i'll become more of an active player once i can latch onto a discussion that's happening in-thread and expand upon it
or if i feel like tunneling onto someone real hard
"all due respect, the words "Clemency" and "normal" do not belong in the same paragraph" - the worst
In post 2830, Deimos27 wrote:Mo thinks Galron uber scummy
I think they're maybe one or two hair's breadths +scum
What say you
ah i hear you
it is hard to say with someone who's been around almost as little as me
but it feels like he's been actually reading the thread and popping up just little enough to try and be forgotten
pedit: i could beat that post count :v
"all due respect, the words "Clemency" and "normal" do not belong in the same paragraph" - the worst
In post 2601, Deimos27 wrote:I'm gonna sleep on Ircher
Mo if you do your Galron explanation I'll read it tomorrow
ig i can just do a full scumcase but its literally basically just iso them --low content (asking questions but never following etc etc )
first -- they come in the conversation ignoring all the comotion and just posts filler content in 2044 by asking gamma what movie they watching
the main point is that
more specifically on that progression galron comes in saying they wont read 80 pages and will sheep the biggest wagon.
but then literally contradicts his own thought process by saying anyone else who came in late "would like to hear your thoughts". why would you literally just state that you were late and weren't gonna read but then expect other people to read lol.
then literally goes to a random ass person clemency and just says whats up because they are "low activity" when they themselves are same + worse
again asking questions never following up and votes ircher after sheeping titus i believe in 2137
then this post 2500 where u agreed with me. like its a stupid question -- i already answered this and its not even the fact that they asked that specific question its more like they just hop in to the convo and focus on me then leave lol
thats rlly it -- i just tried to make it more understandable vs what i wrote last time
Now that you have that context what would you say about this case
How much you agree, whether you get any vibes on Mo's alignment
yeah im starting to see your perspective but im okay on waiting with bated breath for a response
but at the same time we might get that response a little faster if we VOTE: galron
by my theory he's reading the thread after all
"all due respect, the words "Clemency" and "normal" do not belong in the same paragraph" - the worst
In post 2681, Datisi wrote:to answer your question, i am down for a wagon on gmo
2603 on particular is a post i really dislike, mainly the "wow look this person made a contradiction! only scum makes a contradiction like this one!" when the contradiction itself is like... lol? i don't think it's a genuine thought process to say that someone saying they'll sheep the biggest wagon then actually asking someone about what is happening in the game is scum!indicative
What about a perspective like this then?
Some people disagree with aspects of Mo's logic to the extent that they scumread him
ah you bastard i hate that you know how to actually get me to engage
i really dont see any fault with the logic in 2603
i especially agree with the part where randomly bringing me up is strange
i'd be down to go down that route but there are a lot of players in this game and i've so far only interacted with three or so, so we'll see how people sway me
"all due respect, the words "Clemency" and "normal" do not belong in the same paragraph" - the worst
Cool. I open up to a page about me. I guess that means I'm a wagon of some sort. I can't keep up with this pace, so if you're going to kill me go ahead. Just make it quick so I don't have to worry about a prod.
Speak of the devil indeed
By "I can't keep up with this pace" what do you mean exactly with regards to your willingness to play the game? You've still been trying to develop reads, right?
Mo might be expecting you to respond to their cases.
For me the emphasis was less on "response" and more on wanting to see you attempt substantively contributing
