You both have bad associatives with Galron, but DV's are more nuanced imo, which reads as more thought out, which I view as scummier.In post 2323, Wisdom wrote:Do explain why me and DV cant both be town
I feel strongly there's one and only one scum between the two of you.In post 2326, Wisdom wrote:I dont take issue with who you think is more likely
I take issue with the dichotomy
I don't really, as I said at the start of the day, but it would be remiss if I didn't point out you were one of his strongest defenders yesterday. Even though I do think you were defending in good faith.In post 2328, Wisdom wrote:The quotes because I cant imagine you believe with a straight face that i have associatives with galron
Okay.In post 2300, DeasVail wrote:I wanted to provocative and see how Wisdom would respond, but I completely disagree with this post from Wisdom and I think it's a misrepresentation. The core argument I'm making is that the confidence in Galron-town was such a weird take that I don't think even headstrong-Wisdom would conceivably have that confidence in Galron-town, and to me it makes more sense as being Wisdom-scum emulating his town meta.In post 2228, Wisdom wrote:Youre contradicting yourselfIn post 2222, DeasVail wrote:but as someone who is known (at least in my experience with him) to be very headstrong about reads even when they're wrong, to go ridiculously all in on Galron being town feels like a good strategy for Wisdom-scum. I don't think he's town because I don't think town in their right mind could have been so confident in Galron being town.
"Wisdom is known to be headstrong even if he's wrong"
"I can't see how Wisdom can be so confident"
Wait, why didn't you like your own post?In post 2334, Pavowski wrote:I didn't like it either tbh. Will return to this when I'm less irritated.
Got frustrated, got snippy. Not a fan of my tone.In post 2338, Icebox wrote:Wait, why didn't you like your own post?In post 2334, Pavowski wrote:I didn't like it either tbh. Will return to this when I'm less irritated.
-Bell
The summary of GL’s post is that he provided me a list of strong townreads who he has also discussed with Titus. He thinks Wisdom is town for having a similar view of the game to him. Has slight concern about OTH but thinks probably town. Thinks Pav is scum. Probably thinks I’m town but I’m sure that he’s not as certain of that as he is of his strong townreads.
I think this is the most concerning post. The original one was fine I think, but this has an appeasement vibe to it.In post 2324, Pavowski wrote:Like I seriously am getting the impression you're taking everything I post in the worst possible light. I literally said I do not think you're the scummier of the two, and DV is far from a sure thing at this point.In post 2321, Wisdom wrote:That sounded like lining up a push on me after dv
Wow.In post 2343, Pavowski wrote:Okay, you guys are ready to run me up. Cool cool cool.
Might as well claim.
I'm Oberon's Flower. I make people fall in love. 'Twas I who loverized Galron and Icebox. I had a good scumread on Galron and I was nullish at best on Icebox after d1 (townier since then!). Several of you expressed that loverizing seemed like a scum ability; maybe it usually is (this is my first game with the mechanic), but this time it isn't. I had an ability and didn't want to die with it in my pocket. I do not know why they subsequently fell out of love, but something must have happened to nullify it because my ability was still "spent".
I can loverize again if the opportunity arises for me to repurchase the ability, but it hasn't come up yet, so I'm a vanilla townie right now. As such I do make sense as an elimination target, as until something unforeseen happens, I can't add any intel or affect the game in any meaningful way. I can think of one pair I'm curious to loverize if given the chance, but who knows if that'll happen or if you will let me live that long.
Anyway, watch the vote counts. There is opportunism afoot.
And I wrote you guys a damn sonnet, too.
Probably done posting for tonight!