Yeah, doc killed/saved but actually killed enchant who claimed doc trying to draw a scum killIn post 974, Looker wrote:O wow, this is going to be interesting. The shock was the Doc?
And then got got himself
Kinda funny actually
Yeah, doc killed/saved but actually killed enchant who claimed doc trying to draw a scum killIn post 974, Looker wrote:O wow, this is going to be interesting. The shock was the Doc?
\-_-/In post 973, mc esther wrote:it doesnt really matter because you cant talk me out of it, but it's the d2 post-hammer interaction where i quoted your townread on lickety.In post 963, T3 wrote:esther, can you please report your case on me because i genuinely can't find it when skimming through your iso
In post 954, Roden wrote:Let's imagine we elim an Ice Mafia today. That makes it 1-1-4. Scum wins if they each kill one townie, since they can have a dual victory if they eliminate/endgame town. They would have to coordinate the kill to achieve this though.
So, what's preventing Fire and Ice teams from coordinating the kill once they secure an elim that isn't the Fire team? With no CPR Doc, Mafia can freely coordinate during twilight and there's nothing we can do about it.
What’s your argument against this slot?In post 978, Auro wrote:I agree on Looker looking like the most likely LQ partner.
If Looker claims to be Ice Mafia I'd reconsider voting them.
In post 970, T3 wrote:.-.In post 968, Roden wrote:In what universe do you think "yeah I could have bussed but is it likely" is a townie thing to say? You're practically daring us to scum read you. Why would your only defense be that it isn't likely that you bussed? Especially when you aren't even giving actual reasons for why you wouldn't have bussed there.In post 967, T3 wrote:how is that post scummy?
It's not really my scum playstyle to bus in a situation where I don't have to for gamestate/read reasons (mbos 13).
In post 971, T3 wrote:I worded that badly.
Scum me probably soft defends LQ until he's flipped. Scum me usually busses only when forced to because I'm widely townread and need to keep the image up. (Mbos 13, Hanahaki, WNT)
Ok, I can believe this. I still think you could be Ice Mafia but you're likely not Fire Mafia.In post 972, T3 wrote:MBOS 13 I was sitting around lean town in nearly everyone's readlist. I had two widely scumread deadweight partners who I kept shielding until I had to bus both of them in ELO or I would go down after them.
Hanhaki, both of my partners scumclaimed for idiotic reasons Day 2 and Day 3, I was widely townread. I deathbussed both of them and endgamed.
WNT I was widely townread. I hard bussed my deadweight partner Day 2 or else it would look slightly suspicious for me.
Those are the 3 examples I can think of off the top of my head.
In post 974, Looker wrote:O wow, this is going to be interesting. The shock was the Doc?
Esther quoted the post that explains the situation.In post 979, Looker wrote:How does town win as of this post? Do we need to aim for one mafia over the other?
I'm not sure. I'll read LQ's iso ~soon.In post 982, Roden wrote:In post 970, T3 wrote:.-.In post 968, Roden wrote:In what universe do you think "yeah I could have bussed but is it likely" is a townie thing to say? You're practically daring us to scum read you. Why would your only defense be that it isn't likely that you bussed? Especially when you aren't even giving actual reasons for why you wouldn't have bussed there.In post 967, T3 wrote:how is that post scummy?
It's not really my scum playstyle to bus in a situation where I don't have to for gamestate/read reasons (mbos 13).In post 971, T3 wrote:I worded that badly.
Scum me probably soft defends LQ until he's flipped. Scum me usually busses only when forced to because I'm widely townread and need to keep the image up. (Mbos 13, Hanahaki, WNT)Ok, I can believe this. I still think you could be Ice Mafia but you're likely not Fire Mafia.In post 972, T3 wrote:MBOS 13 I was sitting around lean town in nearly everyone's readlist. I had two widely scumread deadweight partners who I kept shielding until I had to bus both of them in ELO or I would go down after them.
Hanhaki, both of my partners scumclaimed for idiotic reasons Day 2 and Day 3, I was widely townread. I deathbussed both of them and endgamed.
WNT I was widely townread. I hard bussed my deadweight partner Day 2 or else it would look slightly suspicious for me.
Those are the 3 examples I can think of off the top of my head.
Who do you think is LQ's partner? Consensus seems to be Bingle/Looker but the sudden drop in game activity is concerning.
antipartner pointsIn post 113, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 24, Pavowski wrote:A50 how does it feel to be unvotable today? What a treat it must beIn post 26, Pavowski wrote:You can get hecked for stealing the first pagetopIn post 39, Pavowski wrote:Obvious scumclaim is obviousIn post 38, T3 wrote:When I type in A50, my phone suggests that I type “A50 and then my autocorrect doesn’t have a problem with your attitude and barb is going to be a good person and barb and I’m not sure if I can have a problem with your phone”In post 68, Pavowski wrote:Are you guys like... Seriously arguing about A50's alignment?
You're not, right?Pav really is lacking spice in his posts. Played with them in a newbie a bit ago and their posts there were quite a bit better than here. These posts seem dry and unimaginitive. I also couldn't help but see a buddy attempt of the IC.In post 70, Pavowski wrote:The only sarcasm I understand is my own
VOTE: Pav
Bingle chainsaw'd me when I voted for LQ, and never shifted his vote afterwards.In post 981, DArby wrote:What’s your argument against this slot?In post 978, Auro wrote:I agree on Looker looking like the most likely LQ partner.
If Looker claims to be Ice Mafia I'd reconsider voting them.
I don't understand. What's keeping the fire Mafia from claiming ice MafiaIn post 980, mc esther wrote:In post 954, Roden wrote:Let's imagine we elim an Ice Mafia today. That makes it 1-1-4. Scum wins if they each kill one townie, since they can have a dual victory if they eliminate/endgame town. They would have to coordinate the kill to achieve this though.
So, what's preventing Fire and Ice teams from coordinating the kill once they secure an elim that isn't the Fire team? With no CPR Doc, Mafia can freely coordinate during twilight and there's nothing we can do about it.
In post 983, Roden wrote:What's your stance on everything right now? General consensus so far is that your slot is most likely the last Fire Mafia. If it isn't you, who do you think it is?
How do people keep forgetting roden is confirmed town?In post 992, mc esther wrote:roden's just a hunch.
I wanna vote this slot.In post 371, Bingle wrote:Oh the salsa post is also very scummy.
Regardless of whether roden/LQ is t/s t/t s/s or m/w,there’s definitely scum in the cheerleaders. Other potential takers on that pool are T3 and pav from what I’ve seen so far.
LQ is being surprisingly readable/reasonable given the amount of complaining I saw while p dodging. Light townread there. Roden is meh. Not really scummy, but reacted poorly to baiting. Not really towny either, just kinda got pushed into this whole interaction.
Darby is pro town. Mc is either town or trying to pocket Darby. Need to poke there a bit later to see what falls out of the tree.
In post 678, LicketyQuickety wrote:Can confirm.In post 672, Bingle wrote:I don't think LQ having weird takes is particularly scummy.
In post 683, LicketyQuickety wrote:Town:
Roden
mc esther - Townie sounding points.
Guilty Lion - Not seeing GL as Scum here. Their push on Roden looks bad in retrospect, but I'm guilty of the same thing.
Town Lean:
Bingle - Good thoughts, feel like he's actually trying to sort me.
DArby - Probably Town, but there was something that was bugging me about them near EoD. Would have to look and try and figure it out. Town Lean.
Null:
Enchant - IDK, higher activity? That's probably NAI
Pavowski - Null. Why are People TRing Pav? Is it based on pre-flip or what?
Auro - Having doubts here since I'm probably TRing Bingle and GL more at this point.
T3 - Don't really feel anything here.
Scum Lean:
Galron - I guess I have to have a Scum Lean somewhere. And I didn't really like that the were stiff at the SoD 1. Someone else made that comment and I went back to look and I can definitely see it. Their reaction to it was bad too.
VOTE: Galron
look at this dudeIn post 779, LicketyQuickety wrote:LOL, even Bingle can derp.In post 778, Bingle wrote:You not already being on the T3 wagon is a disappointment, tbh.
I was wondering specifically whether you would hop right back on Galron if someone else joined or if you'd stay with the wagon with more steam.
Prolly Darby? Think I'll do a full game re-read soon since a lot of slots this game are just merging together in my head.In post 992, mc esther wrote:pavowski, darby, and roden; yes, same old same old. pavowski's posting got kinda weird today imo, but i dont really see how it's alignment-indicative, i think he's just glad that nobody's hounding him for talking about night kills any more (sorry ik im a bit of a bitch about that stuff). darby's frustratingly inactive, but again, i dont think it's alignment indicative, and i dont feel the need to reconsider a read which literally(?) everyone agrees on, i really do believe in the power of consensus. roden's just a hunch.
you might notice that this has implications on your alignment. which read do you disagree with?