this seems p townie to me lol
also theyre just vibing
And they called me town so
this seems p townie to me lol
ok why was it scum indicative originally then to you?In post 269, Andante wrote:ehhh I'm not sure I'd say only town would do it, idk innocentvillager at all, but they're striking me at the kind of person who genuinely wants to know about a massclaim here, and would ask it as town/scum like, anytime I ask setup questions/how to play, I'd ask those exact same questions as either alignment. Could also just be partly that I don't TR innocentvillager yet, and they have so many posts so ehhh idkIn post 263, catboi wrote:Doesn't "help" but the mindset is almost always town driven because scum are never going to be so bold as to suggest the idea if they believe it to be a pro-scum move, as doing so just draws negative attention to them and is unlikely to get cooperation. Way more likely to get floated by town who are trying to experiment - don't think I've ever seen scum propose it, actually. (day 1 mass is more viable in a cosed setup, in here it's pointless and bad)In post 252, Andante wrote:I SRed this btw, I do not see how asking for a mass claim helps anything. If I claim infinite vig here, I could be town or scum, I won't be CCed, it literally does nothing to help us, PRs won't be CCedIn post 246, catboi wrote:Terrible idea but probably town for entertaining it at all, scum don't usually propose mass claim and risk the blowbackIn post 138, innocentvillager wrote:ok don’t actually do it please
But
How bad is massclaim in this setup
I kind of entertained the idea briefly but I have no idea how to do mech
Look at the motivations, not whether the suggestion is helpful/unhelpful
scum don’t like to contradict themselvesIn post 276, Mare wrote:How is it townie.
That's enough for you to TR? flow hasn't actually done anything other than random vote/joke around... I'm not saying they're scum, but like, I'm not comfortable calling them town yetIn post 275, innocentvillager wrote:this seems p townie to me lol
also theyre just vibing
And they called me town so
have you not seen flow sit here and just vote half the table?In post 279, innocentvillager wrote:scum don’t like to contradict themselvesIn post 276, Mare wrote:How is it townie.
fake OBVTOWNIn post 206, Faker wrote:Mare, I have spoken in several different games of my intentionality in interacting with you to either shut you out of the game or to stay out of your way. It should be obvious that I intend to do neither this game.
However, in previous iterations (ex. Slaughter Hour) your response has been to be (rightfully) extremely skeptical of my intentions and to steer clear as much as possible. Your only real post about me that game came to warn off someone townreading me for tilt, and you only quoted someone else rather than added any commentary of your own.
I don't see the same skepticism of my intent here. I am very happy voting you.
WhatIn post 275, innocentvillager wrote:this seems p townie to me lol
also theyre just vibing
And they called me town so
Flow hasnt done anything other than act like town flowIn post 280, Andante wrote:flow hasn't actually done anything other than random vote/joke around...
This is starting to feel like a push from scum, because I only voted 2 people?In post 281, Andante wrote:have you not seen flow sit here and just vote half the table?In post 279, innocentvillager wrote:scum don’t like to contradict themselvesIn post 276, Mare wrote:How is it townie.
do u thjnk scum!andante is purposely lying here? is that why u feel it’s a scum push?In post 286, flow trap wrote:This is starting to feel like a push from scum, because I only voted 2 people?In post 281, Andante wrote:have you not seen flow sit here and just vote half the table?In post 279, innocentvillager wrote:scum don’t like to contradict themselvesIn post 276, Mare wrote:How is it townie.
Cause the way you asked, it wasn't like you genuinely saw the benefit in claiming. I'm pretty dang clueless about a lot of this setup, but it's clear maf isn't gonna CC stuff, one quick glance at the setup page says that... I feel like if you were genuinely curions about a massclaim you'd have been likeIn post 277, innocentvillager wrote:ok why was it scum indicative originally then to you?In post 269, Andante wrote:ehhh I'm not sure I'd say only town would do it, idk innocentvillager at all, but they're striking me at the kind of person who genuinely wants to know about a massclaim here, and would ask it as town/scum like, anytime I ask setup questions/how to play, I'd ask those exact same questions as either alignment. Could also just be partly that I don't TR innocentvillager yet, and they have so many posts so ehhh idkIn post 263, catboi wrote:Doesn't "help" but the mindset is almost always town driven because scum are never going to be so bold as to suggest the idea if they believe it to be a pro-scum move, as doing so just draws negative attention to them and is unlikely to get cooperation. Way more likely to get floated by town who are trying to experiment - don't think I've ever seen scum propose it, actually. (day 1 mass is more viable in a cosed setup, in here it's pointless and bad)In post 252, Andante wrote:I SRed this btw, I do not see how asking for a mass claim helps anything. If I claim infinite vig here, I could be town or scum, I won't be CCed, it literally does nothing to help us, PRs won't be CCedIn post 246, catboi wrote:Terrible idea but probably town for entertaining it at all, scum don't usually propose mass claim and risk the blowbackIn post 138, innocentvillager wrote:ok don’t actually do it please
But
How bad is massclaim in this setup
I kind of entertained the idea briefly but I have no idea how to do mech
Look at the motivations, not whether the suggestion is helpful/unhelpful
Yeah, I know I am an easy vote for scum and Anda has bent the truth twice nowIn post 288, innocentvillager wrote:do u thjnk scum!andante is purposely lying here? is that why u feel it’s a scum push?In post 286, flow trap wrote:This is starting to feel like a push from scum, because I only voted 2 people?In post 281, Andante wrote:have you not seen flow sit here and just vote half the table?In post 279, innocentvillager wrote:scum don’t like to contradict themselvesIn post 276, Mare wrote:How is it townie.
no no!!! I don't sr you yet, but going "scum don't like to contradict themselves" uhhh has innocent not been watching you just vote and move on?In post 286, flow trap wrote:This is starting to feel like a push from scum, because I only voted 2 people?In post 281, Andante wrote:have you not seen flow sit here and just vote half the table?In post 279, innocentvillager wrote:scum don’t like to contradict themselvesIn post 276, Mare wrote:How is it townie.
This is a very weird tone shift after I pushed backIn post 291, Andante wrote:no no!!! I don't sr you yet, but going "scum don't like to contradict themselves" uhhh has innocent not been watching you just vote and move on?In post 286, flow trap wrote:This is starting to feel like a push from scum, because I only voted 2 people?In post 281, Andante wrote:have you not seen flow sit here and just vote half the table?In post 279, innocentvillager wrote:scum don’t like to contradict themselvesIn post 276, Mare wrote:How is it townie.
You said I havent contributed at all and voted a lot of peopleIn post 292, Andante wrote:I AM NOT BENDING THE TRUTH FLOW
I somehow didn't grok the point you were actually making regarding the draft the first time but I picked high as a hedge and wanted somewhere in the middle - as scum I'd have gone aggressively for a low number because I'd have teammates who could mitigate the damage if I'd ended up doubling up with someoneIn post 221, skitter30 wrote:thus far i like andante and dats
and maybe faker iv and mare
pings on midwaybear
and i'm still somewhat suspicious of catboi's 21 but he obviously isn't super into the game yet so idk we'll see. the sleepless vote was a good point tho
feels a lot like you trying to pivot your voters on to me....In post 294, flow trap wrote:This is a very weird tone shift after I pushed backIn post 291, Andante wrote:no no!!! I don't sr you yet, but going "scum don't like to contradict themselves" uhhh has innocent not been watching you just vote and move on?In post 286, flow trap wrote:This is starting to feel like a push from scum, because I only voted 2 people?In post 281, Andante wrote:have you not seen flow sit here and just vote half the table?In post 279, innocentvillager wrote:scum don’t like to contradict themselvesIn post 276, Mare wrote:How is it townie.