@bork:
i actaully feel a little bit better abt u after ur convo with pooky tbh - i feel like if ur scum it's very easy to continue in the scumread on me and just blame my flip on lld after the fact, and the fact that you were listening to him and rethought ur stance based on the points he brought up is unlikely to come from scum there in this gamestate imo
~
@pooky:
i'm more than a little bit weirded out by the fact that the one and only thing you've actaully engaged with in like a week is trying to get bork to not vote me
where are u getting town-me from?
~
@lld:
In post 2025, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Where as Venus' reads don't fucking make any sense when i read them. They just don't.
The reason I didn't pick to kill you, Wisdom, is when I read your reads, your reads fucking make sense.
just pointing out that the reads you're objecting to are nearly identical to wisdom's >.>
In post 2032, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Like they scum read EMMI and SM and find MM's trolling weird and not town, and keep their vote on MM the entire day until they're pushed.
Is that a true or false statement, Wisdom? Answer me that, at least.
In post 2035, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Their reads don't make sense with their play. Their reads are on a subset of lurking players who they can hedge on because it's REAL EASY to take those stances on players who show very little. Their stated reasons for scum reading them boil down to each time "not enough engagement, bad engagement" but then they never follow up.
- my read on pooky/noraa was stronger than on the other 2 slots, so i voted there. not sure why this is a problem
- also, in most games, i can reasonably expect pooky/noraa to respond to a vote on them, which i can then use to refine my read (tbf that didn't happen here but that's different than most over games i've played with them). emmi/sm don't really seem like the sort of players that would respond to votes on them (and haven't ...). what are you expecting 'follow-through' to look like here even?
In post 2037, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:The only reason to push Pooky over any of those slots for THAT LONG is if you felt that Pooky/Noraa was scummier and needed more pressure but they have the LURKERS as scummier and wouldn't putting pressure on the lurker slots to create content or die in that scenario with their reads make more sense as a town perspecitve?
yes, exactly, i felt pooky/noraa was scummier and creatign pressure that i believed (and hoped) that the pressured slot would respond to. emmi has votes on her and has basically done nothing. SM's response to pressure has been scummy the way they're popping in
also if pooky/noraa is scum they're harder to deal with and they *need* to be pushed more - people are always going to circle back to emmi/SM, but pooky/noraa are more dangerous and can talk their way out of stuff more, and if they're scum it's important to get that sorted and handled earlier on. like scum-emmi/sm aren't really ~threatening~ to anything and don't need my immediate attention and focus. scum-mm does.
also i don't really know what else to here tbh. i'm not scum, you're complaining that my reads and trajectories don't make any sense when they're p much right there for anybody to follow, and my wagon basically exists because you demand it, and some of the people on it don't even think i'm scummy
~
In post 2049, Critter wrote:I think this meta here is almost a dead ringer for what she is posting here. I don’t see VFT scum at all.
eh that's like 4 year old meta, i'm not sure how much i look like that anymore, tbf
~
In post 1805, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:one of the very first meaningful VFT posts in the entire game.
That doesn't account for an extended spiral of increasingly weird, on-edge posts after LLD made her decision.
I haven't seen more than maybe one vaguely townish post from VFT since Page 55.
In post 2071, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:Initially, sure, because I trust her and she's town ANYWAY, I did follow her.
Since then I have seen a lot of weird ass fucking twists and turns from VFT
that have dropped them from "Eh sure let's call it town" to "basement bullshit scum", THATS WHY I'M HAPPY TO STAY THERE. It looks like scum that don't know how to get out of a hole they put themselves in.
hi i'd like to hear more about these please
In post 2078, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:If you want to scan while I’m handling all that, the things to look for are desperation statements (recognizing a sense of futility) combined with incoherently changing reads and unbalanced player list engagement (e.g. more time spent on less immediately available players). Contrast against pre-LLD-push posting.
and i object to this characterization, thank you
In post 2096, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:Wisdom, I was going to grab your posts (belatedly), but I realized it might all be for naught if I have to destroy every scrap of good will offered to me out of pure spite, so we will see how this pans out first.
i want these posts too
~
in other new thoughts:
critter is still obviosuly town
i feel worse on mush
a bit better abt ss
~
don't want to be voting towelie anymore
VOTE: emmi