Can't remember if I've ever done it as scum honestly.In post 1747, Datisi wrote:is this something you do as scum?
I think pretty much anything I do as town I
Can't remember if I've ever done it as scum honestly.In post 1747, Datisi wrote:is this something you do as scum?
Ok fair enuf, i do see the difference. Fwiw i wasnt really calling you scum for it, more just making an observation. Also 'posting but not really providing a lot of reads' is my definition of active lurkingIn post 1746, Something_Smart wrote:I hate the term "active lurking". I was posting but not providing a lot of reads. I'm not even sure that's a scumtell for me, in general, but in that situation it probably was.In post 1744, skitter30 wrote:also you were active lurking for like a week in that game ?
Meanwhile here I'm not posting at all, over a holiday weekend. That, at least to me, seems totally different.
I'd be very happy to wagon himIn post 1749, Andante wrote:I know it's not directed at me but,In post 1748, skitter30 wrote:Do u want to read sleepless's wall + his iso and tell me what you think?
I think sleepless's wall is a repeat of a lot of what I said,which is why I don't like it, sure it could've been genuine thoughts, but a lot of it was like exact things I was saying so ehhh anyone going "I'll read later" then when they do read, there's nothing original, and it's all repeating stuff already said, makes you really question if it came from town
feels like a d2 thing to talk about, not here? like if you tell people "I hope you have content by eod" if they're scum, they become aware...In post 1751, skitter30 wrote:i'm just hoping that you'll have some content before eod
I mean i want them to be aware ...In post 1753, Andante wrote:feels like a d2 thing to talk about, not here? like if you tell people "I hope you have content by eod" if they're scum, they become aware...In post 1751, skitter30 wrote:i'm just hoping that you'll have some content before eod
I'm hoping so too. And yes I'll take a look at SA's wall.In post 1751, skitter30 wrote:And i do understand the holiday weekend, i'm just hoping that you'll have some content before eod
i thought this part ^^ was kinda townie, like i can sorta see the "i mindmelded with this person previous game, now i'm not, scum?" but like, he doesn't do *much* to push that forward so that is kind of diminished then i guessIn post 1643, Sleepless Assassin wrote:I'm slightly surprised not to see Datisi have any issue with Innocentvillager. We kind of mind melded on Iconeum after a bad entrance last game even though it took him a little bit to be sure on what he was seeing.
i'm not exactly unwilling, he has fallen off in the recent times obviously, thought i'd need to revisit your reasons for thinking he's scumIn post 1762, Faker wrote:Can people explain why they are unwilling to vote Cakez?
Also sorry if i annoyed youIn post 1739, Something_Smart wrote:Nothing about this is similar to Radio Buzz. I didn't even lurk in that game.
Yeah i'm not sure that bit in particular was ai, just noting that it was bizarre. I take more issue with the iioa + the iv scumread (+ if anyone is interested in doing some homework, take a look at sleepless in ss's recent pyp from like two weeks, and lmk what you think)In post 1760, Faker wrote:Not really sold on coin flipping with Sleepless; iirc the wall was fine. I realize this is funny coming from someone voting Cakez.
I disagree with virtually every word of Skitter's 1705, concurred that the NSG line was strange but didn't find it AI.
I mean i think this is a but of a probelem + scum indicative imoIn post 1763, Datisi wrote:the fact that even after a full read i could not tell you a single Actual Read that sleepless has is problematic, but i'm not quite sure if it's due the post not having any or me just losing focus every three seconds.