I've finished reading through D1 through the lens of the new stuff I know today that I didn't know yesterday; to wit:
- -Greeting was town
-Despite the fact it was a reasonable assumption made both myself and catboi, and possibly others, made Pseudo/SM is not the JK; Implosion is.
-Frogs or MafMen is the Mafia Roleblocker (I do also understand that from the perspective of others, I am also a possible candidate for the Roleblocker)
...and having done so, I think MafMen looks like the clear favourite here.
Firstly, frogsfrogs.
None of the new information makes frogsfrogs look worse to my eyes, at least as far as D1 goes. In fact, I think the confirmation that Greeting was town makes him look even better:
In post 215, frogsfrogs wrote:I really thought Greeting and Val were both town arguing from different experience but this has absolutely spiraled now. :S
In post 218, frogsfrogs wrote:Honestly I consider the derail to be doing more arguing about Greeting vs Val right now. I don't think Greeting proposing to self hammer makes him look more scummy and I don't think it says anything about Val.
The context for the second quote there was Thyn coming in in between and saying "Focusing on me atp would be derailing town. I would advise everyone to look at Val/Greeting more carefully." I don't think scum, of either variety, would avail themselves of an oppotunity there to pull attention away from 'Greeting vs Val' when they know that was going to result in a mislim. Much better to follow Thyn's advice and keep attention on our little scrap, divide the town and get a wagon going on one or the other of us, and I think that would be a play that would be obvious to any scum no matter how new they were. Of course, that
IS
exactly what MafMen does - attacks me for what eventually transpires is a difference in prefered terminiology, and then; after the self-hammer threat, pivoting to throwing shade on Greeting. On a re-read, it looks very much like he is trying to play both sides of the argument there, while frogs was fairly quick to call us TvT, and move way from what could have been an easy mislim, particulary with the self-hammer threat, and one that most likley would have made me look very bad going into D2 - a move that I think was obviously anti-scum now, in retrospect.
On the other hand, MafMen does not come off so well. I start with post
100.
In post 100, MafMen wrote:i think my wagon was pretty pure so im personally dealing with a poe of margot, implosion, and frogsfrogs
theres for sure atleast one wolf in that comp if not two, but im not 100% confident in saying my wagon was all green
This looks rather backwards, to me. I can't understand how you get a feeling that there are X number of scum on your wagon, and it looks like MafMen is trying to say he thinks there was at most one, and THEN arrive at a PoE from that. Perhaps this is a playstyle thing, but how does one get a sense that a wagon, any wagon, is 'pretty pure', and then come up with a PoE from that, without evaluating the slots on it first?
I also note something else of interest:
In post 312, MafMen wrote:also why is he more likely to be scum?
while irrational his thought process is genuine
This is a follow up to mafman saying he initial placed his vote on me because he thought I was misrepresenting Greeting, but he realised that he agreed with me that what they were doing is harmful. I say this is part of that 'playing both sides', because he is still trying to push at me here, but note what he says about Greetings thought process: it
is
genuine. Not it 'looks' genuine, it is. Clearly, that proved to be true, but the only way MafMen could have known that then was if he already knew Greeting was town. Was this a subtle scumslip that went unnoticed in the heat of the argument?
I need to look through D2 as well before I make up my mind (and I really am dreading rereading that shitshow - I think stopping to make this post might well just be an excuse to delay doing so) given I've learnt my lesson as far as unchallenged assumptons go, but I am certainly leaning towards MafMen currently.