UNVOTE: Looker
VOTE: Dorsey
If A50 is town here, they are useful. Yeah, based on one game but they were smart there.In post 1949, Wiki wrote:Go elim a50 or gera and go to the night.
If smb of them is green, this is not a big problem.
We need info
So no?In post 1719, Looker wrote:In post 1637, Iconeum wrote:@Andres do you honestly like the sheeple you have with you?
Doesn't dorsey look like a juicy wagon to you?
I'd be down running up Looker as an alternative, what do you think about that?Would you like to explain? Y/N?
?In post 1719, Looker wrote:In post 1642, Iconeum wrote:datisi/andres/wiki/dwlee townIn post 1640, Datisi wrote:it's fair, dorsey's vote feels gross enough to poison the whole well
what's your shotgun reads looking like right now? i have class in about 3 minutes, but i do wanna solve with you a bit, if only our schedules were lining up >_>
gera/sely/three/salsa/a50 exist. Wiki's pressure on gera make me wanna defend gera, but he's null. The others i could probably make a case for either allignment if i wanted to.
T3 i really don't like how he's been poking me without really engaging me, but that's like the full extent of suspicion i have there
and i didn't like GE beforei really don't like lookers entry
Dorsey is so bleh and their T3 vote is very opportunistic i feel - now drawing the 'boohoo look at me everyone's mad at me' card is really unimpressive
i'd love a good wagon on either dorsey or looker hereIs it because I questioned your friend?
Which post was this explanation?In post 1755, Datisi wrote:wouldn't it be really fucking hilarious if i now said that i think dorsey is town?
i think it would
(:
VOTE: three
scum!three spews dorsey!town and three just nosedived in my reads
will properly explain within the next 1-5 business hours, stay tuned
In post 1776, Datisi wrote:wiki, can you stop pretending like you're a fucking moron who learned about the game of mafia yesterday
you were giving me shit earlier for "not having any progression on you and never considering you scum" (despite that being untrue!) and now you're pretending like i just randomly called dorsey scum after calling them town with no reasoning or explanation
get your head out of your own fucking ass because you're showing time and time again you don't know shit about this game
What's the difference between heated and flail? Also, which good part of the game is not playing, as in player names?In post 1780, Datisi wrote:i'm getting heated because a good part of the game is not playing, so if they're town the game is unnecessarily harder, wiki is being denser than a neutron star and refusing to listen to *anything reasonable* someone else is saying, and i'm seeing so much pussyfooting around my slot but almost nobody is willing to actually go and talk to me or argue
like how tf am i supposed to not get pissed at this game?
In post 1793, T3 wrote:A50 if you're negative utility then just say so
Do I think Datisi is this sloppy? I think that would require me to think that this current game is sloppy, which I don't. As for Datisi, I don't think he's a sloppy player - I'm sure every one of his moves is perfectly logical to him. "Sloppy" is subjective and kind of negative.In post 1801, Salsabil Faria wrote:@Looker, my read onDatisiis actually based on meta but not only meta. The way he goes withWiki&Three, it clearly takes lots of attention which no scum want in D1 in general basis. Though I don’t know his scum meta but as an experienced player, do you think scum!Datisiis this much sloppy? Plus, his sorting style is kind of like that, he will keep asking the same question until his satisfaction (which is annoying tbh ). But I'll look onto your case later, busy rn (this game is giving me headache also).
In post 1820, Datisi wrote:Spoiler:
"contradictions" and cheap potshots that i hate, other than the ones already pointed out above:
- 1496 is misrepping my reasoning for voting dorsey and making a "contradiction" out of it (though this one *can* be forgiven if you're newly in the game, etc)
- 1513 is once again doing that, and it's asking a very leading question that makes me look bad no matter how i answer
- 1533 was also showing my vote in the worst light possible
- most of the rest of the convo around pages 61-62 felt like it was made in the sort of condescending looking-for-a-gotcha tone, like asking me about my gut-based reads or asking which players do i think contributed the most
- yes, sorting is using the things you're hearing and making ai conclusions out of it. shading is responding in a way that's *clearly* meant to imply you think the person is scummy, but not outright saying it nor providing any concrete reasoning, just painting it in a bad light and lettign the audience draw their own conclusions, so to speak
- i'd say so, scum!iconeum hasn't ever approached me like this, and this game is far more effort from him than i'd expect if he randed scum 5th game in a row. i'll admit i'm not willing to bet the game on it yet, but so far he reads town to me.
- the townread on andres was literally explained in the post you linked (other than the meta/gut of him feeling like he usually does, but i know you don't care about that), dorsey i'd also explained and you shot it down as me wagoning the lowest content slot, sel has just felt... solvey? i can go over her slot later, don't feel too much like doing it right this moment bc she's not under fire and holy shit do i have things to respond to in the thread
- yes, call that special relationship "knowing who a50 is".
- again this feels like a bad faith leading question. obviously patterns and inconsistencies are a way of finding scum. but it's also pretty known that some inconsistencies that appear scummy do come from town, because town makes mistakes too. especially if they're as forced as you're making mine out to be >_>
- i've been a proponent of gutreads ever since i joined this site, if i have to be digging quotes where i say that, i'm gonna lose it
fuck me the pedits
I'm starting to think you're not almost 50 years old...In post 1840, Almost50 wrote:No. The joke was I used the GIF for DO IT by Chloe & Halle
uselessIn post 1952, Selynee wrote:If A50 is town here, they are useful. Yeah, based on one game but they were smart there.In post 1949, Wiki wrote:Go elim a50 or gera and go to the night.
If smb of them is green, this is not a big problem.
We need info
In post 1950, Salsabil Faria wrote:@A50, your sudden (& so much) love for me is making me falling hard for you
Spoiler: For A50
I actually want to voteThreebut it'll be more biasness than a scumread, so won't vote there for now.
UNVOTE: Looker
VOTE: Dorsey
In post 1957, Dorsey wrote:Salsa loves A50 so much she gave him her Wi-Fi password
threeIn post 1896, Dwlee99 wrote:How about this....give me your most convincing scumread and like 2 or 3 sentences and I'll tell you if you're town off of it
I didn’t say influential Scum was good. That would be idiotic. It’s definitely easier to spot though. And you’re basically assuming Datisi is certain Scum. I am not assigning such high odds to Datisi flipping Scum. However, if Datisi is not Scum, them being influential is a good thing. That’s more what I meant.In post 1957, Dorsey wrote:Salsa loves A50 so much she gave him her Wi-Fi password
@Andres - How is influential scum good?
Outside of DW who you have Town locked from meta, who do you think is Town?In post 1960, T3 wrote:threeIn post 1896, Dwlee99 wrote:How about this....give me your most convincing scumread and like 2 or 3 sentences and I'll tell you if you're town off of it
he made some posts that came off as manipulative
he is approaching the game from a pov that assumes stuff
i can believe it quite easily, considering your 1773 was seeing me change my read on you, immediately jumping on voting me and calling me full of shit. that doesn't sound very interested in what i have to say. though the answers to those questions should be in 1799 and 1826.In post 1784, Three wrote:How can you actually believe I don't give a shit about why you changed your read on me? I asked how you changed your read on me so quickly with zero interaction and little content between you town reading me and then scum reading me. I asked why you think I'm scum and why you believe I spewed Dorsey as town. You're just wrong here.In post 1779, Datisi wrote:"i change my mind, three is scum, i will elaborate a bit later as i don't have time right now"
"wow what a wild progression"
like, you're just looking at the fact that i changed my read without even giving a shit why. so either you think i'm scum regardless of why my eead changed (which is bad) or you're jumping at the opportunity to attack me now that the dorsey wagon is dwindling down (which again, bad)
What makes you think I think you're scum regardless of why your read changed? What makes you think switching votes after getting a reaction to pressure,is scum-indicative?which I've literally been begging to happen for days now,
i thought i might have been confusing here, but going back to check, no, actually. you were the first one to refer to it simply as "progression". in 1773, you said "This is such a wild progression", clearly referring to me going from "leaning on town!three" to voting you. my response "i haven't had a progression on you yet" was replying to that, saying that i haven't given out my reasoning yet (so it's lowkey unfair to assume the progression is scummy etc), to which you then responded with that i have had a progression on you because i've mentioned you in my iso or whatever.In post 1784, Three wrote:I'm not a mind reader! I am going to take things literally instead of trying to guess what somebody "really means"! I'm not going to see "I don't have a progression yet" as "I don't have an updated progression yet" because it only makes sense to me that if that's what you'd meant, you would justand here's the problem i have with you, like it's plainly obvious i meant "i didn't have the most recent progression on you explained yet", because that is clearly what part of my progression you're attacking in 1773
but in 1778, you're taking the literal meaning of progression as a whole (when again, not what we're talking about) and attacking *that* part of my post, despite that not being relevant and not what we're talking about! I really don't think that's unreasonable that you should just say what you mean instead of leaving it up to interpretation in a game about communication! And I don't think it's fair that you're attacking me for being literal minded!say it
nope, i'm scumreading and attacking you for cherrypicking and misrepping the everloving shit out of my post when you realized the thread might want to yeet me.In post 1784, Three wrote:???In post 1780, Datisi wrote:i'm getting heated because a good part of the game is not playing, so if they're town the game is unnecessarily harder, wiki is being denser than a neutron star and refusing to listen to *anything reasonable* someone else is saying, and i'm seeing so much pussyfooting around my slot but almost nobody is willing to actually go and talk to me or argue
like how tf am i supposed to not get pissed at this game?
You're literally scum reading me and saying I'm attacking you for doing exactly what you're asking people to do. Maybe people don't want to deal with you because you're throwing your weight around and lashing out at anyone who dares to try to read you or argue with you?
same reason i'm ignoring ico and wiki and whoever else expressed a negative read on a50 (and before you ask, no i didn't call out ico for his a50 vote, i called him out for the timing of it, much different). i don't think that kind of lying necessarily comes from scum.In post 1933, Andresvmb wrote:They’re saying that now, after calling A50 Scum and saying their WIM indicates Scum and shading there repeatedly. Why is that being ignored?In post 1927, Iconeum wrote:how is that a read on A50In post 1921, Andresvmb wrote:Datisi thinks anyone with a read of A50 is lying basically, but somehow neglects to address this? Why?In post 1726, T3 wrote: At this point I think I know what A50 is doing (if i'm wrong then i'll look really stupid postgame )
I wasn't entirely sure if what he was doing comes from scum a50 or town a50.
it literally quotes 'i have no idea from which allignment this comes'
i can guarantee you that scumtisi has never in his life once thought that.In post 1937, Andresvmb wrote:I don’t buy in the least that Datisi thinks they could get you mis-executed easily and not pay any price for it.
youIn post 1962, Andresvmb wrote:Outside of DW who you have Town locked from meta, who do you think is Town?In post 1960, T3 wrote:threeIn post 1896, Dwlee99 wrote:How about this....give me your most convincing scumread and like 2 or 3 sentences and I'll tell you if you're town off of it
he made some posts that came off as manipulative
he is approaching the game from a pov that assumes stuff
good thing that's not what i'm arguing. they nosedived because of the shit i went into earlier. them being scum spews dorsey town, because i don't think they're scum/scum.In post 1940, Andresvmb wrote:And for the record, Three actually has a point here. Datisi arguing that Three nosedived because they spewed Dorsey Town really doesn’t make a lot of sense to me.In post 1773, Three wrote:I did what now? Dorsey is one of my scum reads?? YouIn post 1755, Datisi wrote:wouldn't it be really fucking hilarious if i now said that i think dorsey is town?
i think it would
(:
VOTE: three
scum!three spews dorsey!town and three just nosedived in my reads
will properly explain within the next 1-5 business hours, stay tunedsaid I was town ten hours prior to this, and now you're convinced that I'm scum? This is such a wild progression lmao. The more you post about me the more I just think you're full of shit.just
VOTE: Datisi
why am i a maybe? i feel like you called some bits of my posting town quite a few times recently.
andres, why am i still getting ignored wrt this?In post 1947, Andresvmb wrote:Datisi has voted Selynee (who I TR’ed), Three (who I TR’ed, though not strongly), Dorsey (who I also TR’ed based on the emotions I’m perceiving in their content), and geraintm (Null).
this is going into conspiracy theory level territoryIn post 1894, Dorsey wrote:Wow, an explosion of posts and wagon shifts to protect Datisi. That was quick. VOTE: Datisi
I jump off A50 and now all of a sudden he's scum. Datisi is the manipulator. He's also the one calling people "fucking morons" and "purposefully ignorant".
@Datisi, this paragraph is literally the explanation as to why I’m still dragging your Selynee vote despite your re-evaluation. You can be annoyed all you want, but stop repeating ad naseum I’m not responding to something when I have.In post 1932, Andresvmb wrote:
If I see that a player is acting Townier and Townier as the game goes on, to the point were people are forced to change their stances around a player, then early attempts to sideline them or push them for execution could be thought of as coming from Scum. After all, Scum want to get a mis-execution above having to execute their own Partners. It’s the same reasoning I would apply to anyone that pushed Dorsey in hindsight (particularly if Dorsey flips Town, but I have to assume it in part given my perception of the slot).
Does that make sense?
how is what i did sheepingIn post 1919, Andresvmb wrote:You know we can vote wherever we want right? Every single possible wagon has been tried by certain players but nobody is really touching my T3 case, there hasn’t been much of a disagreement from anyone really, and T3 is just constantly sheeping whatever they think will get through instead of them.In post 1917, Dorsey wrote:And @Andres, because clearly Datisi is the boss.