VOTE: MafMenIn post 49, MafMen wrote:igorsprite and pseudo interaction looks weird but i think its green for both sides
greeting seems probtown, i like their presence
In post 50, Thynhith wrote:VOTE: MafMenIn post 49, MafMen wrote:igorsprite and pseudo interaction looks weird but i think its green for both sides
greeting seems probtown, i like their presence
Maf's post is pinging me hard, he's townreading the two newbies for an NAI interaction. Bad case of TMI. And greeting has only one post of substance. This is scum trying to make filler content and fakereading
Get on this guy
i would love you to tell me why newbie scum goes "if i knew who mafia was i wouldnt tell youIn post 50, Thynhith wrote:VOTE: MafMenIn post 49, MafMen wrote:igorsprite and pseudo interaction looks weird but i think its green for both sides
greeting seems probtown, i like their presence
Maf's post is pinging me hard, he's townreading the two newbies for an NAI interaction. Bad case of TMI. And greeting has only one post of substance. This is scum trying to make filler content and fakereading
Get on this guy
" 
If I knew who scum was at this juncture, it would presumably be because I am one of them , meaning it would be a mistake to tell the town. To be clear, I don't know who scum is; I have a town role.In post 48, Greeting wrote:Why?In post 32, pseudoAristotle wrote:If I did I wouldn't say :p
ebwopIn post 56, MafMen wrote:sorry i didnt really treat what he said about greeting as the crux of his argument
i think its good to question aristotle there and the fact he didnt take any major stance on a weird post like that is nice
at the end of the day it all comes down to how you interpret my usage of 'probtown' and words like that, i personally didnt take it that strong of a term but i suppose i should switch up my vocab
Your quip was fine. I don't see how anyone could find it indicative, and certainly not in RVS.In post 54, pseudoAristotle wrote: This is a good learning experience, I now know that "haha i could hypothetically be mafia" is not a good goof to make as town.
You're hardly doing yourself a favour by throwing out wild reads. Why are you calling one one word post "presence"? The fact that you avoided engaging on your Greeting read speaks volumes more than if you had.In post 58, MafMen wrote:i am admittedly scrounging for stuff to post though because i want to move this game forward
this games pretty inactive compared to others
its not ‘wild reads’ as i do have town pings from them but im arguing semantics at that pointIn post 60, Thynhith wrote:You're hardly doing yourself a favour by throwing out wild reads. Why are you calling one one word post "presence"? The fact that you avoided engaging on your Greeting read speaks volumes more than if you had.In post 58, MafMen wrote:i am admittedly scrounging for stuff to post though because i want to move this game forward
this games pretty inactive compared to others
Who's giving ya the most scum pings right now? Or no one in particular?
OK, I think I'd call your first point here a little odd, Thynhith. There's definitelyIn post 50, Thynhith wrote:VOTE: MafMenIn post 49, MafMen wrote:igorsprite and pseudo interaction looks weird but i think its green for both sides
greeting seems probtown, i like their presence
Maf's post is pinging me hard, he's townreading the two newbies for an NAI interaction. Bad case of TMI. And greeting has only one post of substance. This is scum trying to make filler content and fakereading
Get on this guy
hmmmmm... noIn post 62, frogsfrogs wrote: Igor and Greeting, if you have anything more / anything to say about this MafMen vote I'd love to hear it!
You’re able to tell if someone is town by three posts, two of which relate to a very obvious RVS, and one was a one-worded question? Truly astounding.In post 49, MafMen wrote:igorsprite and pseudo interaction looks weird but i think its green for both sides
greeting seems probtown, i like their presence
I need to wait for the vote tally first to see if the vote in 55 is counted. I really want to vote him to put pressure, but it’s too early and too little to hammer on page 3 of Day One.In post 62, frogsfrogs wrote:OK, I think I'd call your first point here a little odd, Thynhith. There's definitelyIn post 50, Thynhith wrote:VOTE: MafMenIn post 49, MafMen wrote:igorsprite and pseudo interaction looks weird but i think its green for both sides
greeting seems probtown, i like their presence
Maf's post is pinging me hard, he's townreading the two newbies for an NAI interaction. Bad case of TMI. And greeting has only one post of substance. This is scum trying to make filler content and fakereading
Get on this guysomethingyou can get from the interaction, if not much and super super inconclusively. I think I'm seeing Pseudo's actions as more inexperienced, overenthusiastic townie than such hubristic first time scum. I'm feeling okay about them for now. Igor jumping on their joke so hard makes sense, but combined with how short, yet numerous his other posts have been too I'm quite ???? Mostly a typing style thing, still pings in my head as initially worrying.
Second point though: absolutely. Greeting had some joke posting to do about philosophers and then made a one word post questioning pseudo after igor had already done thesamething. If I had to make a premature read, myself, I'm almost inclined to say the opposite.
Igor and Greeting, if you have anything more / anything to say about this MafMen vote I'd love to hear it!
Glad that you got to the point yourself, and quite fast. Honestly, this is such a newbie thing to say that I don't think any scum would do as you did. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt for now. UNVOTE: pseudoAristotleIn post 54, pseudoAristotle wrote:If I knew who scum was at this juncture, it would presumably be because I am one of them , meaning it would be a mistake to tell the town. To be clear, I don't know who scum is; I have a town role.In post 48, Greeting wrote:Why?In post 32, pseudoAristotle wrote:If I did I wouldn't say :p
I guess the other reason I might know who they are is reads, but I don't have any at this point other than a very, VERY tentative sus of mafmen because other people are sussing him, and I'm not sure if that counts as *knowledge*.
This is a good learning experience, I now know that "haha i could hypothetically be mafia" is not a good goof to make as town.
Yeah, I had chosen this name at random and now I regret it tbf.implosion wrote:whoops. Greeting singular.
This is very reasonable! Yeah, I'm not feeling too hot on that explanation of his reads eitherIn post 66, Greeting wrote: I need to wait for the vote tally first to see if the vote in 55 is counted. I really want to vote him to put pressure, but it’s too early and too little to hammer on page 3 of Day One.
Artificial creation of content is never a townread to me.
@implosionIn post 56, MafMen wrote:sorry i didnt really treat what he said about greeting as the crux of his argument
i think its good to question aristotle there and the fact he didnt take any major stance on a weird post like that is nice
at the end of the day it all comes down to how you interpret my usage of 'probtown' and words like that, i personally didnt take it that strong of a strong term but i suppose i should switch up my vocab
theres an argument to be made about igor seeming a little opportunistic on his vote on me but i think his blatant refusal to explain further comes off as townieIn post 71, implosion wrote:Do you have any general thoughts on your wagon or specific thoughts on if you think any of the votes on you are particularly town or scum indicative?
you like igor that much off two emoticon posts?In post 69, implosion wrote:This page is actually useful. I think igor and Aristotle are town off of it, I can see townreading Thynhith for it but I don't get as strong of vibes on him as the other two.
@MafMen: you still haven't explained exactly why you thought Greeting was townish. Do you have an explanation for why his first 3 posts townpinged you?