The fact that Lady Tammy even deigns this game worthy enough of her time that she talk to us lowly plebes indicates the purity of her heartsong.In post 277, Tammy wrote:I’m posting.In post 275, Prism wrote:Can you elaborate on what would hypothetically make this a masterpiece?
Infy if you're going to post irrelevant gibberish you must do so with sufficient quantity and humor such that people don't notice you are mostly posting irrelevant gibberish.In post 298, Infinity 324 wrote:imo you're being too paranoid. just because you've falsely cleared people for similar reasons in the past doesn't make them invalid.In post 276, Tammy wrote:Nope. I pretty much have a healthy dose of suspicion of everyone here right now.
oops i forgot, wisdom's alignment doesn't matterIn post 301, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Infy if you're going to post irrelevant gibberish you must do so with sufficient quantity and humor such that people don't notice you are mostly posting irrelevant gibberish.In post 298, Infinity 324 wrote:imo you're being too paranoid. just because you've falsely cleared people for similar reasons in the past doesn't make them invalid.In post 276, Tammy wrote:Nope. I pretty much have a healthy dose of suspicion of everyone here right now.
just pings? or do we have something to go back and forth onIn post 302, Infinity 324 wrote:i don't have too many thoughts yet. prism feels somewhat towny, the early townread on pooky was kinda serious, mafman pings me a little but i don't have anything concrete.
In post 290, Prism wrote:I guess part of my hesitation here is that so much of this is self-facing, and reacting to my wrong expectations to ameliorate me. There's no weaponization of the expectations you have for me, and that throws me. I was surprised to see you drop the explanation about my preference so quickly. It is a perceptive and clear divergence.
I'm not ameliorating you; I'm just existing. I mean maybe I am? But it's not purposeful. I expect you to question me and you are. I'm sorry if I'm being weird; I'm tired, don't feel all that great, and am in a bit of a weird headspace being here today. I don't know that without that if I'd be much different, maybe I'd have more energy I don't know. I don't think I'm being very off but maybe I am.In post 291, Prism wrote:Like I'm astounded that you took the preference seriously enough to remember it and you make the connection. No one else onsite evenremembersthe preference let alone uses it.
it doesn't seem that different to me tbh? it looks like you're trying to sort tammy, and not trying to take control of the gamestate, which is pretty townyIn post 305, Prism wrote:The difference between this game and every other one you have played with me is vast, Infinity. Does this sound no alarm bells?
i would, in all honesty, trust the first person who trusts meIn post 281, Prism wrote:So far I'd trust literally no one, which kind of owns
just pings, mostly you're sorting but not particularly townilyIn post 306, MafMen wrote:just pings? or do we have something to go back and forth onIn post 302, Infinity 324 wrote:i don't have too many thoughts yet. prism feels somewhat towny, the early townread on pooky was kinda serious, mafman pings me a little but i don't have anything concrete.
I'm not paranoid at all. Not yet. We're under 20 pages in the first 24 hours of the game, and nobody has done anything that to me reads very town for any decent reason. That's just how it goes sometimes.In post 298, Infinity 324 wrote:imo you're being too paranoid. just because you've falsely cleared people for similar reasons in the past doesn't make them invalid.In post 276, Tammy wrote:Nope. I pretty much have a healthy dose of suspicion of everyone here right now.
I was in a very amused headspace!In post 310, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Lady Tammy could you explain the feelings/headspace you were in when you made this following post?
Spoiler: Shockingly Scandalous
i get that alotIn post 311, Infinity 324 wrote:just pings, mostly you're sorting but not particularly townilyIn post 306, MafMen wrote:just pings? or do we have something to go back and forth onIn post 302, Infinity 324 wrote:i don't have too many thoughts yet. prism feels somewhat towny, the early townread on pooky was kinda serious, mafman pings me a little but i don't have anything concrete.
I was flattered that y'all were talking about me and whether or not I could be trusted such that you wanted to test it.In post 314, Tammy wrote:I was in a very amused headspace!In post 310, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Lady Tammy could you explain the feelings/headspace you were in when you made this following post?
Spoiler: Shockingly Scandalous
Can you be more specific what "take control of the gamestate" means? I ask because I have never seen this phrase used in a way that convinces me it is more than snake oil.In post 308, Infinity 324 wrote:it doesn't seem that different to me tbh? it looks like you're trying to sort tammy, and not trying to take control of the gamestate, which is pretty townyIn post 305, Prism wrote:The difference between this game and every other one you have played with me is vast, Infinity. Does this sound no alarm bells?
felt like the worst sus was pretty bad so i asked faer about it, besides that nothing whyIn post 312, MafMen wrote:whats everyones read on cookie?
i feel even with those 3 posts fae have made some of the most ai posts yet
ebwopIn post 312, MafMen wrote:whats everyones read on cookie?
i feel even with those 3 posts fae has* made some of the most ai posts yet
No I didn't think anyone would actually do it. It just amused me to kind of taunt you guys about it.In post 318, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:did you think I would trust you just because you asked?
I'm pockited but i'm not likethatpockitedyet
besides leaving with you now would mean I can't like flirt with you anymore :<
normally i'd expect town to care about what they care about and good scum players to take a broader view of the game, interact with a lot of players, since that's how players tend to get influence in mafia games imeIn post 317, Prism wrote:Can you be more specific what "take control of the gamestate" means? I ask because I have never seen this phrase used in a way that convinces me it is more than snake oil.In post 308, Infinity 324 wrote:it doesn't seem that different to me tbh? it looks like you're trying to sort tammy, and not trying to take control of the gamestate, which is pretty townyIn post 305, Prism wrote:The difference between this game and every other one you have played with me is vast, Infinity. Does this sound no alarm bells?
I sort players every game. I use it as pretense to manipulate them every game. Where is the difference? I had "control" over most of the "gamestate" our first run of this and used it to shut out catboi and amplify HEM. I was town. While it took me awhile to get it in grasp, I was firm and a dominant voice all of Forest Fire, and leveraged it into an unpopular scumflip and a controversial second.