Mini Normal 2234 | Who needs title (Game Over)

[Titus]

Normally, I wouldn't like Roden's post but I kinda do atm. Why is a mystery?

I don't think HockeyFan plays the game this why if scum with SF.

That leaves me with a conundrum as one of them should be scum with SF as the posting doesn't make sense.

What if... all 3 of us are town? I dont see why u think SF must be paired with one of us. Like what in her posting implies that? Sf's recent readslist had me as town and Roden as scum. Do you think scum!Sf puts either of thier partners in T/S. wouldnt they want to put them in null?

HockeyFan, you're new here obviously, not an alt. I generally have a rule of three. If scum lists three or more people in a list, it usually has scum in it. Roden being scum in her list is NAI.

SF selectively paying attention to only one of you and Roden doing the same thing doesn't sit well with me. Perhaps I am reading partners wrong as the goal may have been agency capture or whiteknight given how people reacted to your post.

[T3]

Gonna read some ISO's.

[T3]

RVS over?

Awkward post.

[Gamma Emerald]

pedit: apparently softing D1 for no reason is cool now???

i was trying to think about this but im so confused.. the biggest flag is "i cant be a townleader because of my role" seems like bs to me LOL... just seems a bit of an excuse so he could continue to slide by being inactive.
it isn't cool at all, but im not sure how to proceed...

Nah.

Scum don't do that.

Absolutely false and do not try to convince people that this is the case

Pretty much all the time when I've seen someone openly claim PR on day 1 without any reason they have been town.

I’ve seen T3 do this, which is why I called the comment valid, it makes sense for him

[Titus]

@HockeyFan, I just looked over the post and Roden isn't in a rule of 3 either though (debatable).

[T3]

pedit: apparently softing D1 for no reason is cool now???

i was trying to think about this but im so confused.. the biggest flag is "i cant be a townleader because of my role" seems like bs to me LOL... just seems a bit of an excuse so he could continue to slide by being inactive.
it isn't cool at all, but im not sure how to proceed...

Nah.

Scum don't do that.

Absolutely false and do not try to convince people that this is the case

Pretty much all the time when I've seen someone openly claim PR on day 1 without any reason they have been town.

I’ve seen T3 do this, which is why I called the comment valid, it makes sense for him

When?
(if I have I forgot lol)

[T3]

k back to reading Salsa's ISO

[T3]

it's a jokey RVS vote

Since when you do jokey RVS?

Have you even played with STD?

[Gamma Emerald]

Mini 2226
You weren’t actually PR but the idea was there

[T3]

Galron lock town

VOTE: HF

The FoS is post 6.

Oh. Well its weird to vote someone(even if its RVS) under the reason "I've sussed you in previous games, so let me sus you early this game and throw shade". Even if its RVS, Std saying rn makes it easy for him to push Gamma later in the game based on "you're always sus".

UNVOTE: HF

Why is this scummy?
Why does this outweigh the earlier post?

[T3]

Mini 2226
You weren’t actually PR but the idea was there

True.

[T3]

VOTE: salsa
Salsa is doing... basically nothing. She has maybe 15 serious posts in her 85 post ISO.

[T3]

And most of those serious posts are asking for reads and/or elaboration on reads, or stating she agrees with other people. Very few actual reads.

[HockeyFan]

Normally, I wouldn't like Roden's post but I kinda do atm. Why is a mystery?

I don't think HockeyFan plays the game this why if scum with SF.

That leaves me with a conundrum as one of them should be scum with SF as the posting doesn't make sense.

What if... all 3 of us are town? I dont see why u think SF must be paired with one of us. Like what in her posting implies that? Sf's recent readslist had me as town and Roden as scum. Do you think scum!Sf puts either of thier partners in T/S. wouldnt they want to put them in null?

HockeyFan, you're new here obviously, not an alt. I generally have a rule of three. If scum lists three or more people in a list, it usually has scum in it. Roden being scum in her list is NAI.

SF selectively paying attention to only one of you and Roden doing the same thing doesn't sit well with me.

Perhaps I am reading partners wrong as the goal may have been agency capture or whiteknight given how people reacted to your post.

Ok so u think Roden is more paired with SF based on the "rule of 3" which btw doesnt apply here because iirc sf only mentioned 2 scum? What does the bolded mean? Idt SF is only paying attention to us 2?

[Titus]

Now, read list in no particular order....

Grandpa

HF

marci

sb9

Kop

GE

Galron

Titus

STD

Roden

DGb

T3

This would suggest partners in Kop/marci/sb9. I have zero problem putting Kop as a partner.
However, GE/Galron/STD contains people I mostly townread. :/

[Titus]

Normally, I wouldn't like Roden's post but I kinda do atm. Why is a mystery?

I don't think HockeyFan plays the game this why if scum with SF.

That leaves me with a conundrum as one of them should be scum with SF as the posting doesn't make sense.

What if... all 3 of us are town? I dont see why u think SF must be paired with one of us. Like what in her posting implies that? Sf's recent readslist had me as town and Roden as scum. Do you think scum!Sf puts either of thier partners in T/S. wouldnt they want to put them in null?

HockeyFan, you're new here obviously, not an alt. I generally have a rule of three. If scum lists three or more people in a list, it usually has scum in it. Roden being scum in her list is NAI.

SF selectively paying attention to only one of you and Roden doing the same thing doesn't sit well with me.

Perhaps I am reading partners wrong as the goal may have been agency capture or whiteknight given how people reacted to your post.

Ok so u think Roden is more paired with SF based on the "rule of 3" which btw doesnt apply here because iirc sf only mentioned 2 scum? What does the bolded mean? Idt SF is only paying attention to us 2?

My next post after that admitted the first question. I don't know what the bolded means. I guess buddying/agency capture but it would have worked so much better if you were partners.

[T3]

The FoS is post 6.

Oh. Well its weird to vote someone(even if its RVS) under the reason "I've sussed you in previous games, so let me sus you early this game and throw shade". Even if its RVS, Std saying rn makes it easy for him to push Gamma later in the game based on "you're always sus".

Then why play that card early or mention it at all? Scum would just hide it and be opportunistic most likely. Here, they're attempting to sort a hard slot early.

From post 1? When the person they want to sort didn’t post yet?

VOTE: Titus

StD lock town?

Not sure atm, they play passively, though for me to understand them.

VOTE: roden

Does my posting this game feel similar to Large 235 and/or Newbie 2073? That's how you got me last time, so I'm curious.

You were more active and brutal (more like strongly giving opinions without any hesitation) in the last mini I played with you. Here you seems different...

@SF, Why is T3 scum?

I played with scum!

T3

twice where they were extra active/solving, not being LHF... I'm getting the same vibe here.

@SF, Why do you dislike Roden's post but seem to have no comment on HockeyFan doing the same? Posts 260 and 460 for reference. What's the difference?

I don't see

HF

's post on 260 and 460 was a joke?

Typo 236. Neither is a joke.

236 was on page 10, so I'm giving them benefit of doubt as I never played with them before. But for

Roden

, it’s odd, I saw their game solving power.
460 seems joke to me.

How is 460 a joke? Why would a joke be scummy while a serious post is ok/forgettable?

Wait, I messed up 460 with 461, the later post was joke to me, 460 wasn’t a joke. I payed with

Roden

in another mini where they caught the deepwolf in Day 1 and night killed at Night 2 because of that. I'm not sensing that fierce

Roden

here, feels they're acting like cautious scum, thus I think that particular post is scummy.
And what I said about 236 stays.

Literally all of Salsa's actual content across 85 posts.

[T3]

Also, Salsa voted me for making a specific post that she found scummy without explanation, then when asked why she voted me claiming that it was due to meta?

[HockeyFan]

Now, read list in no particular order....

Grandpa

HF

marci

sb9

Kop

GE

Galron

Titus

STD

Roden

DGb

T3

This would suggest partners in Kop/marci/sb9. I have zero problem putting Kop as a partner.
However, GE/Galron/STD contains people I mostly townread. :/

assuming this aslo means that u think theres a scum between roden/dbg/t3 if salsa is red?

[T3]

While GIF has been very low content, I don't see any scum motivation in his posts so he gets a townread.

[HockeyFan]

wait, nvm dont answer that

[HockeyFan]

ok reading t3's recent content makes me comfy putting him back into my towncore

[superbowl9]

pedit: apparently softing D1 for no reason is cool now???

i was trying to think about this but im so confused.. the biggest flag is "i cant be a townleader because of my role" seems like bs to me LOL... just seems a bit of an excuse so he could continue to slide by being inactive.
it isn't cool at all, but im not sure how to proceed...

Nah.

Scum don't do that.

Absolutely false and do not try to convince people that this is the case

Pretty much all the time when I've seen someone openly claim PR on day 1 without any reason they have been town.

"I've never seen scum gambit" isn't really enough for me

[superbowl9]

Normally, I wouldn't like Roden's post but I kinda do atm. Why is a mystery?

I don't think HockeyFan plays the game this why if scum with SF.

That leaves me with a conundrum as one of them should be scum with SF as the posting doesn't make sense.

What if... all 3 of us are town? I dont see why u think SF must be paired with one of us. Like what in her posting implies that? Sf's recent readslist had me as town and Roden as scum. Do you think scum!Sf puts either of thier partners in T/S. wouldnt they want to put them in null?

HockeyFan, you're new here obviously, not an alt. I generally have a rule of three. If scum lists three or more people in a list, it usually has scum in it. Roden being scum in her list is NAI.

SF selectively paying attention to only one of you and Roden doing the same thing doesn't sit well with me. Perhaps I am reading partners wrong as the goal may have been agency capture or whiteknight given how people reacted to your post.

Why so partner-focused this early?

[Titus]

Now, read list in no particular order....

Grandpa

HF

marci

sb9

Kop

GE

Galron

Titus

STD

Roden

DGb

T3

This would suggest partners in Kop/marci/sb9. I have zero problem putting Kop as a partner.
However, GE/Galron/STD contains people I mostly townread. :/

assuming this aslo means that u think theres a scum between roden/dbg/t3 if salsa is red?

That would a) be a four scum scenario which has maybe existed once or twice in single ball since I've been playing and multiball has been outlawed in normals so no and b) Roden is technically in a group of 2, not three. The color codes are slightly different but hard to tell by the naked eye.