eye is critical, without looking at meta, it seems to be an aggressive solving style. Yeah, solving, I don't think she is scum unless someone within
{Cabd/2 other people I thought of last night but forgot}
Andante
feels like limbait but I did not like 629 because it did not address
LLD's
questions that I also wanted answers to.
Not that I'm worried about solving her alignment I'm pretty confident
Fire
lol leaves most of this plist.
Wait is it even sound to call anyone limbait in this setup? Mmm.
Me sad I've probably townread scum already yzvaoausuajskfiej
I don't think LLD has left her scumrange at all.
I simultaneously don't believe it's very worth sorting her for certain entirely on her own play unless you know how she plays pretty well in general, which I'm not sure is a thing in this playerlist.
I'm personally planning on sorting her indirectly rather than directly regardless
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
In post 631, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Even if you are going to abandon your reads, which is completrlt fair a s I have done it before myself,
Your mindset in having developed those reads is critical for me.
So humor me, won't you? Play along, lemme get into those brain meats and get a better sense of you.
You're trying to lock me into the reads I don't wanna stand by, seriously, this is of 0 benefit to anyone, ughhh
"you joined the wrong game if you didn't want interrogation"
> excuse me? Large theme games. I join for fun, literally take cats vs dogs for example, I was miller, had no clue, basically kept claiming maf all game, and that's all I did. Everyone here is crazy serious, so obviously I'm being more serious here. I'm not doing interrogation stuff though, you can interact with me sure, but at the rate this is going, you're just gonna drag down my mood and make me not want to be here, which I'd rather not have happen. thanks
I'm explicitly not trying to lock you in to anything. You're allowed to change your mind on reads.
But when you state reads, I'm interested in why, even if you think they're wrong. I'm asking questions about that.
Oh, and, I'm sorry but saying things like "you're going to drag down my mood and make me not want to be here" when asked a few simple questions is not going to disuade me. That's weaponizing your emotions to evade a train of questioning, I'm simply not going to let you have that.
You can, of course, refuse to answer, but if you are town, and looking to be townread (which should be your goal) I encourage you to answer when you get a chance. It might shed some insight onto your play.
Because right now you're only showing me defensive and other scummy signs and that's very possible to come from town who just doesn't wanna answer the questions but I'm not gonna be able to townread you off that, assumign you are town.
And another effort to misrep me, I'm not trying to bring emotions into this!! I just wanna keep the good vibes, I seriously don't see the problem with that. How about this, I refuse to answer any and all questions from you (unless I feel like it's a reasonable one/question about my reads)
Also telling me to act more towny? whatever. I literally don't care if I'm townread or not, I'll find scum and that's that, not like I care what people think about me
I will leave whether my words are a misrepresentation of yours to others to decide, but I'll say that saying "making me not want to be here (in this game)" is an emotional attack asking me to stop or you'll lose interest. I don't consider that a misrepresentation, and if you do I encourage you to explain what you actually meant, if I am misunderstanding you.
Like if you feel I am misrepresenting you, don't just use the buzzword, explain where I'm wrong and I'll accept what your intent actually was.
Also, I like that you don't care if you're townread. I've been there before as town, still... you're not in a great spot to be not answering questions.
So I'll tell you what: If you don't wanna answer questions about your earlier reads, at least do me a solid and come back next time you come back with some good reads and questions on other players.
Yes my Lord, but questions are dangerous, for they have answers.
11 heads and counting now, plurality is adaptive. If our experience might help you, click here.
If you wish to speak to one of us, we are Niamh, Rhiannon, Rhea, Aisling, Saoirse, Selene, Aoife, Fírinne, Aurélie, Lyra and Airna.
Soar on wings of retribution and set the world ablaze
In post 577, Datisi wrote:i think it's been talked about already, but i dislike 477, specifically the malakittens read. like, at the time of posting that, it had been 8 hours since the game started. that feels WAY too early to slap a "they're not posting therefore scum" sticker on someone, especially considering mala was complaining about the amount of posts, which to me seems like a possible indicator of "i'm too busy right now". the rest of the post is kind of meh, i'm curious why those exact people have been chosen for a readslist i guess.
and 481 is equally bad... like, marci was doing that readslist to help lily apparently. but, if i'm struggling to get into the game and someone does a post like that to help me, my first thought is to actually interact with that post and try to form my own reads and whatnot, and lily just blandly agrees, and she specifically agrees with the one read i find the worst on the list
i feel heartbroken taly doesn't see the towniness in me
not really digging galron, but i guess he gets some points for being the first person to call out lily in 514
554 - hm. agree with not liking RH9's response, not sure i see how guiltylion's post there is strictly bad. so would like an elaboration when you can, @lld. also, do you currently have any preference on who you pair with?
okay, i made it to where i first started posting. i have... probably too many people i find suspicious and too many people i flat out don't have a read on. guiltylion and lld are probably the only two ladies from whom i felt something resembling townpings.
Thank you for using post links but can you say who made the post when you're doing this? Generally no idea who you're talking about unless we click on the post link first.
Your follow up question wasn't... sufficient to explain your reaction, and I'd like to know more.
629 struck me as a very Bad Post. i didn't want to comment more on it though, since you were in the middle of interrogating her and i think there's value in being able to read that discussion uninterrupted. but i wanted to express my dislike anyway, and see if anything comes from it. so here we are.
I follow you. Good enough, thanks.
Yes my Lord, but questions are dangerous, for they have answers.
11 heads and counting now, plurality is adaptive. If our experience might help you, click here.
If you wish to speak to one of us, we are Niamh, Rhiannon, Rhea, Aisling, Saoirse, Selene, Aoife, Fírinne, Aurélie, Lyra and Airna.
Soar on wings of retribution and set the world ablaze
In post 577, Datisi wrote:@lld. also, do you currently have any preference on who you pair with?
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
In post 577, Datisi wrote:@lld. also, do you currently have any preference on who you pair with?
I want to pair with someone that I read as town and force an interesting choice about who gets shot, but I'm also interested in shoving more obvious townies together because I'm never going to reach 100% townread status just based off who I am.
So... someone who will be able to work with me for a while, not afraid of death and understands we're going to have a hard time if the game requires us to live to the end instead of just dying given that situation.
Yes my Lord, but questions are dangerous, for they have answers.
11 heads and counting now, plurality is adaptive. If our experience might help you, click here.
If you wish to speak to one of us, we are Niamh, Rhiannon, Rhea, Aisling, Saoirse, Selene, Aoife, Fírinne, Aurélie, Lyra and Airna.
Soar on wings of retribution and set the world ablaze
In post 617, Ydrasse wrote:@datisi i didn’t actually notice that he never followed up on that question (galron) which makes it a bit shadier
i’m a sucker for the questions like that though >_> also him calling dragons whimsical later as a kind of read. (i don’t really like galron reads)
The endgame thing? His not responding was a mark in my book. Not going to force an answer.
oh my god.
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
In post 654, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:So I'll tell you what: If you don't wanna answer questions about your earlier reads, at least do me a solid and come back next time you come back with some good reads and questions on other players.
i'm just annoyed that you said how me not responding was ~a mark in your book~ when in fact it was you who was not responding for a while now.
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
In post 669, Prism wrote:Very indifferent to recent events, and very low motivation.
RH9's posting lately is closer to his town posting but is just a complete enigma to try and read for alignment.
Thoughts on GL?
Yes my Lord, but questions are dangerous, for they have answers.
11 heads and counting now, plurality is adaptive. If our experience might help you, click here.
If you wish to speak to one of us, we are Niamh, Rhiannon, Rhea, Aisling, Saoirse, Selene, Aoife, Fírinne, Aurélie, Lyra and Airna.
Soar on wings of retribution and set the world ablaze
In post 670, Datisi wrote:i'm just annoyed that you said how me not responding was ~a mark in your book~ when in fact it was you who was not responding for a while now.
In post 670, Datisi wrote:i'm just annoyed that you said how me not responding was ~a mark in your book~ when in fact it was you who was not responding for a while now.
Yeah. I just missed the response is all.
And "for awhile now" would have been overnight while I was asleep.
In post 670, Datisi wrote:i'm just annoyed that you said how me not responding was ~a mark in your book~ when in fact it was you who was not responding for a while now.
Yeah. I just missed the response is all.
And "for awhile now" would have been overnight while I was asleep.
