Why is Ranny Town? Or Titus? And how is A50’s content conclusive either way? You TR Titus but think I need to be in the POE? How have you decided on Norwegian’s alignment?In post 335, DkKoba wrote:this rebuttal is about as potent as a wet badgerIn post 330, Andresvmb wrote:Koba I think your POE is ass and you could be Scum. Fight me?
minus your own name, explain why it sucks.
This post isn't bad.In post 350, Andresvmb wrote:Why is Ranny Town? Or Titus? And how is A50’s content conclusive either way? You TR Titus but think I need to be in the POE? How have you decided on Norwegian’s alignment?In post 335, DkKoba wrote:this rebuttal is about as potent as a wet badgerIn post 330, Andresvmb wrote:Koba I think your POE is ass and you could be Scum. Fight me?
minus your own name, explain why it sucks.
Your POE is bad right now. At the very least it seems to have been set way too early.
I can make townreads very quick on people who I have meta on. (example: https://www.mafiauniverse.com/forums/th ... ame-Thread - I find 7 townies within the first 24 hours)In post 350, Andresvmb wrote:Why is Ranny Town? Or Titus? And how is A50’s content conclusive either way? You TR Titus but think I need to be in the POE? How have you decided on Norwegian’s alignment?In post 335, DkKoba wrote:this rebuttal is about as potent as a wet badgerIn post 330, Andresvmb wrote:Koba I think your POE is ass and you could be Scum. Fight me?
minus your own name, explain why it sucks.
Your POE is bad right now. At the very least it seems to have been set way too early.
its not good at all because its trying to discredit townreads rather than try to find them as town.In post 351, LicketyQuickety wrote:This post isn't bad.In post 350, Andresvmb wrote:Why is Ranny Town? Or Titus? And how is A50’s content conclusive either way? You TR Titus but think I need to be in the POE? How have you decided on Norwegian’s alignment?In post 335, DkKoba wrote:this rebuttal is about as potent as a wet badgerIn post 330, Andresvmb wrote:Koba I think your POE is ass and you could be Scum. Fight me?
minus your own name, explain why it sucks.
Your POE is bad right now. At the very least it seems to have been set way too early.
It's a post about you. And I think they've demonstrated lack of TMI twice already.In post 353, DkKoba wrote:its not good at all because its trying to discredit townreads rather than try to find them as town.In post 351, LicketyQuickety wrote:This post isn't bad.In post 350, Andresvmb wrote:Why is Ranny Town? Or Titus? And how is A50’s content conclusive either way? You TR Titus but think I need to be in the POE? How have you decided on Norwegian’s alignment?In post 335, DkKoba wrote:this rebuttal is about as potent as a wet badgerIn post 330, Andresvmb wrote:Koba I think your POE is ass and you could be Scum. Fight me?
minus your own name, explain why it sucks.
Your POE is bad right now. At the very least it seems to have been set way too early.
I mean norway and angel were RVS votes. t3 is just bad and cheeky was like an omgus vote/saying that I was scummy for joking around at times.
i don't scumread you I just dont townread you. I want to see more from you so you can reach the bar I'm setting right now.In post 357, Nero Cain wrote:koba always scumreads me so it's null.
It would help if you actually quoted where people SR for the reason you say they are. If it's just one person it doesn't mean much. You seemed to imply you were generally being SR for joking around and you haven't provided any evidence of that yet.In post 356, Nero Cain wrote:I mean norway and angel were RVS votes. t3 is just bad and cheeky was like an omgus vote/saying that I was scummy for joking around at times.
me joking around isn't a scumtell like you were trying to claim
Well I am not pushing on them right now - but I am happy to allow the push on them persist at this point. There is a bit of a jarring personality difference I've noticed since gamestart and the initial comment caught me off guard that was directed at me. I believe Andres will become more clear in general once the non-posters join us.In post 354, LicketyQuickety wrote:It's a post about you. And I think they've demonstrated lack of TMI twice already.In post 353, DkKoba wrote:its not good at all because its trying to discredit townreads rather than try to find them as town.In post 351, LicketyQuickety wrote:This post isn't bad.In post 350, Andresvmb wrote:Why is Ranny Town? Or Titus? And how is A50’s content conclusive either way? You TR Titus but think I need to be in the POE? How have you decided on Norwegian’s alignment?In post 335, DkKoba wrote:this rebuttal is about as potent as a wet badgerIn post 330, Andresvmb wrote:Koba I think your POE is ass and you could be Scum. Fight me?
minus your own name, explain why it sucks.
Your POE is bad right now. At the very least it seems to have been set way too early.
I agree Anders will be easier to read with time. We might be looking for different things from them, however. My read is probably more subjective in what I am looking for so I will have to keep watching them. RN I am lightly TRing them though which is less than a Town Lean.In post 361, DkKoba wrote:Well I am not pushing on them right now - but I am happy to allow the push on them persist at this point. There is a bit of a jarring personality difference I've noticed since gamestart and the initial comment caught me off guard that was directed at me. I believe Andres will become more clear in general once the non-posters join us.
Have we played together before?In post 362, LicketyQuickety wrote:I agree Anders will be easier to read with time. We might be looking for different things from them, however. My read is probably more subjective in what I am looking for so I will have to keep watching them. RN I am lightly TRing them though which is less than a Town Lean.In post 361, DkKoba wrote:Well I am not pushing on them right now - but I am happy to allow the push on them persist at this point. There is a bit of a jarring personality difference I've noticed since gamestart and the initial comment caught me off guard that was directed at me. I believe Andres will become more clear in general once the non-posters join us.
Not that I am aware of.In post 364, Andresvmb wrote:Have we played together before?In post 362, LicketyQuickety wrote:I agree Anders will be easier to read with time. We might be looking for different things from them, however. My read is probably more subjective in what I am looking for so I will have to keep watching them. RN I am lightly TRing them though which is less than a Town Lean.In post 361, DkKoba wrote:Well I am not pushing on them right now - but I am happy to allow the push on them persist at this point. There is a bit of a jarring personality difference I've noticed since gamestart and the initial comment caught me off guard that was directed at me. I believe Andres will become more clear in general once the non-posters join us.
So I guess you’re saying that I’ll be easier to read in the future because I’m posting a lot now? I wanted to make sure I wasn’t interpreting your post to mean something different. Typically when someone says something like what you wrote, I understand it to mean that because they know my playstyle, they’ll figure me out as we go along.In post 365, LicketyQuickety wrote:Not that I am aware of.
I have ways of categorizing players.In post 367, Andresvmb wrote:So I guess you’re saying that I’ll be easier to read in the future because I’m posting a lot now? I wanted to make sure I wasn’t interpreting your post to mean something different. Typically when someone says something like what you wrote, I understand it to mean that because they know my playstyle, they’ll figure me out as we go along.In post 365, LicketyQuickety wrote:Not that I am aware of.
part of the point was that half of the town votes on me weren't even serious. t3 was voting me for some posting frequency thing and cheeky was voting me b/c I had called her fake. It's very possible that Cheeky was paranoid of me being jokey came after this vote but she did make that point. You tried to throw shade on me and I countered with "but I was town here and made jokes after RVS" the burden is on you to prove what you are claiming.In post 360, LicketyQuickety wrote:It would help if you actually quoted where people SR for the reason you say they are. If it's just one person it doesn't mean much. You seemed to imply you were generally being SR for joking around and you haven't provided any evidence of that yet.In post 356, Nero Cain wrote:I mean norway and angel were RVS votes. t3 is just bad and cheeky was like an omgus vote/saying that I was scummy for joking around at times.
me joking around isn't a scumtell like you were trying to claim
I didn't throw shade. I was asking someone why they thought you were still in RVS. I gave my reasons to clarify why I was asking that. I was trying to get a read on Anders, which, it turns out they lacked TMI at least on your meta if not your alignment. You can disagree with me about my meta on you that you don't joke much, but don't kid yourself thinking I am Scummy for thinking so.In post 369, Nero Cain wrote:part of the point was that half of the town votes on me weren't even serious. t3 was voting me for some posting frequency thing and cheeky was voting me b/c I had called her fake. It's very possible that Cheeky was paranoid of me being jokey came after this vote but she did make that point. You tried to throw shade on me and I countered with "but I was town here and made jokes after RVS" the burden is on you to prove what you are claiming.In post 360, LicketyQuickety wrote:It would help if you actually quoted where people SR for the reason you say they are. If it's just one person it doesn't mean much. You seemed to imply you were generally being SR for joking around and you haven't provided any evidence of that yet.In post 356, Nero Cain wrote:I mean norway and angel were RVS votes. t3 is just bad and cheeky was like an omgus vote/saying that I was scummy for joking around at times.
me joking around isn't a scumtell like you were trying to claim
Were not still in RVS.In post 370, LicketyQuickety wrote:I didn't throw shade. I was asking someone why they thought you were not still in RVS. I gave my reasons to clarify why I was asking that. I was trying to get a read on Anders, which, it turns out they lacked TMI at least on your meta if not your alignment. You can disagree with me about my meta on you that you don't joke much, but don't kid yourself thinking I am Scummy for thinking so.In post 369, Nero Cain wrote:part of the point was that half of the town votes on me weren't even serious. t3 was voting me for some posting frequency thing and cheeky was voting me b/c I had called her fake. It's very possible that Cheeky was paranoid of me being jokey came after this vote but she did make that point. You tried to throw shade on me and I countered with "but I was town here and made jokes after RVS" the burden is on you to prove what you are claiming.In post 360, LicketyQuickety wrote:It would help if you actually quoted where people SR for the reason you say they are. If it's just one person it doesn't mean much. You seemed to imply you were generally being SR for joking around and you haven't provided any evidence of that yet.In post 356, Nero Cain wrote:I mean norway and angel were RVS votes. t3 is just bad and cheeky was like an omgus vote/saying that I was scummy for joking around at times.
me joking around isn't a scumtell like you were trying to claim
Sure. Here:In post 372, DkKoba wrote:Quick can you just link your last scumgame so i can just glance through it? Doesnt matter if its on MU or here.