that's not what we did; notty just thinks you're full of shit.In post 1373, Critter wrote:A scum reaction would be to ignore it or continue to push as if it doesn’t exist.
-b
that's not what we did; notty just thinks you're full of shit.In post 1373, Critter wrote:A scum reaction would be to ignore it or continue to push as if it doesn’t exist.
That should be more convincing not less. Less pool. I don’t see how that’s less convincing to you.In post 1372, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:This is wholy unconvincing because you're forgetting we have an IC in the town and we had GE do a claim thing.In post 1364, Critter wrote:Assume for the moment that Skitter is scum. She could have easily went for “easier” elims or brought some to claim. The fact she hasn’t means one or more of the pushes done today has been on scum. There’s no reason for her to just suddenly swap her read on me like she did.In post 1363, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Feel free to spend the time convincing me. I'm not unconvincable. This is just where I landed after a game review.In post 1361, Critter wrote:I really think Skitter is town LLD. I don’t know about Lilith but the Skitter head I think is town.
I will be working all night but a promise is a promise.
What’s the vote count at?
The fact no one has been brought to E-1 and we are at like a billion pages says something.
Because VFT is one of the more active players. I think scum are in the lurkers and we can’t coordinate at all.In post 1374, Dunnstral wrote:Sure but why is that linked to VFTIn post 1364, Critter wrote:The fact no one has been brought to E-1 and we are at like a billion pages says something.
And I think your slot is scum doing good cop bad cop. I don’t see you as an experienced player being okay with what Notty is doing.In post 1375, Towelie wrote:that's not what we did; notty just thinks you're full of shit.In post 1373, Critter wrote:A scum reaction would be to ignore it or continue to push as if it doesn’t exist.
-b
that's nice but it has no basis in reality. i have no problem w/ him trying to get content out of you, esp since my reason for TRing you was something I couldn't ask about. I don't think we'd have moved to you today unless the landscape really changed.In post 1378, Critter wrote:I don’t see you as an experienced player being okay with what Notty is doing.
There’s no need for that I have plenty of content. You can easily ask about what’s there without talking about the elephant in the room. And I bet you wouldn’t move to me unless you got some sucker/scape goat to do it first. If your slot had no intention of voting me then what is the pressure for?In post 1380, Towelie wrote:that's nice but it has no basis in reality. i have no problem w/ him trying to get content out of you, esp since my reason for TRing you was something I couldn't ask about. I don't think we'd have moved to you today unless the landscape really changed.In post 1378, Critter wrote:I don’t see you as an experienced player being okay with what Notty is doing.
-b
i can just tell this conversation is going to be very productive going forwardIn post 1382, Critter wrote:And I bet you wouldn’t move to me unless you got some sucker/scape goat to do it first.
You’re right. Scum can soft PRs. That’s why you sort based on other content. I am not asking to be confirmed I am asking to be sorted. Yes I tell people they’re making a mistake because they are. If they felt strongly about it then they’d pressure me on my reads or other content.In post 1381, Towelie wrote:unless you're trying to tell me that scum have no history of softing PRs
you essentially lowered the value proposition of being wrong, which I acknowledge. you don't get to just be confirmed.
-b
you meanIn post 1385, Critter wrote:That’s why you sort based on other content
If you have no intention of voting it won’t help you get a better read though.
No he wasn’t.In post 1386, Towelie wrote:you meanIn post 1385, Critter wrote:That’s why you sort based on other content
like he
was doing
fuck dude
-b
i'm not really willing to move this into a conversation of how to develop reads. i don't see why your philosophy here should have any bearing on my alignmentIn post 1387, Critter wrote:If you have no intention of voting it won’t help you get a better read though.
Otherwise it’s glorified posting of “look at me I am sorting”. If you’re not willing to vote someone then pressure is useless.
LOOOOOOLIn post 1378, Critter wrote:And I think your slot is scum doing good cop bad cop. I don’t see you as an experienced player being okay with what Notty is doing.In post 1375, Towelie wrote:that's not what we did; notty just thinks you're full of shit.In post 1373, Critter wrote:A scum reaction would be to ignore it or continue to push as if it doesn’t exist.
-b
I’m not even fucking doing it here, multiple people can vouch for thatIn post 1393, Gamma Emerald wrote:LOOOOOOLIn post 1378, Critter wrote:And I think your slot is scum doing good cop bad cop. I don’t see you as an experienced player being okay with what Notty is doing.In post 1375, Towelie wrote:that's not what we did; notty just thinks you're full of shit.In post 1373, Critter wrote:A scum reaction would be to ignore it or continue to push as if it doesn’t exist.
-b
notty’s hydra with fferyllt milks “good cop bad cop” for all it’s worth
That means NOTHING for notty here I think