Luckily that is not what I implied whatsoever. If you keep reading, I make the point in the very next paragraph that the statement I pointed out contributes to a pattern I noticed and was the basis for my scum read on him.In post 397, Cephrir wrote:Meta is all fine and good, but let's not do the thing where we pretend having a read on someone you dont know is impossible.In post 383, Bowser Jr. wrote:Looking at the bolded, can you explain why you've defaulted to "this is why scum!Spiffy would interact with me this way" instead of "since I haven't played with Spiffy before this is NAI overall"? If I haven't played with you before, it would stand to reason that as either alignment I am unfamiliar with you and could react this way as Town or Scum?
And yes, to be clear I am conflicted on my DV read and am fine to wait and see with him for now.
You’re welcome to take the self meta with a grain of salt, I get it. But it is accurate no matter how many times people want to grumble about it and I wouldn’t be surprised if scum try to use it against us to justify a safe and continued suspicion of our slot!