Manatee's Pokemon Large Theme | Game Over

Firebringer · Post Post #1925 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2021 4:22 pm

In post 1922, SirCakez wrote:Wis!scum would have probably tried to mislim me this game lmao

he did say that shooting u would be good idea lol

chowchow · Post Post #1926 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2021 4:23 pm

In post 1921, SirCakez wrote:What if chow-chow is scum
Tinfoil

In post 849, chowchow wrote:
VOTE: gypyx
~ chowchow

In post 941, chowchow wrote:chow is pleased (with this wagon). chowchow does not believe in Gypyx and chow trusts (in chowchow)

-chow

In post 1592, chowchow wrote:Wisdom case the Woochow so chow feels great about voting them please

VOTE: Woolax

-chow

In post 1596, chowchow wrote:Woolax is few posts and low energy for hydra so chow votes based on the stats of scum hydras doing this sometimes

-chow

chow...chow? ~ chowchow

Milobird · Post Post #1927 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2021 4:24 pm

In post 1923, SirCakez wrote:Cuz he could definitely done it he's done it multiple times before

I would have blocked it despite you being a Baka

DkKoba · Post Post #1928 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2021 4:24 pm

can we focus on whats actually happened this game and not what "could have" and didnt because that is a terrible way to scumhunt and easily worked around from scum pov.

Firebringer · Post Post #1929 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2021 4:25 pm

so scum are most likely asleep at wheel here. i guess i feel like i need to update my pokeboxes here.

DkKoba · Post Post #1930 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2021 4:26 pm

In post 1926, chowchow wrote:
In post 1921, SirCakez wrote:What if chow-chow is scum
Tinfoil

In post 849, chowchow wrote:
VOTE: gypyx
~ chowchow

In post 941, chowchow wrote:chow is pleased (with this wagon). chowchow does not believe in Gypyx and chow trusts (in chowchow)

-chow

In post 1592, chowchow wrote:Wisdom case the Woochow so chow feels great about voting them please

VOTE: Woolax

-chow

In post 1596, chowchow wrote:Woolax is few posts and low energy for hydra so chow votes based on the stats of scum hydras doing this sometimes

-chow
chow...chow? ~ chowchow

can you explain both votes? because they could have just as well been TMI based on the lack of thoughts shown behind them here. (i haven't read your ISO yet so I would need to confirm but having voted scum in a 5 scum team dynamic is not clearing enough - there's always the archaetype that likes to bus early to make it far)

Milobird · Post Post #1931 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2021 4:26 pm

Fire I already gave you another answer you need to check off the box

Firebringer · Post Post #1932 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2021 4:27 pm

answer to what

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #1933 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2021 4:27 pm

In post 1922, SirCakez wrote:Wis!scum would have probably tried to mislim me this game lmao

In post 1923, SirCakez wrote:Cuz he could definitely done it he's done it multiple times before

Idk whether you’re on the level but yeah his approach to slots that seem like easy mislims doesn’t feel like trying to put them down or whatever

Milobird · Post Post #1934 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2021 4:28 pm

In post 1932, Firebringer wrote:answer to what

Who needs to be put in the naughty poke box

Looking at wheme here

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #1935 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2021 4:28 pm

sup firebringer

join my scum team?

DkKoba · Post Post #1936 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2021 4:29 pm

frankly i dont think wisdom's treatment of slots around woolax was towny and indicated TMI that woolax was flipping scum and he wanted to set up mislims after bussing woolax and getting cred off it - but also searching for options outside of limming woolax - as well as having a pillow opinion on another flipped scum.

like frankly you need to provide a good towncase for me to consider wisdom town here because the more i read into wisdom the more i see the agenda being much more likely there.

Firebringer · Post Post #1937 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2021 4:29 pm

In post 1934, Milobird wrote:
In post 1932, Firebringer wrote:answer to what
Who needs to be put in the naughty poke box

Looking at wheme here

Meh. Not feeling strongly either way here. What u got for me bud

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #1938 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2021 4:29 pm

i haven't read shit btw

i literally only replaced into this game cuz I saw firebringer was playing

and i was like

that's my dude

Milobird · Post Post #1939 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2021 4:29 pm

In post 1938, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i haven't read shit btw

i literally only replaced into this game cuz I saw firebringer was playing

and i was like

that's my dude

So much for mateys

chowchow · Post Post #1940 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2021 4:30 pm

~chowchow

Firebringer · Post Post #1941 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2021 4:30 pm

In post 1935, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:sup firebringer

join my scum team?

next game this time im doing the whole "team town" shtick, i know so out of character. we can be friends tho i have plenty of scum friends

Milobird · Post Post #1942 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2021 4:31 pm

In post 1937, Firebringer wrote:
In post 1934, Milobird wrote:
In post 1932, Firebringer wrote:answer to what
Who needs to be put in the naughty poke box

Looking at wheme here
Meh. Not feeling strongly either way here. What u got for me bud

I feel like he’d have found something more to dig into as town and he felt way too loosey goosey unsure of how to engage here

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #1943 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2021 4:31 pm

In post 1845, DkKoba wrote:im at the point in my mafia "career" where explaining reads is something ive realized is pointless for players I have experience with - u either trust my process or you dont.

i also wanted to dunk on koba for this post cuz lololol trustfall lololol

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #1944 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2021 4:31 pm

In post 1939, Milobird wrote:
In post 1938, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i haven't read shit btw

i literally only replaced into this game cuz I saw firebringer was playing

and i was like

that's my dude

So much for mateys

who r u again

Firebringer · Post Post #1945 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2021 4:32 pm

In post 1942, Milobird wrote:
In post 1937, Firebringer wrote:
In post 1934, Milobird wrote:
In post 1932, Firebringer wrote:answer to what
Who needs to be put in the naughty poke box

Looking at wheme here
Meh. Not feeling strongly either way here. What u got for me bud
I feel like he’d have found something more to dig into as town and he felt way too loosey goosey unsure of how to engage here

that might be a good case. i have no idea, cause him being aimless is like 90% of my experience with him in games.

DkKoba · Post Post #1946 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2021 4:32 pm

I'm going to need wisdom to explain why they were scumreading kyouko now that we know she is town.

Firebringer · Post Post #1947 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2021 4:32 pm

In post 1943, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
In post 1845, DkKoba wrote:im at the point in my mafia "career" where explaining reads is something ive realized is pointless for players I have experience with - u either trust my process or you dont.

i also wanted to dunk on koba for this post cuz lololol trustfall lololol

u can ignore koba this game. shea was super townie.

DkKoba · Post Post #1948 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2021 4:33 pm

In post 1943, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
In post 1845, DkKoba wrote:im at the point in my mafia "career" where explaining reads is something ive realized is pointless for players I have experience with - u either trust my process or you dont.

i also wanted to dunk on koba for this post cuz lololol trustfall lololol

but also consider: https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=87720

DkKoba · Post Post #1949 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2021 4:33 pm

hey scum team: i'm not rolestopping firebringer tonight.

free food. enjoy.