Mini Normal 2234 | Who needs title (Game Over)

T3 · Post Post #650 (ISO) » Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:04 am

Being passive isn't necessarily a scumtell.

Save The Dragons · Post Post #651 (ISO) » Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:04 am

T3 hasn't done anything crazy yet...

T3 · Post Post #652 (ISO) » Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:06 am

In post 581, Salsabil Faria wrote:
In post 324, T3 wrote:
In post 262, DrippingGoofball wrote:
In post 138, T3 wrote:Titus is being so overtly strange that I'm tempted to just call it NAI?
TSTBS
Not exactly.

I never played with
meme

Titus
before, do you?

Titus isn't memeing, she's joking but seriously.

T3 · Post Post #653 (ISO) » Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:06 am

In post 651, Save The Dragons wrote:T3 hasn't done anything crazy yet...

Fortunately.

hardclaim cult leader :0

T3 · Post Post #654 (ISO) » Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:06 am

In post 589, Salsabil Faria wrote:
In post 364, T3 wrote:
In post 37, superbowl9 wrote:
In post 29, Gamma Emerald wrote:lul
PEdit: interesting, I feel like in past games you’ve used a “guilty until proven innocent” approach with me, am I wrong? If I’m right, why the flip in tactics?
You're right, I guess that's just how I look at everyone by default?
And cause I feel like it

In post 42, superbowl9 wrote:
In post 41, marcistar wrote:
In post 39, T3 wrote:marcistar anagrams to "Arm rats IC"
Naturally you are a rats arm who also rolled IC.
shh thats a secret for now yknow?
Hey I'm a hidden IC too!

In post 148, superbowl9 wrote:
In post 138, T3 wrote:Titus is being so overtly strange that I'm tempted to just call it NAI?
How? I've played with titus a bunch and she doesn't really seem abnormal to me thus far

In post 201, superbowl9 wrote:Agreed galron I smell something fishy about T3
VOTE: T3

In post 344, superbowl9 wrote:
In post 206, Galron wrote:
In post 201, superbowl9 wrote:Agreed galron I smell something fishy about T3
VOTE: T3
What is it that you see?
Just seems like their sorting has been artificial to me
In post 227, GrandpaMo wrote:
In post 223, HockeyFan wrote:
In post 215, GrandpaMo wrote: ur questioning me regarding why i said that was a bread crumb but you replied to gamma regarding rolefishing. if you know that gamma was tryna rolefish > then you my narrative is correct that you do believe it was a bread crumb. do you understand? or do you want me to simplify it easier for u? its basically like a logic gate.
lol? I mean you're just assuming that just because I question soemoen else on why THEY know/want to know the "breadcrumb" and why THEY care doesnt mean i think its a breadcrumb? Me not seeing the "breadcrumb" and me questioning someone on someone whos fishing for that breadcrumb can both be true
eh its usually means it. im not arguing with you anymore regarding this -- i swear this SHIT HAPPENED IM GETTING DEJA VU LOL

WE WERE LITERALLYT BOTH TVT TUNNELING EACH OTHER FOR PETTY SHIT LOL
why would you jump to TvT here? seems very odd
In post 258, GrandpaMo wrote:
In post 257, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 223, HockeyFan wrote:
In post 215, GrandpaMo wrote: ur questioning me regarding why i said that was a bread crumb but you replied to gamma regarding rolefishing. if you know that gamma was tryna rolefish > then you my narrative is correct that you do believe it was a bread crumb. do you understand? or do you want me to simplify it easier for u? its basically like a logic gate.
lol? I mean you're just assuming that just because I question soemoen else on why THEY know/want to know the "breadcrumb" and why THEY care doesnt mean i think its a breadcrumb? Me not seeing the "breadcrumb" and me questioning someone on someone whos fishing for that breadcrumb can both be true
I don’t think I’d need to ask if there was an actual breadcrumb
I moreso asked because I didn’t see it and scum are generally the ones who’d look out for them so I wanted to put GMo on the spot
if you didn't see it. and people have claimed they haven't either. and i said its a breadcrumb, then wouldn't that make me town? since what titus said not a breadcrumb from ur pov?
for someone who said they were moving on from this you sure haven't
In post 288, Salsabil Faria wrote:
In post 21, superbowl9 wrote:VOTE: superbowl9
saying this is scum indicative is scum indicative so watch yourselves

Are you
Not_Mafia
?
I'm a hectic alt
In post 299, Salsabil Faria wrote:
In post 83, superbowl9 wrote:
In post 80, Titus wrote:Townbinning Gamma.
SCUM TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE FOCUS ON ME DOING THIS TO EARLY TOWNBIN A BUDDY HMMMMMMMM?~?!!?

Is this post serious?
Don't try me.....
In post 327, T3 wrote:I did some metadiving of sb9 last night but forgot to post it.
Don't bother no amount of work will get your scumbutt off the hook
These are all town Superb Owl 9 posts.

Ok
T3
is scum.

UNVOTE: sb9

VOTE: T3

Why are the posts I made there scummy?

T3 · Post Post #655 (ISO) » Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:07 am

I also just came across this golden post from 2004.

In post 19, Save The Dragons wrote:OMG I just realized my name has the initials STD...well...I knew it had those initials...but I just remembered what else has those initials

Salsabil Faria · Post Post #656 (ISO) » Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:10 am

In post 636, marcistar wrote:
In post 570, Salsabil Faria wrote:
In post 201, superbowl9 wrote:Agreed galron I smell something fishy about T3
VOTE: T3

UNVOTE: Titus

VOTE: sb9
wtf is ur thought process here..?
567 you have
"Titus/T3/?"
as your team, you then see superbowl vote t3 and vote them instead..?

It seemed opportunistic that moment as I'm not seeing them as TvT.

In post 636, marcistar wrote:
In post 586, Salsabil Faria wrote:
In post 349, marcistar wrote:VOTE: roden

Huh? (2)
its a good vote, you should join me on it.

Ok..

UNVOTE: T3

VOTE: Roden

Salsabil Faria · Post Post #657 (ISO) » Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:11 am

In post 640, Titus wrote:I think SF is scum with HockeyFan or Roden but not both.

Thoughts DGB?

Why don't vote me then?

Titus · Post Post #658 (ISO) » Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:12 am

In post 657, Salsabil Faria wrote:
In post 640, Titus wrote:I think SF is scum with HockeyFan or Roden but not both.

Thoughts DGB?

Why don't vote me then?

I am. Been voting you.

Salsabil Faria · Post Post #659 (ISO) » Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:13 am

In post 644, Galron wrote:
In post 615, Salsabil Faria wrote:(their wagon formation seems off)
What's this about?

The way

Kop

's wagon was formed without resistance.

Salsabil Faria · Post Post #660 (ISO) » Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:14 am

In post 645, HockeyFan wrote:
In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce

In post 641, superbowl9 wrote:
In post 639, marcistar wrote:
In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce
do u scumread them at all
Nope
btw wtf is this sequence lol. I dont think theres anythign wrong with DGB giving blanket reads

Can you read

DGb

?

superbowl9 · Post Post #661 (ISO) » Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:18 am

In post 645, HockeyFan wrote:
In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce

In post 641, superbowl9 wrote:
In post 639, marcistar wrote:
In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce
do u scumread them at all
Nope
btw wtf is this sequence lol. I dont think theres anythign wrong with DGB giving blanket reads

I dont think so either but if that's your entire content you need to go

T3 · Post Post #662 (ISO) » Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:18 am

In post 659, Salsabil Faria wrote:
In post 644, Galron wrote:
In post 615, Salsabil Faria wrote:(their wagon formation seems off)
What's this about?

The way
Kop
's wagon was formed without resistance.

In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce

No.

T3 · Post Post #663 (ISO) » Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:19 am

In post 661, superbowl9 wrote:
In post 645, HockeyFan wrote:
In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce

In post 641, superbowl9 wrote:
In post 639, marcistar wrote:
In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce
do u scumread them at all
Nope
btw wtf is this sequence lol. I dont think theres anythign wrong with DGB giving blanket reads
I dont think so either but if that's your entire content you need to go

Dunno man, what if we have DGB as an IC by meta who we don't eliminate.

T3 · Post Post #664 (ISO) » Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:19 am

In post 660, Salsabil Faria wrote:
In post 645, HockeyFan wrote:
In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce

In post 641, superbowl9 wrote:
In post 639, marcistar wrote:
In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce
do u scumread them at all
Nope
btw wtf is this sequence lol. I dont think theres anythign wrong with DGB giving blanket reads

Can you read
DGb
?

I can. (she's town)

superbowl9 · Post Post #665 (ISO) » Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:22 am

In post 663, T3 wrote:
In post 661, superbowl9 wrote:
In post 645, HockeyFan wrote:
In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce

In post 641, superbowl9 wrote:
In post 639, marcistar wrote:
In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce
do u scumread them at all
Nope
btw wtf is this sequence lol. I dont think theres anythign wrong with DGB giving blanket reads
I dont think so either but if that's your entire content you need to go
Dunno man, what if we have DGB as an IC by meta who we don't eliminate.

That makes no sense because when you get to eylo and have clueless town that's not posting how do you expect to win?

Save The Dragons · Post Post #666 (ISO) » Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:29 am

dgb gives content i don't know why you want to policy it

superbowl9 · Post Post #667 (ISO) » Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:32 am

In post 666, Save The Dragons wrote:dgb gives content i don't know why you want to policy it

such as?

marcistar · Post Post #668 (ISO) » Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:32 am

Save The Dragons · Post Post #669 (ISO) » Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:35 am

it gives reads

i like reads

superbowl9 · Post Post #670 (ISO) » Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:38 am

naked reads are not content

HockeyFan · Post Post #671 (ISO) » Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:39 am

In post 664, T3 wrote:
In post 660, Salsabil Faria wrote:
In post 645, HockeyFan wrote:
In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce

In post 641, superbowl9 wrote:
In post 639, marcistar wrote:
In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce
do u scumread them at all
Nope
btw wtf is this sequence lol. I dont think theres anythign wrong with DGB giving blanket reads

Can you read
DGb
?
I can. (she's town)

t3 who do u sr, u've trd like 8 ppl

Save The Dragons · Post Post #672 (ISO) » Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:40 am

In post 670, superbowl9 wrote:naked reads are not content

i said i like reads

superbowl9 · Post Post #673 (ISO) » Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:45 am

In post 667, superbowl9 wrote:
In post 666, Save The Dragons wrote:dgb gives content i don't know why you want to policy it
such as?

Save The Dragons · Post Post #674 (ISO) » Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:46 am

In post 392, DrippingGoofball wrote:Superb Owl 9 should have an owl avatar.

bam

content