But that's a panda not a bearIn post 624, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i dont care
WAIT! Spotted you. 90 seconds in
But that's a panda not a bearIn post 624, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i dont care
In post 622, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i dunno how much harder cows can scumtell for you guys
it is p funny
he’s obvious scum and you don’t care? Weird mindset if you’re townIn post 624, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i dont care
you're quite unpleasant alreadyIn post 633, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:im not going to let myself get tilted by people not listening to me
i am quite unpleasant when i do that
pooky any thoughts on this?In post 597, innocentvillager wrote:okay let's just look at the list thenIn post 567, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:in this game you just kill the people who werent voting for him on d1 duhIn post 565, innocentvillager wrote:pooky can you give a list of some potential partners of cowsEnchant, schadd, innocentvillager, A50, Strange, numberQIn post 369, Not_Mafia wrote:
this is the list of players who haven't voted cows
if cows is scum, we'd expect the two partners to be here right under this logic?
If Pooky is town then i don't see why Enchant is being so vitriolic about defending Pooky so it's probably not cows/Enchant/non-pooky, also Pooky is just town for the votepark
schadd seems fine and at least is defending you and now is even pushing back to cows when the wagon on you is very unstable. Again schadd/cows/non-pooky doesn't make sense.
I'm not scum, ive been p townie on dayplay i feel
A50 is clear town on dayplay
leaves like, exactly Strange and numberQ
The only like, maybe scum voting for scum!cows is clemency? but it seems too theatre so i don't really believe it
are there parts of this people disagree with
preface: i wanna say this sort of moment in the game opens up a lot of weird potential lines of behavior from scum. like if your partner is getting really wagoned i think the obvious archetypical response is for scum to aggressively mount other wagons/defend your partner. but i think a lot of people really hate doing that, people don't like to powerwolf on here. and you know since its the obvious thing to do its more nerve wracking. i wanna say i've seen a sort of death instinct kick in for scumteams in this sort of situation, like "well things are looking bad, how about i just bus you and hope that people get cold feet or something". i would still be disinclined to think of people on cows' wagon as partners (simply not voting your partner is safe and not nerve wracking at all really) but i would similarly be disinclined to straight up rule out a bunch of partners. moreover the T3 and charlemagne votes moved which puts them pretty comfortably outside of that rule-out range for me. naively clemency pulling up with a hard chainsaw vote on pooky seems like a thing for a cows partner to do but yeah its kind of hard to see that
looking at the iso & thinking of posts that seem to be thinking about his motives externally: 101 "the post you quoted is textbook scum" (hilariously a post charlemagne called out as scummy), 159 particularly "my top town are off the wagon" maybe as opposed to like "i tr the people off the wagon", 201 "i dont have any suspects" as opposed to something like "i'm not scumreading anyone right now" / "everyone looks like town" (theres a lot of room for this & 159 to just be meaningless semantic distinctions & i'm just recording what i'm thinking about really)In post 602, innocentvillager wrote:schadd are there other particular posts that you think are potentially reflective of the scum mindset you described?
one thing i did feel is: i don't think anyone like strongly townreads him or has really expressed much of an opinion about him so i think the fact that his tone and playstyle isn't really changing throughout all of that is like slightly town!indicative