Mini Normal 2232 -ENDGAME

Andresvmb · Post Post #875 (ISO) » Mon Aug 23, 2021 7:27 am

In post 872, Titus wrote:There's got to be a mod error somewhere.

Occam’s razor points to GMo having made the error, not the Mod.

Enchant · Post Post #876 (ISO) » Mon Aug 23, 2021 7:29 am

It's very dumb (or genial) move for mafia.

ssbm_Kyouko · Post Post #877 (ISO) » Mon Aug 23, 2021 7:29 am

In post 35, GrandpaMo wrote:did i not post here dammit

This is a hood slip. He must have posted in his hood at day start and forgotten to post here is my guess

Titus · Post Post #878 (ISO) » Mon Aug 23, 2021 7:30 am

In post 875, Andresvmb wrote:
In post 872, Titus wrote:There's got to be a mod error somewhere.
Occam’s razor points to GMo having made the error, not the Mod.

Really? Why would he "error" an additional player in his hood? How does that happen?

GrandpaMo · Post Post #879 (ISO) » Mon Aug 23, 2021 7:31 am

Okay fine I retract. I am not in a hood.

Nor in masons. I made all that shit up just to get a reaction on titus , the replacement.

I thought DGB would have outted and claimed hoods before titus came in the thread because DGB was there right as soon as I claimed and titus being confused and stuff ruined the fake reaction thing.

I will retract now before I start acting anti-town in nature. There is no hoods, no nothing.

What did I get out of it? Andre // Nathan confirm themselves harder as town through the digestion and analysis. Enchant was so quick to vote out titus and believe titus is mafia without any escort to reasoning.

Now for people who think I could be scum. Do you think mafia really just claims a claimable spot? No. Mafia will not risk that situation and make themselves looks bad here. Especially knowing I probably would have received this backlash.

I think I am ready to vote now VOTE: Enchant

Andresvmb · Post Post #880 (ISO) » Mon Aug 23, 2021 7:31 am

In post 809, GrandpaMo wrote:Okay I hard claim masons with DGB - Can you confirm?

I’m going to be honest, looking back, I think this is Scum.

The first post declaring a Role limits the claim to DGB.

Enchant · Post Post #881 (ISO) » Mon Aug 23, 2021 7:32 am

Wtf, i didn't even vote Titus.

GrandpaMo · Post Post #882 (ISO) » Mon Aug 23, 2021 7:32 am

For the facts: I chose DGB because he ended up townreading me and I had no interactions with him in thread. So it have made the most viable sense as a friend, to claim hood with the person that would probably undewrstand what you are trying to do.

GrandpaMo · Post Post #883 (ISO) » Mon Aug 23, 2021 7:32 am

In post 881, Enchant wrote:Wtf, i didn't even vote Titus.

You thought they were scum.

Andresvmb · Post Post #884 (ISO) » Mon Aug 23, 2021 7:33 am

This play makes no sense, but seems meant to bury Titus in some fashion. I was deeply skeptical of the claim of Masons given the game, and the shift of role probably makes sense in that context.

Also, hard claiming and then lying about it have earned from me at least a hard vote.

VOTE: GrandpaMo

Titus · Post Post #885 (ISO) » Mon Aug 23, 2021 7:33 am

In post 879, GrandpaMo wrote:Andre // Nathan confirm themselves harder as town through the digestion and analysis.

If you're town, Andres trying to force the elimination between us two is scummy.

GrandpaMo · Post Post #886 (ISO) » Mon Aug 23, 2021 7:33 am

In post 877, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:
In post 35, GrandpaMo wrote:did i not post here dammit
This is a hood slip. He must have posted in his hood at day start and forgotten to post here is my guess

Another amazing point -- that I could have just claimed hood with DGB and let DGB confirm me out of knowing what I was doing and then use this to back me up.

GrandpaMo · Post Post #887 (ISO) » Mon Aug 23, 2021 7:34 am

In post 884, Andresvmb wrote:This play makes no sense, but seems meant to bury Titus in some fashion. I was deeply skeptical of the claim of Masons given the game, and the shift of role probably makes sense in that context.

Also, hard claiming and then lying about it have earned from me at least a hard vote.

VOTE: GrandpaMo

You have to realize it from a town mindset. Step back and try again then understand what I did what i did. You even admitted it being justified to bury Titus in some fashion.

Andresvmb · Post Post #888 (ISO) » Mon Aug 23, 2021 7:34 am

In post 885, Titus wrote:
In post 879, GrandpaMo wrote:Andre // Nathan confirm themselves harder as town through the digestion and analysis.
If you're town, Andres trying to force the elimination between us two is scummy.

How? I’m seeing literally contradicting claims. This reaction is literally silly.

Nathann · Post Post #889 (ISO) » Mon Aug 23, 2021 7:34 am

Fuck me, now I actually think GrandpaMo is Townie for that. Though the *does a thing* > "Mafia wouldn't do what I just did!" sequence is really starting to get on my nerves.

ssbm_Kyouko · Post Post #890 (ISO) » Mon Aug 23, 2021 7:34 am

Hmmmmmmm

GrandpaMo · Post Post #891 (ISO) » Mon Aug 23, 2021 7:35 am

In post 885, Titus wrote:
In post 879, GrandpaMo wrote:Andre // Nathan confirm themselves harder as town through the digestion and analysis.
If you're town, Andres trying to force the elimination between us two is scummy.

It is? Can you explain how? I thought this was when he thought we were in a hood.

Ythan · Post Post #892 (ISO) » Mon Aug 23, 2021 7:35 am

In post 834, Nathann wrote:If the Mafia doesn't have Daytalk without an Encryptor, the Neighbourhood shouldn't have it either. I wanna figure out what is happening and whether someone is screwing up their fake claim.

Off the top of my head I don't think this speculation they neighbors require an encryptor for day talk is correct. I think that specifically enables the mafia to communicate. And the rule about how the rules have to say if mafia can talk without an encryptor, I'm pretty sure that's also specific to the mafia.

Andresvmb · Post Post #893 (ISO) » Mon Aug 23, 2021 7:35 am

In post 887, GrandpaMo wrote:You have to realize it from a town mindset. Step back and try again then understand what I did what i did. You even admitted it being justified to bury Titus in some fashion.

You lied while claiming a Role to bury a player you Scum Read. For reasons I’m not going to get into, I’m having a massive allergic reaction to it.

GrandpaMo · Post Post #894 (ISO) » Mon Aug 23, 2021 7:36 am

In post 889, Nathann wrote:Fuck me, now I actually think GrandpaMo is Townie for that. Though the *does a thing* > "Mafia wouldn't do what I just did!" sequence is really starting to get on my nerves.

I explained why mafia doesn't do that. It's not like I didn't explain it and just blantly said mafia wouldn't do this. I explained why not. And I realized I use a lot of wifom as town lol. (knowing my meta)

ssbm_Kyouko · Post Post #895 (ISO) » Mon Aug 23, 2021 7:36 am

Let's kill kazyan

VOTE: Kazyan

Pedit: it's okay if you wanna bring it up Andre's lmao

Enchant · Post Post #896 (ISO) » Mon Aug 23, 2021 7:36 am

In post 883, GrandpaMo wrote:
In post 881, Enchant wrote:Wtf, i didn't even vote Titus.
You thought they were scum.

No, my question was "So he is mafia because he is voting your townread?"

Because it's cringe reason on my opinion.

Titus · Post Post #897 (ISO) » Mon Aug 23, 2021 7:36 am

In post 834, Nathann wrote:If the Mafia doesn't have Daytalk without an Encryptor, the Neighbourhood shouldn't have it either. I wanna figure out what is happening and whether someone is screwing up their fake claim.

I was in a normal where this supposition was violated. It almost cost us the game as scum.

Andresvmb · Post Post #898 (ISO) » Mon Aug 23, 2021 7:37 am

In post 895, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Let's kill kazyan

VOTE: Kazyan

Pedit: it's okay if you wanna bring it up Andre's lmao

No I really don’t want to open that back up again.

Nathann · Post Post #899 (ISO) » Mon Aug 23, 2021 7:37 am

In post 892, Ythan wrote:
In post 834, Nathann wrote:If the Mafia doesn't have Daytalk without an Encryptor, the Neighbourhood shouldn't have it either. I wanna figure out what is happening and whether someone is screwing up their fake claim.
Off the top of my head I don't think this speculation they neighbors require an encryptor for day talk is correct. I think that specifically enables the mafia to communicate. And the rule about how the rules have to say if mafia can talk without an encryptor, I'm pretty sure that's also specific to the mafia.

No.

Encryptor enables Daytalk in any Private Topic they're in, not just the Scumchat. And Daytalk is either global (all PTs have it without an Encryptor) or it isn't (nobody has it), it can't be Mafia-specific.