I don’t know if this is at me but my vote on you isn’t because of Gamma’s read...In post 797, House wrote:Not to mention, if you're willing to trust Gamma's read of me over Titus, who knows me 20x better than Gamma... well, piss off.
House's nuclear response to GammaIn post 792, Bee wrote:Why?In post 790, Thor Ragnarok wrote:House and I are both town in my opinion
Your excuse for voting me is even lazier.In post 800, Bee wrote:I don’t know if this is at me but my vote on you isn’t because of Gamma’s read...In post 797, House wrote:Not to mention, if you're willing to trust Gamma's read of me over Titus, who knows me 20x better than Gamma... well, piss off.
It’s for stuff like this I guess? And you called votes on you lazy earlier too.
:/ You don’t have to make the game like this for other people though.In post 802, House wrote:Your excuse for voting me is even lazier.In post 800, Bee wrote:I don’t know if this is at me but my vote on you isn’t because of Gamma’s read...In post 797, House wrote:Not to mention, if you're willing to trust Gamma's read of me over Titus, who knows me 20x better than Gamma... well, piss off.
It’s for stuff like this I guess? And you called votes on you lazy earlier too.
It's not scum-indicative to get pissy about being voted for "ongoing games" and being unable to point out how it's a load of bullshit without getting banned.
That ruins the entire fucking game for me, and i have zero desire to effort when this kind of crap is allowed to happen.
Early game I like seeing fast pressure and wagon momentum, and House is a slot I'm fine with a wagon on currently.In post 798, Bee wrote:I don’t see scum!Gamma right now but why not wagon someone? Just because of the effort vs the other two?
You seem to be an alt of an older (in MS years) player, surely you must have seen many players rage in games as scum, no?In post 803, Thor Ragnarok wrote:Too suicidal with the way he acts to be scum
I’m not a fan either but idk. I feel kind of shitty about the vote there right now.In post 807, Harvey and Haley wrote:Early game I like seeing fast pressure and wagon momentum, and House is a slot I'm fine with a wagon on currently.In post 798, Bee wrote:I don’t see scum!Gamma right now but why not wagon someone? Just because of the effort vs the other two?
Not a fan of his disengagement with the game after the Gamma spat, especially considering he scumreads his most popular counterwagon.
I'm disinclined towards breaking that momentum just to build a wagon on a slot I don't feel very strongly about, and that other players have shown a lack of interest in voting alongside.
-Harvey
He's much better at burning bridges that weren't there rather than building them, he's not giving much reason to anyone to not vote him which shows the lack of a scum motiveIn post 804, Bee wrote:I think he might be mad about that regardless and also he’s been kind of mad a lot of the game or at least irritated :<. Do you think that if he’s been able to sustain it it’s less likely to be fake?
Wow, you do know me.In post 813, Thor Ragnarok wrote:He's much better at burning bridges that weren't there rather than building them, he's not giving much reason to anyone to not vote him which shows the lack of a scum motiveIn post 804, Bee wrote:I think he might be mad about that regardless and also he’s been kind of mad a lot of the game or at least irritated :<. Do you think that if he’s been able to sustain it it’s less likely to be fake?
In post 809, Harvey and Haley wrote:You seem to be an alt of an older (in MS years) player, surely you must have seen many players rage in games as scum, no?In post 803, Thor Ragnarok wrote:Too suicidal with the way he acts to be scum
-Harvey
There was usually a good reason to channel it thoughIn post 811, Harvey and Haley wrote:Also, Thor, would you be able to summarize the reasoning behind the wagon on you? And your thoughts on that?
-Harvey
IDK I go the opposite direction with this and think he’s burning bridges to say look how much I’m fighting and no one is on my side but I’ll let him be for now because I don’t want to get into it since he’s not going to move his vote. :/In post 813, Thor Ragnarok wrote:He's much better at burning bridges that weren't there rather than building them, he's not giving much reason to anyone to not vote him which shows the lack of a scum motiveIn post 804, Bee wrote:I think he might be mad about that regardless and also he’s been kind of mad a lot of the game or at least irritated :<. Do you think that if he’s been able to sustain it it’s less likely to be fake?
Manatee or Enchant would be better votes if you're determined to let a player hide his lies behind a claim that can't be addressed without rulebreaking.
I'd like to talk about Miss Midnight in more detail.In post 815, Thor Ragnarok wrote: I dislike Miss Midnight the most, the worst critiquing my number analysis as being possibly malicious also makes me dislike him somewhat, that seems quite unreasonable to think. Nothing notable on the others
Call the bluff IMO, see what happens as he gets closer to lim range - will he change his vote? Will other players suddenly attempt to push a counterwagon?In post 816, Bee wrote:IDK I go the opposite direction with this and think he’s burning bridges to say look how much I’m fighting and no one is on my side but I’ll let him be for now because I don’t want to get into it since he’s not going to move his vote. :/
Nope.In post 822, Harvey and Haley wrote:Call the bluff IMO, see what happens as he gets closer to lim range - will he change his vote? Will other players suddenly attempt to push a counterwagon?In post 816, Bee wrote:IDK I go the opposite direction with this and think he’s burning bridges to say look how much I’m fighting and no one is on my side but I’ll let him be for now because I don’t want to get into it since he’s not going to move his vote. :/
-Harvey
Look I’m sorry but I really don’t think Gamma pushes you by lying and having that be a defense instead of being able to say something? That doesn’t vibe with me at all. I really wish you would just... IDK. Sorry that this keeps coming up but I just can’t understand that being the angle. I’ll reread it when I’m home that entire interaction if you want but for right now I don’t see it like you do.In post 820, House wrote:Manatee or Enchant would be better votes if you're determined to let a player hide his lies behind a claim that can't be addressed without rulebreaking.
