Detective D'Arby's Delicious Deduction
This will be a real quick one, but in
1565, we see the collection of the basis of F/G's argument that spiraled into my actual read. However, Gamma's response in
1567 is dismissive.
In post 1567, Gamma Emerald wrote:Well up until now my basis in this game has felt very weak so I didn’t feel like trying to press based on that was very honest.
He then goes forward in
1568 and
1569 to ignore the argument presented entirely to discredit F/G. Regardless of how you read the situation, an argument was made with meta that was presented and yet it was not acknowledged or refuted. That reads as a bad-faith argument. I actually disagree that F/G was being too rough with Gamma as
1575 is a legit question. Especially when Gamma uses intimidating words such as "crock of shit" in
1577. This alone does not make me sr Gamma. Looking at his VP vote, it would otherwise come across as being a typical emotional player, which is consistent in her gameplay so far.
1608 F/G breaks down the differences between game energy between Gamma now and then. Gamma than responds with
1639 saying the reason she's been cold to F/G was Pooky had Gamma as the d1 miselim in hidden temple. Which, in it's own right puts context to the situation, but at the same time, the odds that a) this is the same alignment set up and b) the exact same play is really small. I'd think Gamma as an expirence player would know that. It also stikes me odd that Gamma is making this argument
now
after baiting posts like
1599 and
1635. Why would Gamma bread crumb this revelation AFTER scumreading them in
1595? Realistically, only Pooky would potentially get what Gamma is referring to. I bring this up because I feel that this was an attempt at an intimidation tactic.
1654 claims that this was because Gamma didn't know how F/G would treat him, yet the actual argument that happened instead didn't do anything to help Gamma, and I don't see how putting relevant information as to why you are being uncooperative is helpful to the town.
And what really gets me is that Gamma is holding onto this while asking
Pooky responds with
1694 pointing out that if Gamma has the research skills to remeber the plan that Pooky made, why do they not have that same energy in understanding why it didn't apparently happen.
1701 Gamma then ignores all of that and says F/G is trying to make her sound crazy. I'd imagine a good faith town would at least acknowledge 1694. Pooky then doubles down with the next logical conclusion of
1708 showing how Gamma has no evidence.
Like,
1717 is so wild to read. I don't like it when people use harsh words with me either, but I don't think F/G did? This was an incredibly emotional argument on Gamma's side where he scumread someone who made valid points that he couldn't counter. Gamma's reactions to the meta being presented doesn't seem pro-town and I don't trust it.