you claimed you got a no result. I'm confused.

Cheeky is just doing a failed gambit I think.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #3014 (ISO) » Wed Aug 18, 2021 11:14 am

In post 3009, LicketyQuickety wrote:Gamma: Inflating post count

lmfao you're still stuck on this moronic-ass point?

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #3015 (ISO) » Wed Aug 18, 2021 11:14 am

In post 3011, Dwlee99 wrote:And cheeky you claimed you got a no result. I'm confused.

My action failed that's why I thought DGB was ascetic. I might have said no result but I mean fail.

Dwlee99 · Post Post #3016 (ISO) » Wed Aug 18, 2021 11:15 am

Action failing is the same as no result I'm fivehead

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #3017 (ISO) » Wed Aug 18, 2021 11:15 am

In post 3012, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 3006, CheekyTeeky wrote:
In post 3003, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 2996, Dwlee99 wrote:Wait, Cheeky got no result. Mega claims Cheeky visited DGB. Mega has to be lying about cheeky visiting or Cheeky is lying about no result, because if Cheeky was roleblocked she can't visit DGB and if DGB was rolestopped Mega couldn't see Cheeky visiting.
Cheeky no result just means DGB didn't actually use a NA.
I didn't get a no result, I got an action fail.
Okay, so then you were RB'd. Was that N1 or N2?

N2 action fail.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #3018 (ISO) » Wed Aug 18, 2021 11:15 am

In post 3014, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 3009, LicketyQuickety wrote:Gamma: Inflating post count
lmfao you're still stuck on this moronic-ass point?

All these questions that lead nowhere says yes, yes I am.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #3019 (ISO) » Wed Aug 18, 2021 11:16 am

In post 3016, Dwlee99 wrote:Action failing is the same as no result I'm fivehead

It's literally not and we already discussed this.

Nero Cain · Post Post #3020 (ISO) » Wed Aug 18, 2021 11:17 am

oh i get it. When you said "pegs" you just meant calls. It doesn't have anything to do with accuracy.

but yeah, DGB isn't really calling and tunneling players as scum like in 233. I thought it could mean that DGB is scum but maybe DGB is actually trying to play like town as a semi-important pr.

Roden · Post Post #3021 (ISO) » Wed Aug 18, 2021 11:17 am

In post 3001, Roden wrote:
In post 2992, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 2988, Roden wrote:
In post 2982, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 2981, CheekyTeeky wrote:Tbh I want Shrek to be town, but I still think both MegA/Shrek are scum.
If DGB is scum why would it purposely implicate itself as scum with the NK?
I don't. DGB has been Scummy since they brought up their claim. Now they are SURE that Shrek is Scum? Given all the other talk about Rolestopper and RB? It does not sound like DGB is interested in actually sorting Shrek but just wants to Elim them.
If you think DGB is scum then why do you want to vote Gamma?
Because I think the NK will implicate DGB.

Oof my part got removed.

If DGB is scum then why would it purposely implicate itself with the NK?

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #3022 (ISO) » Wed Aug 18, 2021 11:17 am

In post 3018, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 3014, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 3009, LicketyQuickety wrote:Gamma: Inflating post count
lmfao you're still stuck on this moronic-ass point?
All these questions that lead nowhere says yes, yes I am.

I was trying to mitigate paranoia, imo those questions were very meaningful

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #3023 (ISO) » Wed Aug 18, 2021 11:17 am

In post 2947, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 2944, Dragon of the West wrote:So DGB has a "guilty" in the sense that the person they targeted wasn't added to the PT. But they wouldn't know the difference between that and being blocked
Yeah, and DGB is still pushing the "Shrek is Scum" narrative that is really lacking an awareness of what has been said.

In post 2988, Roden wrote:
In post 2982, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 2981, CheekyTeeky wrote:Tbh I want Shrek to be town, but I still think both MegA/Shrek are scum.
I don't. DGB has been Scummy since they brought up their claim. Now they are SURE that Shrek is Scum? Given all the other talk about Rolestopper and RB? It does not sound like DGB is interested in actually sorting Shrek but just wants to Elim them.
If you think DGB is scum then why do you want to vote Gamma?

.

If I didn't KNOW that LQ is town, I would totally vote there.

LQ should always be the N1 vig.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #3024 (ISO) » Wed Aug 18, 2021 11:17 am

In post 3017, CheekyTeeky wrote:
In post 3012, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 3006, CheekyTeeky wrote:
In post 3003, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 2996, Dwlee99 wrote:Wait, Cheeky got no result. Mega claims Cheeky visited DGB. Mega has to be lying about cheeky visiting or Cheeky is lying about no result, because if Cheeky was roleblocked she can't visit DGB and if DGB was rolestopped Mega couldn't see Cheeky visiting.
Cheeky no result just means DGB didn't actually use a NA.
I didn't get a no result, I got an action fail.
Okay, so then you were RB'd. Was that N1 or N2?
N2 action fail.

So you are SURE that implicates Mega? Or just sorta sure? You have to be 100% here or it means nothing.