oh, I seeIn post 499, MargotRosa wrote:It's anti-Town. Which is different to Scum. One is hampering Towns ability to find scum. The other is being scumIn post 498, Spangled wrote:how’d you go from calling her ‘performance art’ scummy to this?In post 463, MargotRosa wrote:Which is why I think, still, that she's likely Town.
and this quote is funnyIn post 364, Val89 wrote:given it looks like out illustrious mod is on high alert to lock the thread the second the hammer comes down.
Can I point out quickly thatIn post 480, MargotRosa wrote:You don't have to believe my reasons for believing that Cook was Town (which I'm still not convinced aren't true).
In post 501, Spangled wrote:pagetop!
and this quote is funnyIn post 364, Val89 wrote:given it looks like out illustrious mod is on high alert to lock the thread the second the hammer comes down.
Read the last few pages worth of my posts. It would be strange if I was saying anything else.In post 502, Facebones wrote:Can I point out quickly thatIn post 480, MargotRosa wrote:You don't have to believe my reasons for believing that Cook was Town (which I'm still not convinced aren't true).wastown is kinda strange wording pre-flip.
I agree, this is weird as hell. I can't think about it too much, or else my brain will snap and the game will never end
VOTE: Val would like to know as well. In any case, this makes me townlean Spangled. Val's primary scumreads were Cook and Spangled. If Val is scum, Spangled is unlikely to be as well. If Val was town and pushing scum!spangled then scum would take out Val instead, so perhaps Val you were pushing a town!spangled D1?In post 515, DArby wrote:On one hand we still have both scum but on the other we have both power roles.
VOTE: Val
Why are you still alive?
I want to put a pin in this and come back to this d3. I think this is a very intentional nk. But why?In post 517, MargotRosa wrote:I agree, this is weird as hell. I can't think about it too much, or else my brain will snap and the game will never end
That doesn't surprise me.In post 520, Thynhith wrote:@Darby why D3? We should be focusing on it this day. Not sure why you want to delay - your attitude is scummy to me
Perhaps, perhaps. I see your point - scum gains nothing directly from killing Galron, so it's possible they're trying to throw us off. Better to ignore Galron's NK for now. In the meantime I'll read over Galron's isoIn post 522, DArby wrote:That doesn't surprise me.In post 520, Thynhith wrote:@Darby why D3? We should be focusing on it this day. Not sure why you want to delay - your attitude is scummy to me
I want to delay it d3 because we don't have an established pattern of night kills and I feel it's intentional misdirect but I can't prove it. Ireallydon't want to have a d1 2.0 where it's filled with WIFOM.