In post 65, Mirio wrote:Why would scum say no to a raid where the only benefit is explicitly a recharge on x-shot roles that likely have not had the chance to act yet?
im only referring to you as Town!Mirio from now on....or TM. I agree with this but scum also want to get to +2 danger meter thing for the multitasking as fast as possible. +1 isnt super detrimental to town.
"I used to think you had this elegant-trolly, minimalist playstyle. Then I realized the playstyle is ~Lazy~
The true enlightenment was realizing that they are the same thing."
~fferyllt
"who the fuck fakeclaims Tracker like that
WHO THE FUCK DOES THAT"
~Alisae
In post 71, Romance wrote:Say no to make people seem scummy, deny additional town power in those shots, etc. But if it succeeds it’s only speculation that scum was on it.
Mafiascum RPG has echoes of this game, I think it was ran a few months ago.
are we not speculating on who scum could be day 1 anyways?
In post 71, Romance wrote:Say no to make people seem scummy, deny additional town power in those shots, etc. But if it succeeds it’s only speculation that scum was on it.
Mafiascum RPG has echoes of this game, I think it was ran a few months ago.
are we not speculating on who scum could be day 1 anyways?
For the record i originally thought you'd get a 1-shot ability to recharge a role with limited shots... didnt even see the "applicable roles" at the time because im a dummy.
and I'm making the point that scum has no reason not to be on the raid and more reason to want to be in the raid BEFORE it fills. speculating whether scum was or wasnt on doesnt matter when the assumption they were is more likely than not.
And I’m saying that I don’t put a lot of stock into that speculation when this entire conversation is an alarm to scum that if they’re not on maybe they can make everyone turn on each other under dumb assumptions.
we're talking prior to mastina claiming. Scum doesnt have the incentive any more if Mastina can auto succeed the raid but the raid hit 6 players before that happened.
Scum would probably be more likely to sabotage something if they lose more than they gain by letting it go through
I feel like trying to scumhunt by just assuming scum are gonna be in raids is kinda bad
In post 96, Qrow and Raven wrote:Scum would probably be more likely to sabotage something if they lose more than they gain by letting it go through
I feel like trying to scumhunt by just assuming scum are gonna be in raids is kinda bad
-Qrow
yes this is the only metric by which i judge scum.
