^^^^In post 2017, Datisi wrote:baltar didn't crumb his n1 action, he crashed a truck full of bread
this role only makes sense if we yeet a vigilante on day 1 and he gets to shoot night 1In post 1219, Almost50 wrote:It's damn strange we only had ONE death overnight. I was a "Town N1 Backup Vig".
I don’t know man. I’m struggling with it I’m not going to lie.In post 2025, Datisi wrote:^^^^In post 2017, Datisi wrote:baltar didn't crumb his n1 action, he crashed a truck full of bread
it doesn't have to be an ascetic or commuter. it might be a blocking role. other than vpb (who can get clears) we also have a vigilante in town. i don't think it's outside the realm of possibility that scumfucks have a roleblocker or jailkeeper or whatever.
and no, the slot is already claimed as a n1 vig backup or some bs like that
In post 2000, House wrote:VP inno'd A50 (which we now know is legit), of course he was the nk.
Wait seriously. I assumed right away VP lied about the inno and was the vig kill and OutworldER was the NK because scum read OutWorldER as pr. Sorry dats I guess you weren't insane for wondering (unless I am also insane.)In post 1997, Datisi wrote:am i insane for thinking that baltar might be the nightkill and the outworld kill might be a vig shot? because it's either that, or baltar died visiting someone last night, and scum killed outworld, and like... i don't know why scum kills outworld there...
Giving me chubs with your votes won't change my mind.
If scum have a roleblocker or jailkeeper, VP would still be alive to continue singing scumBlade's inno.In post 2025, Datisi wrote:^^^^In post 2017, Datisi wrote:baltar didn't crumb his n1 action, he crashed a truck full of bread
it doesn't have to be an ascetic or commuter. it might be a blocking role. other than vpb (who can get clears) we also have a vigilante in town. i don't think it's outside the realm of possibility that scumfucks have a roleblocker or jailkeeper or whatever.
and no, the slot is already claimed as a n1 vig backup or some bs like that
You’ve been wrong all game and continue to be wrong.
I'll just claim a different role every page if there's a mass claim.In post 2033, Datisi wrote:my hottest of hot takes is that scum is math + 1 out of s_s and iv and that this whole fight is going to be a huge waste of time
i am also debating a massclaim because if the town's power levels are too high, it gets more and more likely scum has a blocking role
We all have our niche.In post 2034, Andresvmb wrote:You’ve been wrong all game and continue to be wrong.
math is smarter than that - IF he's scum, they blocked vp n1, and vp started screaming how math is town (+ vp's "if i die kill a50), i don't think it's a reach to say that scum figured out vp is something with a weak modifierIn post 2032, House wrote:If scum have a roleblocker or jailkeeper, VP would still be alive to continue singing scumBlade's inno.
All the same, the correct time to worry about the possibility of a false inno is... idk, not now. Later.In post 2037, Datisi wrote:math is smarter than that - IF he's scum, they blocked vp n1, and vp started screaming how math is town (+ vp's "if i die kill a50), i don't think it's a reach to say that scum figured out vp is something with a weak modifierIn post 2032, House wrote:If scum have a roleblocker or jailkeeper, VP would still be alive to continue singing scumBlade's inno.
if they then leave vp alive, it makes it so that vp likely gets what he thinks is a clear, and that shrinks the yeet pool
this way, they lock the "inno" in and can just attack anyone who dares to suggest it's a false negative
Which would be NAI coming from him, but you're probably right.In post 2039, Datisi wrote:because i 100% guarantee you that math is going to enter this game screaming how i am scum for trying to suggest the clear is false
unless you have an extra shot (don't answer that), we have one misyeet before myloIn post 2038, House wrote:All the same, the correct time to worry about the possibility of a false inno is... idk, not now. Later.
Read this and tell me this is coming from Town. I’m “wrong” and therefore I’m Scum?! What? And RTP was wrong about VPB - doesn’t make them any less Town. And RTPIn post 2030, Frogsterking wrote:In post 2000, House wrote:VP inno'd A50 (which we now know is legit), of course he was the nk.Wait seriously. I assumed right away VP lied about the inno and was the vig kill and OutworldER was the NK because scum read OutWorldER as pr. Sorry dats I guess you weren't insane for wondering (unless I am also insane.)In post 1997, Datisi wrote:am i insane for thinking that baltar might be the nightkill and the outworld kill might be a vig shot? because it's either that, or baltar died visiting someone last night, and scum killed outworld, and like... i don't know why scum kills outworld there...
RTP said andres is supposed to be good in the endgame and gets fearkilled a lot and andres is wrong here so I'm just going to OMGus him.
VOTE: andres
I don't really buy his argument that he sees a scum motivation in those posts of mine he links, I think I look pretty townie aside from the skitter hammer.
My rationale may be absurd but at least it's rational, andres rationale is that absurd = scummy therefore frogs is scum.In post 2034, Andresvmb wrote:You’ve been wrong all game and continue to be wrong.
@Frogsterking - I don’t think you’re Scum for OMGUS’ing me (I’m well beyond believing that only Scum do that), but your rationale for pushing me is absurd.
You're so right.In post 2046, Frogsterking wrote:My rationale may be absurd but at least it's rational, andres rationale is that absurd = scummy therefore frogs is scum.In post 2034, Andresvmb wrote:You’ve been wrong all game and continue to be wrong.
@Frogsterking - I don’t think you’re Scum for OMGUS’ing me (I’m well beyond believing that only Scum do that), but your rationale for pushing me is absurd.
Nah andres hide all game and then push a townie on D3 with no tones of uncertainty. I guess Math was right about the "1 scum on wagon" thing.In post 2042, Andresvmb wrote:Read this and tell me this is coming from Town. I’m “wrong” and therefore I’m Scum?! What? And RTP was wrong about VPB - doesn’t make them any less Town. And RTPIn post 2030, Frogsterking wrote:In post 2000, House wrote:VP inno'd A50 (which we now know is legit), of course he was the nk.Wait seriously. I assumed right away VP lied about the inno and was the vig kill and OutworldER was the NK because scum read OutWorldER as pr. Sorry dats I guess you weren't insane for wondering (unless I am also insane.)In post 1997, Datisi wrote:am i insane for thinking that baltar might be the nightkill and the outworld kill might be a vig shot? because it's either that, or baltar died visiting someone last night, and scum killed outworld, and like... i don't know why scum kills outworld there...
RTP said andres is supposed to be good in the endgame and gets fearkilled a lot and andres is wrong here so I'm just going to OMGus him.
VOTE: andres
I don't really buy his argument that he sees a scum motivation in those posts of mine he links, I think I look pretty townie aside from the skitter hammer.isa stronger Town player than I am.
This isn’t even remotely accurate. It’s like you haven’t even bothered reading what I actually wrote and are grabbing onto the last thing I wrote. I’m calling your case against me absurd because it is. You’re making an argument based on proficiency that is extreme. You’re acknowledging that you’ve made moves that could be considered to be Scummy, and yet I’m supposed to ignore everything you’ve done because I can read tone and intention perfectly. How is that rational?In post 2046, Frogsterking wrote:My rationale may be absurd but at least it's rational, andres rationale is that absurd = scummy therefore frogs is scum.In post 2034, Andresvmb wrote:You’ve been wrong all game and continue to be wrong.
@Frogsterking - I don’t think you’re Scum for OMGUS’ing me (I’m well beyond believing that only Scum do that), but your rationale for pushing me is absurd.
