Alright. I don't think it's worth hiding at this point, scum no-killing was the mechanically correct play here (incidentally, it'd also be their correct play if we'd limmed the roleblocker) no matter who scum is. It's the only way to avoid a mechanically guaranteed loss.
The situation is now this: me, catboi and StrangeMatter are all mechanically cleared, which is great. If anyone wants me to run through the argument again to verify it I'm happy to. We now have to determine if the other scum is frogs, Val or igor, and we have two shots, which is pretty solid odds. I think it's going to take some extreme arguments for me to not want to use our first shot on frogs. Val's play just makes absolutely no sense to me whatsoever from scum. This
is
the point at which we do need to start seriously looking at igor, simply because of how many people are clear, but there are quite a few things in igor's play that I also would find kind of shocking to have come from scum. Chiefly among these are his desire to claim early as a tracker where, from his point of view, he'd have a 2/3 shot of being CC-able (if igor is scum then we're in column C, meaning he'd know that tracker will be countered by a cop eventually in C1 and a mason eventually in C3, with C2 as the only setup where the claim works). I also think his elaborate series of claim changes on d2 is absolutely absurd play for scum, the kind of thing that is something along the lines of incredibly high risk for medium-low reward.
igor should claim his result first, technically (and no claiming one thing and then changing to something else at this point, please!)