In post 843, Prism wrote:Let me be more specific: Why was I simultaneously your top scumread and top choice toprotect?
I want to point out that while this would be a valid reason to JK me, this is the exact opposite of what you said in the post that you had prepared overnight to copy/paste.In post 844, MargotRosa wrote:The point was that I was going to jail you irrespective. Like, if you are scum d1, jailing you means I either prevent a NK, or prevent scum PR depending on whether you were goon or PR (and assuming we weren't in the column 3 setup)
"Prism was most likely to be targeted" in this context means "most likely to be nightkilled"In post 830, MargotRosa wrote:I JKed Prism n1,because I thought that Prism was most likely to be targeted d1.(I crumbed that I would do this in post 361.)
There is a way to salvage this, which is that this is a secondary reason to the reason in the world where I am town. There is no reason to think this was secondary, though, because I was your top scumread at the time you softed.
This doesn't see to indicate anything about me being town in the wake of the wagons.In post 842, MargotRosa wrote:I worked out that,given how wagons seemed to be going in this game, I'd be safe to just indicate who I was going to jail by making sure that I had jailed them(and had some vague ideas to change my vote after e-0 had been reached if I needed to)
I would appreciate some explanation of why I was "most likely to be targeted [by the nightkill]" at the time of 360. Looking at your claim that the pick was motivated by the wagons at the time makes this even worse. 339 is nearly identical to the vote count at the time of 360. The wagons are...RegRider with 2 votes and myself with 2 votes.