This metareading is totally garbage.In post 1573, T3 wrote:I remember gera being this low energy as town too so I'll give him a pass.In post 1479, Wiki wrote:Talking about gera's meta on day1 is so nonsense
In LN 232 I tried to bus my scumpartners so hard that I'd be limmed and they'd be cleared. So that game is just bad to meta me byIn post 1484, Andresvmb wrote:I yelled that they were Scum in a game absurdly loudly and I was correct. I’ve also correctly TR them before. But I have been wrong on them in the first game we played together (though I was right that they put out a bullshit role claim which frankly drove my suspicion).In post 1483, Dwlee99 wrote:Do you know how to read t3, Andres?
I would say the main reason I’m voting there is because they have a complete opposite worldview to mine (though they TR me). I just think it’s a decent place to start.
mastinaIn post 1491, Looker wrote:Extremely subjective IMO. Is there some standard, non-evolving method of reading a particular player that can be publicized and referenced?In post 1483, Dwlee99 wrote:Do you know how to read t3, Andres?
salsa does ate as either alignment thoughIn post 1497, Dwlee99 wrote:PoE + she is tonally scummy and is doing some ridiculous ate stuff but when does she not amirite
because all the discussion involved icoIn post 1521, Datisi wrote:@t3, is there a reason why most of your catchup today is shitting on ico, but you're still voting salsa?
and the game when we were buddies ahhh i like this postIn post 1540, geraintm wrote:i am of the opinion that the games i roll scum i am awful and if people leave me alone i will screw it up for scum.In post 1504, Datisi wrote:i mean, my read on gera is 2/2 so far and also not like i have much to work with on day 1
i think i am very easy to read, but htat is just me
*shrug*In post 1543, Selynee wrote:K, I wasn't killed by a serial killer in the park (just my luck) so...
Faria- Actually don't find much mafia motivation with her entry. Faking believing the claim would have been something if she could get an easy miselim (like if any of them were at E-1 or something) but none were in danger of being elim. Plus stuff like calling for a policy elim doesn't seem like coming from someone who wants to be seen as town cuz from my limited experience, this usually isn't popular.
T3- Not a fan of their progression. Not helped by the fact that he doesn't really provides much info but like 375 says Three's read is made in bad faith but votes me in 377. 521- honestly, don't get why they are only suspecting me of pocketing when the same argument can be used that you were pocketing Datisi or Wiki by agreeing with them. Also, not a fan of the progression on salsa-516- meta stuff, 936- honestly don't see what's so bad in that reaction. 956- asks about scum motivations here but doesn't insist on this. 959- agrees with Andre's case. And that's basically all. No longer question Salsa read. Seems a superficial read there.
Ico- Did I say I don't like early reads? Cuz they lack consistency- like, if you say you townread someone on page 5 and scumread them on page 25, you can easily say "Well, the first one was just early vibes, now I no longer feel the same vibes" and this can easily come from both mafia or town.
Like, I actually like 352 and 368. Feels like a genuine attempt to make sense of Wiki's fake claim. And their early points on Almost. Plus from all the reasons they could give for voting me there, don't think mafia would come with 1374
In 9 situations of 10 it is typical mafia behaviour.In post 1584, Wiki wrote:99% of his posts are his defending himself, all the game.
Yep, all my posts are defending myself because I have almost no interest in looking over what others are doing.In post 1584, Wiki wrote:Vote gera
Vote gera
Vote gera
99% of his posts are his defending himself, all the game.
He pretends he doesnt know normal roles and believed in a fakeclaim.
We found 1 mafia for sure.
Dont use shitty meta of a player who is doing nothing, this "meta" is garbage, throw it away from your heads and play normally
I go sleeping
I have never said I was a newbie.In post 1585, Wiki wrote:In 9 situations of 10 it is typical mafia behaviour.In post 1584, Wiki wrote:99% of his posts are his defending himself, all the game.
Only selfdefending and complaints, selfdefending and complaints, and pretending a newbie
2006.
And he messed up with his post about 857 times wrong and trying to explain that thought like there was only 1 thing that was wrong for him lol. I think he knew roles in that qoute, thats why he said (not only about himself).
My argument isn’t based on meta. That should be pretty clear from my post.In post 1576, T3 wrote:In LN 232 I tried to bus my scumpartners so hard that I'd be limmed and they'd be cleared. So that game is just bad to meta me byIn post 1484, Andresvmb wrote:I yelled that they were Scum in a game absurdly loudly and I was correct. I’ve also correctly TR them before. But I have been wrong on them in the first game we played together (though I was right that they put out a bullshit role claim which frankly drove my suspicion).In post 1483, Dwlee99 wrote:Do you know how to read t3, Andres?
I would say the main reason I’m voting there is because they have a complete opposite worldview to mine (though they TR me). I just think it’s a decent place to start.
They’re not 100% anything like stop with the garbage takes. When people make arguments based on meta to defend geraintm here, it’s not what you’re understanding at all. The argument isn’t geraintm is Town because they’re doing nothing D1. It’s geraintm has done this exact same thing as Town in the past, so it isn’t alignment indicative in the way you’re making it out to be. There’s a massive difference there. I don’t claim to know for sure what geraintm’s alignment is here. What I am arguing though is that geraintm has the capacity to town tell in future days, and there’s too much risk in pushing there right now given the structure of the game. geraintm isn’t getting a permanent pass from me. I just think there’s better slots to push.In post 1577, Wiki wrote:Gera is 100% scum.
P sure t3 just periodically does thatIn post 1592, Andresvmb wrote:It’s interesting that the minute that I started arguing for T3 to be pushed and they gather some votes, T3 starts posting a lot to increase their thread presence (probably to diffuse pressure). Not sure what it means yet.
@Datisi can you update this take? This is the last time you expressed a read on T3. And you’ve only asked a single question there after that as far as I can tell.In post 419, Datisi wrote: t3 is being weird and opportunistic-y and i'm still trying to figure out how to read him
Okay. Do you think T3 is Town?In post 1593, Dwlee99 wrote:P sure t3 just periodically does thatIn post 1592, Andresvmb wrote:It’s interesting that the minute that I started arguing for T3 to be pushed and they gather some votes, T3 starts posting a lot to increase their thread presence (probably to diffuse pressure). Not sure what it means yet.
yeah ikIn post 1589, Andresvmb wrote:My argument isn’t based on meta. That should be pretty clear from my post.In post 1576, T3 wrote:In LN 232 I tried to bus my scumpartners so hard that I'd be limmed and they'd be cleared. So that game is just bad to meta me byIn post 1484, Andresvmb wrote:I yelled that they were Scum in a game absurdly loudly and I was correct. I’ve also correctly TR them before. But I have been wrong on them in the first game we played together (though I was right that they put out a bullshit role claim which frankly drove my suspicion).In post 1483, Dwlee99 wrote:Do you know how to read t3, Andres?
I would say the main reason I’m voting there is because they have a complete opposite worldview to mine (though they TR me). I just think it’s a decent place to start.
my posting almost entirely depends on my scheduleIn post 1592, Andresvmb wrote:It’s interesting that the minute that I started arguing for T3 to be pushed and they gather some votes, T3 starts posting a lot to increase their thread presence (probably to diffuse pressure). Not sure what it means yet.