Mini Normal 2234 | Who needs title (Game Over)

[superbowl9]

STD if you were to spell "police" but replace all the es with ys how would you do that?

[Save The Dragons]

some posts i've liked recently (doesn't mean i agree but i've like the thought process)

Fuck, I have too many Tr's rn.

I found Titus' partner.

Explain?

The whining about having too many townreads is scummy-yummy.

t3 is town.

gamma town.

Hockey scum.

Voting lurksack for now.

VOTE: Kop

marci is town.

[Save The Dragons]

STD if you were to spell "police" but replace all the es with ys how would you do that?

are you a super bowl or a superb owl or maybe even a 'sup, erbowl?

[Roden]

Anyone against running up Grandpa? They feel subdued and cautious, and normally would've been scum read by now.

Me, especially because you went from saying scum is passive to suggesting the one player who's actually had a confrontation

I said majority scum is passive, and Grandpa's play so far has been relatively passive anyway.

So who's being active to you if not Grandpa???? Also the other half of this is bs because you tacitly agree to the premise that you should be hunting within lower activity slots in 468 so don't try to worm out from that now

I didn't say anything about hunting within lower activity slots lol. Don't put words in my mouth.

Passive =/= lower activity and you should know the difference.

So are you gonna actually address my post or just point out that lower activity =/= passive?

You keep dodging the actual thrust of what people are saying in favor of semantics. If you wanted me to replace every instance of "active" with "non-passive" in my post you're just being pedantic

I don't know why you want me specifically to point out who's being active though. I can copy/paste the activity overview if you really want but you're asking for info that contributes nothing and is easily accessible to you anyway. It absolutely isn't semantics either way because if we're talking about being passive I absolutely think you are, since at the time you posted this I really don't think you've done much to add to the game except joke around and be a contrarian.

[marcistar]

roden whos ur scumpartners

[Salsabil Faria]

STD if you were to spell "police" but replace all the es with ys how would you do that?

are you a super bowl or a superb owl or maybe even a 'sup, erbowl?

lolol! (2)

Btw, what's your read on me

STD

? You don't even mention me yet iirr...

[Save The Dragons]

you feel town

[superbowl9]

STD if you were to spell "police" but replace all the es with ys how would you do that?

are you a super bowl or a superb owl or maybe even a 'sup, erbowl?

originially i was a stellar vehicle for soup or cereal but now even i don't know anymore

[Roden]

roden whos ur scumpartners

I can tell you on Day 4.

[superbowl9]

Anyone against running up Grandpa? They feel subdued and cautious, and normally would've been scum read by now.

Me, especially because you went from saying scum is passive to suggesting the one player who's actually had a confrontation

I said majority scum is passive, and Grandpa's play so far has been relatively passive anyway.

So who's being active to you if not Grandpa???? Also the other half of this is bs because you tacitly agree to the premise that you should be hunting within lower activity slots in 468 so don't try to worm out from that now

I didn't say anything about hunting within lower activity slots lol. Don't put words in my mouth.

Passive =/= lower activity and you should know the difference.

So are you gonna actually address my post or just point out that lower activity =/= passive?

You keep dodging the actual thrust of what people are saying in favor of semantics. If you wanted me to replace every instance of "active" with "non-passive" in my post you're just being pedantic

I don't know why you want me specifically to point out who's being active though. I can copy/paste the activity overview if you really want but you're asking for info that contributes nothing and is easily accessible to you anyway. It absolutely isn't semantics either way because if we're talking about being passive I absolutely think you are, since at the time you posted this I really don't think you've done much to add to the game except joke around and be a contrarian.

I think there's a chance you might actually be confused and not dodging so I'll say this: by activity I don't mean solely post count, I mean active contributions. Idc if you think I'm passive, I want to know who you think is NOT being passive (since you seem to equate active solely with post count - maybe I need to find another antonym for passive???). Once you tell me I can actually make my point, not that it will land anymore now that we've run around in circles over semantics.

[Roden]

I don't seem aggressive because there's really not much to attack this game. There's no big personalities, no spicy takes, no town leaders, and nearly all the scum reads coming from everyone feel half-hearted.

[Roden]

Anyone against running up Grandpa? They feel subdued and cautious, and normally would've been scum read by now.

Me, especially because you went from saying scum is passive to suggesting the one player who's actually had a confrontation

I said majority scum is passive, and Grandpa's play so far has been relatively passive anyway.

So who's being active to you if not Grandpa???? Also the other half of this is bs because you tacitly agree to the premise that you should be hunting within lower activity slots in 468 so don't try to worm out from that now

I didn't say anything about hunting within lower activity slots lol. Don't put words in my mouth.

Passive =/= lower activity and you should know the difference.

So are you gonna actually address my post or just point out that lower activity =/= passive?

You keep dodging the actual thrust of what people are saying in favor of semantics. If you wanted me to replace every instance of "active" with "non-passive" in my post you're just being pedantic

I don't know why you want me specifically to point out who's being active though. I can copy/paste the activity overview if you really want but you're asking for info that contributes nothing and is easily accessible to you anyway. It absolutely isn't semantics either way because if we're talking about being passive I absolutely think you are, since at the time you posted this I really don't think you've done much to add to the game except joke around and be a contrarian.

I think there's a chance you might actually be confused and not dodging so I'll say this: by activity I don't mean solely post count, I mean active contributions. Idc if you think I'm passive, I want to know who you think is NOT being passive (since you seem to equate active solely with post count - maybe I need to find another antonym for passive???). Once you tell me I can actually make my point, not that it will land anymore now that we've run around in circles over semantics.

I think mostly everyone has contributed in one way of another. Kop is the most notable exception, but I actually would say Galron is an exception as well. He is supposedly town by meta and his post count is decent, but I honestly can't remember anything that he's said or contributed.

[marcistar]

I don't seem aggressive because there's really not much to attack this game. There's no big personalities, no spicy takes, no town leaders, and nearly all the scum reads coming from everyone feel half-hearted.

:shrug:
maybe u should try to do something and become the townleader then... or do u like this gamestate rn..?

[HockeyFan]

thing im good with a new established town core of Salsa, Marci, superbowl and Roden.

Salsa- I like the content of thier posts + they just seem natrual town progression to me
Marci- Really like tone/vibes of her posts, + nothign seems off about them
Superbowl- Hes taking the game super lighthearted which i think is town +?
Roden- Town progression on reads

[Galron]

(their wagon formation seems off)

What's this about?

The way

Kop

's wagon was formed without resistance.

What kind of resistance do you expect? T3's grew without resistance. Kop's grew without resistance. Why this one?

[Galron]

(their wagon formation seems off)

What's this about?

The way

Kop

's wagon was formed without resistance.

What kind of resistance do you expect? T3's grew without resistance. Kop's grew without resistance. Why this one?

I guess, what makes Kop's stand out?

[Galron]

So if this is common then I guess it's not +town. I don't remember you doing it though.

[Roden]

I don't seem aggressive because there's really not much to attack this game. There's no big personalities, no spicy takes, no town leaders, and nearly all the scum reads coming from everyone feel half-hearted.

:shrug:
maybe u should try to do something and become the townleader then... or do u like this gamestate rn..?

I don't think I'd be a good town leader due to my role.

Btw I guess I should probably say now that this game might be weighted towards scum, or at least set up in a way to give them a favorable end game. I say this due to the info my role provides + the current game state having little to no leads on scum.

[Galron]

Dude.

[Roden]

I don't seem aggressive because there's really not much to attack this game. There's no big personalities, no spicy takes, no town leaders, and nearly all the scum reads coming from everyone feel half-hearted.

:shrug:
maybe u should try to do something and become the townleader then... or do u like this gamestate rn..?

I don't think I'd be a good town leader due to my role.

Btw I guess I should probably say now that this game might be weighted towards scum, or at least set up in a way to give them a favorable end game. I say this due to the info my role provides + the current game state having little to no leads on scum.

To clarify, I think scum have strong roles and/or town has weak roles with little potential to be swingy.

[marcistar]

So if this is common then I guess it's not +town. I don't remember you doing it though.

its not that common in my playstyle for me to make short useless posts

I don't seem aggressive because there's really not much to attack this game. There's no big personalities, no spicy takes, no town leaders, and nearly all the scum reads coming from everyone feel half-hearted.

:shrug:
maybe u should try to do something and become the townleader then... or do u like this gamestate rn..?

I don't think I'd be a good town leader due to my role.

Btw I guess I should probably say now that this game might be weighted towards scum, or at least set up in a way to give them a favorable end game. I say this due to the info my role provides + the current game state having little to no leads on scum.

...
...
...
...
i couldve already guessed the game would be weighted towards scum, i dont think the "no day chat" was added for no reason.
kinda lowkey didnt think u needed to do this.. but whats done is done.

[superbowl9]

Spoiler: big quote

I think scum is majority passive this time around since no one's making waves and nobody wants to make any controversial takes.

so then y arent u trying to dissect the people who fit under this more then..?

Because I just came to this realization.

Anyone against running up Grandpa? They feel subdued and cautious, and normally would've been scum read by now.

Me, especially because you went from saying scum is passive to suggesting the one player who's actually had a confrontation

I said majority scum is passive, and Grandpa's play so far has been relatively passive anyway.

So who's being active to you if not Grandpa???? Also the other half of this is bs because you tacitly agree to the premise that you should be hunting within lower activity slots in 468 so don't try to worm out from that now

I didn't say anything about hunting within lower activity slots lol. Don't put words in my mouth.

Passive =/= lower activity and you should know the difference.

So are you gonna actually address my post or just point out that lower activity =/= passive?

You keep dodging the actual thrust of what people are saying in favor of semantics. If you wanted me to replace every instance of "active" with "non-passive" in my post you're just being pedantic

I don't know why you want me specifically to point out who's being active though. I can copy/paste the activity overview if you really want but you're asking for info that contributes nothing and is easily accessible to you anyway. It absolutely isn't semantics either way because if we're talking about being passive I absolutely think you are, since at the time you posted this I really don't think you've done much to add to the game except joke around and be a contrarian.

I think there's a chance you might actually be confused and not dodging so I'll say this: by activity I don't mean solely post count, I mean active contributions. Idc if you think I'm passive, I want to know who you think is NOT being passive (since you seem to equate active solely with post count - maybe I need to find another antonym for passive???). Once you tell me I can actually make my point, not that it will land anymore now that we've run around in circles over semantics.

I think mostly everyone has contributed in one way of another. Kop is the most notable exception, but I actually would say Galron is an exception as well. He is supposedly town by meta and his post count is decent, but I honestly can't remember anything that he's said or contributed.

^just putting the whole context of this exchange here - is this not pinging anyone else? It seems like you're just throwing nice-sounding things out there because you've done nothing to push/hunt the "passive" slots you were in line to scout out - if you're actually town you don't seem to be such an active role model yourself.
pedit: apparently softing D1 for no reason is cool now???

[marcistar]

pedit: apparently softing D1 for no reason is cool now???

i was trying to think about this but im so confused.. the biggest flag is "i cant be a townleader because of my role" seems like bs to me LOL... just seems a bit of an excuse so he could continue to slide by being inactive.
it isn't cool at all, but im not sure how to proceed...

[superbowl9]

pedit: apparently softing D1 for no reason is cool now???

i was trying to think about this but im so confused.. the biggest flag is "i cant be a townleader because of my role" seems like bs to me LOL... just seems a bit of an excuse so he could continue to slide by being inactive.
it isn't cool at all, but im not sure how to proceed...

I think it buys a day, if he's alive tomorrow he hardclaims and we go from there

[marcistar]

thats true
UNVOTE: