yep, and i absolutely ran with "guys i was just covering for chaosIn post 3095, ChaosOmega wrote:Turns out both our naked votes were softing guilties, lol.
i realized he had a guilty i wanted to protect the power roles scum thought i was so good they actually tried to shoot me 
" all while i was hysterically laughing irl 
To be fair I thought you were the one with a guilty and was shading you.In post 3100, Datisi wrote:yep, and i absolutely ran with "guys i was just covering for chaosIn post 3095, ChaosOmega wrote:Turns out both our naked votes were softing guilties, lol.
if next scum flip is any traitor = my result from today means nothingIn post 3097, Gamma Emerald wrote:so assuming we flip another scum today:
traitor flip = math could be scum, nontraitor flip = math can only be scum traitor and in that case the game would be over
this might make my "create a townbin and vote outside of it" play even more viable?
i *think* the only way this is not true is if math is a mafia traitor neighbourizer who decided to holster for the whole game, but i kinda don't buy it?In post 3104, Datisi wrote:if next scum flip is a mafia neighbour = scum was most likely all in a hood together, math is cleared (if game not over)
And there would need to be 3 people in a PT at the start of the game, so it would have to be a mafia neighbor traitor neighborizer? Just gonna pretend this isn't possible and move on.In post 3106, Datisi wrote:i *think* the only way this is not true is if math is a mafia traitor neighbourizer who decided to holster for the whole game, but i kinda don't buy it?In post 3104, Datisi wrote:if next scum flip is a mafia neighbour = scum was most likely all in a hood together, math is cleared (if game not over)
and yes, i'm not gambiting for shits. ask koba what happened last time i did that.
Not a PTIn post 3108, ChaosOmega wrote:And there would need to be 3 people in a PT at the start of the game, so it would have to be a mafia neighbor traitor neighborizer? Just gonna pretend this isn't possible and move on.In post 3106, Datisi wrote:i *think* the only way this is not true is if math is a mafia traitor neighbourizer who decided to holster for the whole game, but i kinda don't buy it?In post 3104, Datisi wrote:if next scum flip is a mafia neighbour = scum was most likely all in a hood together, math is cleared (if game not over)
and yes, i'm not gambiting for shits. ask koba what happened last time i did that.
You do realize this gave cover and legitimacy to a possible scum Chaos right?In post 3100, Datisi wrote:yep, and i absolutely ran with "guys i was just covering for chaosIn post 3095, ChaosOmega wrote:Turns out both our naked votes were softing guilties, lol.
i could kinda see this being a thing, considering there's only one scum you could potentially guilty, and while i can guilty any of them, i effectively lose my pr after umlaut dies. that would make the rolecop the actually strong investigative, and he's odd-night. the jailkeeper cannot help follow the cop.In post 3091, ChaosOmega wrote:So assuming the setup is Mafia Doc + Mafia Neighbor + Mafia Traitor Neighbor, Datisi gets no useful results after Umlaut dies because they're both in a PT by themselves.
They could assume sheer luck.In post 3101, Datisi wrote:and considering the fact i was NOT shot again, makes me think chaos town, because surely a team with scum!chaos figures out i was talking out of my ass for the entirety of day 3?
Chaos said 3 people in A PT.In post 3112, Gamma Emerald wrote:what's the difference
yes, and?In post 3113, Titus wrote:You do realize this gave cover and legitimacy to a possible scum Chaos right?In post 3100, Datisi wrote:yep, and i absolutely ran with "guys i was just covering for chaosIn post 3095, ChaosOmega wrote:Turns out both our naked votes were softing guilties, lol.
Agreed it’s stupid and townsided and probably unwinnable for scum but if Chaos is town then it’s likely what happened. So yay autowin! Here we come.In post 3114, Datisi wrote:i could kinda see this being a thing, considering there's only one scum you could potentially guilty, and while i can guilty any of them, i effectively lose my pr after umlaut dies. that would make the rolecop the actually strong investigative, and he's odd-night. the jailkeeper cannot help follow the cop.In post 3091, ChaosOmega wrote:So assuming the setup is Mafia Doc + Mafia Neighbor + Mafia Traitor Neighbor, Datisi gets no useful results after Umlaut dies because they're both in a PT by themselves.
i can see this being a thing. it's very stupid and townsided but i can see it being a thing.
wondering if we should yeet chaos anyway, bc if he's town then both gamma and koba are conftowned, and titus and i can only be scum together (and don't even try it) so that's 4 townies going into night with 8 alive, which wouldn't be too bad, especially since then odds of it being something like math/n_m increases a lot.
3 people in a PT does not mean the same one necessarily.In post 3116, MathBlade wrote:Chaos said 3 people in A PT.In post 3112, Gamma Emerald wrote:what's the difference
Assuming the setup is as suggested
Could have started mafia doctor + Umlaut in first PT
Umlaut + traitor in second
Why did you holster night 2?In post 3118, Gamma Emerald wrote:atp I think I need to fullclaim in order to ensure the setup spec goes right, I'm really just 2 shot vs. odd night
idk if that's what we should do, I'm trying to run the associative mathIn post 3121, MathBlade wrote:VOTE: Chaos
I think we vote Chaos for the autowin scenario.
If he is town then we lock firm a bunch and if he is scum then we got a scum or traitor so yay!?