Open 834: Trust Fall - Game Over
Forum rules
- MafMen
-
MafMen Mafia Scum
- MafMen
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1075
- Joined: May 6, 2018
- Location: UTC -7
using the day 1 trustfall to probe rather than take it safe is the best option
its the same logic as nolimming day 1 or risking a mislim
pedit: "one of them" a.k.a "any""I find myself agreeing with MafMen through most of this argument, while also finding him most likely to be scum out of him/Wisdom/Pooky"
~ Klick- MafMen
-
MafMen Mafia Scum
- MafMen
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1075
- Joined: May 6, 2018
- Location: UTC -7
- Wisdom
-
Wisdom Of the One
- Wisdom
- Wisdom
-
Wisdom Of the One
- Wisdom
- Wisdom
-
Wisdom Of the One
- Wisdom
- Enchant
-
Enchant Jack of All Trades
- Enchant
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9432
- Joined: November 18, 2020
In standart "7 ppl, 2 are scum" game, eliming one townie is 50% of win.In post 1253, Wisdom wrote:But its definitely not the same
If we risk it here and scum exit, scum have 50% won
If we mislim in a regular game, we just lose a townie
It's basically same, but reversed.- Wisdom
-
Wisdom Of the One
- Wisdom
- Wisdom
-
Wisdom Of the One
- Wisdom
- Enchant
-
Enchant Jack of All Trades
- Enchant
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9432
- Joined: November 18, 2020
- Wisdom
-
Wisdom Of the One
- Wisdom
- Enchant
-
Enchant Jack of All Trades
- Enchant
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9432
- Joined: November 18, 2020
- Wisdom
-
Wisdom Of the One
- Wisdom
- MafMen
-
MafMen Mafia Scum
- MafMen
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1075
- Joined: May 6, 2018
- Location: UTC -7
- MafMen
-
MafMen Mafia Scum
- MafMen
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1075
- Joined: May 6, 2018
- Location: UTC -7
- Wisdom
-
Wisdom Of the One
- Wisdom
- Wisdom
-
Wisdom Of the One
- Wisdom
- MafMen
-
MafMen Mafia Scum
- MafMen
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1075
- Joined: May 6, 2018
- Location: UTC -7
crazy idea that sending out a lowposting, wide townleaned player, is a better alternative than sending out those twoIn post 1264, Wisdom wrote:Are they consensus townreads?
Are they safe to trust?
You openly said its the same as a mislim so you admitted theyre not safe
and i dont know why you think you have some kind of fucking 'gotcha' moment when suggesting me to use my trust on one of those three if i think its a good idea, i dont want to leave
p-edit: arent you the one who trusted tw/tammy in the first place before people confidently townread them? hypocritical bullshit"I find myself agreeing with MafMen through most of this argument, while also finding him most likely to be scum out of him/Wisdom/Pooky"
~ Klick- Enchant
-
Enchant Jack of All Trades
- Enchant
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9432
- Joined: November 18, 2020
I supported idea "If you strongly believe someone outside Wisdom/The worst/Tammy is town, you can trust them"In post 1261, Wisdom wrote:Good because for a moment I thought you were supporting him
Just pooking with trust on random are horrible idea (especially now with half of town are almost confirmed) and reason we lost previous game.
AGAIN:
Low risk, Low reward is where they trust with each other.
High Risk, High reward is where they trust with someone outside, thus reducing POE but risking hitting scum more likely.
I prefer low, but clearly will not oppose anyone if they strongly believe someone else is town.- MafMen
-
MafMen Mafia Scum
- MafMen
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1075
- Joined: May 6, 2018
- Location: UTC -7
i never vouched for 'random players'In post 1267, Enchant wrote:
I supported idea "If you strongly believe someone outside Wisdom/The worst/Tammy is town, you can trust them"In post 1261, Wisdom wrote:Good because for a moment I thought you were supporting him
Just pooking with trust on random are horrible idea (especially now with half of town are almost confirmed) and reason we lost previous game.
AGAIN:
Low risk, Low reward is where they trust with each other.
High Risk, High reward is where they trust with someone outside, thus reducing POE but risking hitting scum more likely.
I prefer low, but clearly will not oppose anyone if they strongly believe someone else is town.
mostly everybody has good feelings about the three players i mentioned"I find myself agreeing with MafMen through most of this argument, while also finding him most likely to be scum out of him/Wisdom/Pooky"
~ Klick- Wisdom
-
Wisdom Of the One
- Wisdom
- Of the One
- Of the One
- Posts: 51319
- Joined: September 20, 2012
Tw was consensus and already trusted by Enchant, so just TammyIn post 1266, MafMen wrote:p-edit: arent you the one who trusted tw/tammy in the first place before people confidently townread them? hypocritical bullshit
The difference, again, is that I trusted my read and took the risk to progress the game
Youre not doing that because you are afraid to take such stances
Youre content arguing generic bs instead- Enchant
-
Enchant Jack of All Trades
- Enchant
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9432
- Joined: November 18, 2020
Can you repeat for me again, please?In post 1268, MafMen wrote:
i never vouched for 'random players'In post 1267, Enchant wrote:
I supported idea "If you strongly believe someone outside Wisdom/The worst/Tammy is town, you can trust them"In post 1261, Wisdom wrote:Good because for a moment I thought you were supporting him
Just pooking with trust on random are horrible idea (especially now with half of town are almost confirmed) and reason we lost previous game.
AGAIN:
Low risk, Low reward is where they trust with each other.
High Risk, High reward is where they trust with someone outside, thus reducing POE but risking hitting scum more likely.
I prefer low, but clearly will not oppose anyone if they strongly believe someone else is town.
mostly everybody has good feelings about the three players i mentioned- MafMen
-
MafMen Mafia Scum
- MafMen
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1075
- Joined: May 6, 2018
- Location: UTC -7
its a very simple ass fucking statement but wisdom always has to find a goddamn way to make everything more complex
as enchant said it is opting for a high risk high reward over a low risk low reward situation but your arrogant ass has to spin everything into a negative viewpoint
p-edit: my only message was that i think we should shoot in one of the lowposters (who most of which are townleaned) instead of getting rid of tw/tammy"I find myself agreeing with MafMen through most of this argument, while also finding him most likely to be scum out of him/Wisdom/Pooky"
~ Klick- Wisdom
-
Wisdom Of the One
- Wisdom
- Of the One
- Of the One
- Posts: 51319
- Joined: September 20, 2012
Yep change your tune nowIn post 1268, MafMen wrote:i never vouched for 'random players'
mostly everybody has good feelings about the three players i mentioned
Its not like you compared it to a mislim or anything- MafMen
-
MafMen Mafia Scum
- MafMen
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1075
- Joined: May 6, 2018
- Location: UTC -7
yes blame me for arguing random bullshit when youre the one who spun everything up in the first placeIn post 1269, Wisdom wrote:
Tw was consensus and already trusted by Enchant, so just TammyIn post 1266, MafMen wrote:p-edit: arent you the one who trusted tw/tammy in the first place before people confidently townread them? hypocritical bullshit
The difference, again, is that I trusted my read and took the risk to progress the game
Youre not doing that because you are afraid to take such stances
Youre content arguing generic bs instead
tw was about as consensus as enchant, infinity, and cookie are now, same with tammy
im starting to get what pooky meant by you playing unilaterally"I find myself agreeing with MafMen through most of this argument, while also finding him most likely to be scum out of him/Wisdom/Pooky"
~ KlickCopyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- MafMen
- Wisdom
- MafMen
- Enchant
- Wisdom
- MafMen
- Enchant
- MafMen
- MafMen
- MafMen
- Enchant
- Enchant
- Enchant
- MafMen
- MafMen