In post 418, House wrote:LolIn post 416, Thor Ragnarok wrote:VOTE: Gamma
House, why did you move away from your main on Wake? I thought your playstyle there was quite smooth and buttery
House is not Wake.
In post 418, House wrote:LolIn post 416, Thor Ragnarok wrote:VOTE: Gamma
House, why did you move away from your main on Wake? I thought your playstyle there was quite smooth and buttery
2 scum blundering into competing wagons on d1?In post 448, Bee wrote:What's the principle?In post 445, House wrote:I was toying with the possibility that Manatee & Enchant might both be scum during my catch-up, but ultimately dismissed it as being unlikely on general principle.In post 440, Titus wrote:You seem to have a problem with the Enchant wagon.In post 341, ManateeGal wrote:i dont know what youre trying to get at hereIn post 338, Titus wrote:Why is it fine? What's the problem with pushing awkward, low content slots?In post 331, ManateeGal wrote:is there a basis for the enchant wagon im missing?
mine seems to be based off of lack of content or interactions which is... fine considering what i've done so far.
What principle is that praytell?In post 445, House wrote:I was toying with the possibility that Manatee & Enchant might both be scum during my catch-up, but ultimately dismissed it as being unlikely on general principle.In post 440, Titus wrote:You seem to have a problem with the Enchant wagon.In post 341, ManateeGal wrote:i dont know what youre trying to get at hereIn post 338, Titus wrote:Why is it fine? What's the problem with pushing awkward, low content slots?In post 331, ManateeGal wrote:is there a basis for the enchant wagon im missing?
mine seems to be based off of lack of content or interactions which is... fine considering what i've done so far.
Pretty sure he was trolling my signature.In post 450, Titus wrote:In post 418, House wrote:LolIn post 416, Thor Ragnarok wrote:VOTE: Gamma
House, why did you move away from your main on Wake? I thought your playstyle there was quite smooth and buttery
House is not Wake.
See situation room. 3 scum were wagoned d1.In post 451, House wrote:2 scum blundering into competing wagons on d1?
Just because one wife gives her husband carte blanche on extramarital affairs doesn't mean wives sign off on such behavior on a regular basis.In post 455, Titus wrote:See situation room. 3 scum were wagoned d1.In post 451, House wrote:2 scum blundering into competing wagons on d1?
It's common enough (the scum wagoned, not the affairs). Plus Enchant never really took off. It's too early to tell yes or no. It's just good to push them both.In post 457, House wrote:Just because one wife gives her husband carte blanche on extramarital affairs doesn't mean wives sign off on such behavior on a regular basis.In post 455, Titus wrote:See situation room. 3 scum were wagoned d1.In post 451, House wrote:2 scum blundering into competing wagons on d1?
There were no affairs with my ex marriage.In post 459, Gamma Emerald wrote:maybe that's an overreaction but something tells me that's not gonna strike a good chord with titus
I don't think you've ever TR me so I went 'yay' IRL :3In post 456, Titus wrote:I like Ydrasse as town lol
wasn't sure, just felt like it was a touchy subjectIn post 464, Titus wrote:There were no affairs with my ex marriage.In post 459, Gamma Emerald wrote:maybe that's an overreaction but something tells me that's not gonna strike a good chord with titus
It's shit play to refer to ongoing games when addressing a read on somebody because anything that person says in response can lead to a ban.In post 460, Bee wrote:VOTE: House
1) I feel like your anger at Gamma is like.... really fast. It escalated up to "no kill one of us" in a way that doesn't feel organic to me.
2) I don't know how much you've played but you're an older user and I find it kinda unbelievable that you'd dismiss two scum wagons D1 because they happen not an uncommon amount imo.
3) I like Gamma and Manatee as town right now so woo.
If something's triggering, I'll say so but it would have to be conduct/references that are particularly close to what happened fyi.In post 467, Gamma Emerald wrote:wasn't sure, just felt like it was a touchy subjectIn post 464, Titus wrote:There were no affairs with my ex marriage.In post 459, Gamma Emerald wrote:maybe that's an overreaction but something tells me that's not gonna strike a good chord with titus
House, people make mistakes. You're overreacting here. I'd hate to miseliminate you here, but I will for the game state.In post 468, House wrote:It's shit play to refer to ongoing games when addressing a read on somebody because anything that person says in response can lead to a ban.In post 460, Bee wrote:VOTE: House
1) I feel like your anger at Gamma is like.... really fast. It escalated up to "no kill one of us" in a way that doesn't feel organic to me.
2) I don't know how much you've played but you're an older user and I find it kinda unbelievable that you'd dismiss two scum wagons D1 because they happen not an uncommon amount imo.
3) I like Gamma and Manatee as town right now so woo.
I don't give a damn if Gamma gets mod confirmed as all innocent child at L-1, I'd hammer him just for ban baiting me.
I mean yeah it sucks but also getting that mad about it that fast in conjunction with dismissing two other people and parking there is ??In post 468, House wrote:It's shit play to refer to ongoing games when addressing a read on somebody because anything that person says in response can lead to a ban.In post 460, Bee wrote:VOTE: House
1) I feel like your anger at Gamma is like.... really fast. It escalated up to "no kill one of us" in a way that doesn't feel organic to me.
2) I don't know how much you've played but you're an older user and I find it kinda unbelievable that you'd dismiss two scum wagons D1 because they happen not an uncommon amount imo.
3) I like Gamma and Manatee as town right now so woo.
I don't give a damn if Gamma gets mod confirmed as all innocent child at L-1, I'd hammer him just for ban baiting me.
It's not a mistake. It's behavior that happens all the time.In post 470, Titus wrote:House, people make mistakes. You're overreacting here. I'd hate to miseliminate you here, but I will for the game state.In post 468, House wrote:It's shit play to refer to ongoing games when addressing a read on somebody because anything that person says in response can lead to a ban.In post 460, Bee wrote:VOTE: House
1) I feel like your anger at Gamma is like.... really fast. It escalated up to "no kill one of us" in a way that doesn't feel organic to me.
2) I don't know how much you've played but you're an older user and I find it kinda unbelievable that you'd dismiss two scum wagons D1 because they happen not an uncommon amount imo.
3) I like Gamma and Manatee as town right now so woo.
I don't give a damn if Gamma gets mod confirmed as all innocent child at L-1, I'd hammer him just for ban baiting me.
definitely a thing that happensIn post 451, House wrote:2 scum blundering into competing wagons on d1?