Yeah this is why I think if manatee is scum or certain 3P roles the random townie death has to be bunkIn post 1684, GuyInFreezer wrote:btw I highly doubt that manatee is groupscum because if she was she would’ve not claimed about the second vote that she didn’t have to show.
0_0In post 1702, unwnd wrote:Toog needs to be ejected because his role is a bit contradictory to what mine does, so either there's crazy overlap or I'm missing something.
I don't know why you'd suggest (assuming you still believe Toog is scum), that I'd be bussing him LLD.
I’d call lolcatting but Toog is probably just generally checked out of the game
This does not track rnIn post 1723, WhemeStar wrote:Cabd scum!
my playthrough of FE:A has kinda stagnated after having gotten through the first arcIn post 1750, Cabd wrote:(I'm here, but staying out of it as this is helpful data without me muddying. LLD, any other thoughts at this moment? Manatee, I think it's getting close to Fire Emblem Awakening Fredrick-ing time)
I don’t want to see kicking and screaming. I want to see genuine attempt to play mafia like a team gameIn post 1771, DrippingGoofball wrote:I am all for the guilt and shame.In post 1767, GuyInFreezer wrote:If you kick and scream until the bitter end you get to make some folks feel guilty and bad.
If you roll over and croak nobody will feel bad.
Why was gif in your null pile?In post 1780, WhemeStar wrote:What does imbiling meanIn post 1779, DrippingGoofball wrote:Who is your nullest null read, and what are you imbibing?In post 1778, WhemeStar wrote:I have started drinking so I may be drunk posting soon..,
And I have way too many
Unwnd giffy stand out too me
Except you have to have some personal agency when you think there’s a chance town’s being driven off a cliff. With LLD as null and Cabd as scum, why is that not a concern to you? It seems more like you’re content to let others take the blame for miseliminations here.In post 1783, WhemeStar wrote:If it ain’t broken don’t fix it
Double elim portion of whose role?In post 3272, Gamma Emerald wrote:hnnnnnggghhhh
Manatee Is like a breakdown of how the double elim portion of you role works
I feel like I post as if I’m in a constant state of inebriation with how some of my grammar isIn post 1799, Dunnstral wrote:In post 2270, unwnd wrote:My first underage (don't tell) drink I went onto forums and pretended to be drunk in the exact same way after having like 3 sips of beer
Then you grow up and realize talkfvndn liekt THIS is not actually what drunk people do
ManateeIn post 3283, Lukewarm wrote:Double elim portion of whose role?In post 3272, Gamma Emerald wrote:hnnnnnggghhhh
Manatee Is like a breakdown of how the double elim portion of you role works
How much effort did you put into other town games with ffery/LLD/cabdIn post 1853, WhemeStar wrote:Idk how town ffery scumreads me here but I am probably giving people 2 much credit in how well they can read me
Is = I’dIn post 3286, Lukewarm wrote:Manatee is like a breakdown of how the double elim portion of [[manatee's]] role works??
Please explain this sentence to me
I find it deeply ironic Titus replaced in for Toog of all peopleIn post 1854, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Glad to see this sentiment elsewhere. This was one of my first thoughts, that the claim did not match the previous softsIn post 1614, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:That doesn't confirm his role. It confirms his role has a neighbourizer stored somewhere within it.In post 1612, Lukewarm wrote:He said the first thing he unlocks is the neighborizor, and that would be confirmable.
So not confirmable now, but would be at some point in the future?
Again, this is not what Confirmable means. And certainly not what he intoned when he said it was confirmable.
The claim doesn't match what he's saying.
Manatee, I'd like a breakdown of how the double elim portion of your role worksIn post 3272, Gamma Emerald wrote:hnnnnnggghhhh
Manatee Is like a breakdown of how the double elim portion of you role works
I pretty much have game where I lead and games where I follow, and it probably is dictated by what the playerlist isIn post 1871, Kate Bishop wrote:I'm not 100% against it by any means.In post 1866, WhemeStar wrote:Ffery if someone is the “worst” player in the lobby what are your thoughts on that person sheeping others?
I've followed players I respect before. I do my best to get a solid read of the player first.
And I'm more likely to follow someone after they were right when I was wrong a few spectacular times.
And I try to learn what they were seeing that I wasn't.
And I occasionally get burned.
If you're following a Cabd or an LLD I hope it's with the intention to learn and get to a place where you're comfortable playing based on your own game thoughts.
How would it interact with roles that would screw with the elim?In post 3290, ManateeGal wrote:oh. its basically a dayvig activated by my second vote
In post 3291, Lukewarm wrote:Manatee, I'd like a breakdown of how the double elim portion of your role worksIn post 3272, Gamma Emerald wrote:hnnnnnggghhhh
Manatee Is like a breakdown of how the double elim portion of you role works
Got it. Given the Kate quote, my first reading was
Manatee is like a breakdown of house the double elim portion of [[Kate's]] role works
Which, made my mind race. Because, like Kate claimed a gated role, but not how they were gated, and so that read like you knew more about how Kate's role was gated then existed in the thread.
was there some Cabd/RC beef I never heard of?In post 1875, WhemeStar wrote:P.S sorry for bribing up RC cabd and making the comparison
Yes, Cabd too.In post 3266, Gamma Emerald wrote:Could you pls answer thisIn post 3252, Gamma Emerald wrote:Are kyouko/GIF/Kate all in this group for you?In post 3246, DrippingGoofball wrote:On the other hand you have players that aren't wagonable despite not being particularly townie, and for whom all is forgiven.
There was no attempt from MG to engage with me at the time that post was written.In post 3271, Gamma Emerald wrote:This is why you end up miseliminated. Not because you do things that are scummy but because you shut out attempts to engage with you genuinely. I see I was 100% in my right mind with my approach in LN 235, but I can’t play that way here when you give me nothing towny to go on initially.In post 1654, DrippingGoofball wrote:My death is a foregone conclusion so A RESOUNDING NO and here's your excuse to strut your stuff on the catwalk of shame as you all kill each other with your negative utility BS roles.In post 1646, ManateeGal wrote:are you gonna attempt to engage positively dgb?
:shrug: i dont think it would make a differenceIn post 3293, Gamma Emerald wrote:How would it interact with roles that would screw with the elim?In post 3290, ManateeGal wrote:oh. its basically a dayvig activated by my second vote
Yes, but I'd prefer it not be a topic of conversation this game. Sorry not sorry.In post 3295, Gamma Emerald wrote:was there some Cabd/RC beef I never heard of?In post 1875, WhemeStar wrote:P.S sorry for bribing up RC cabd and making the comparison
