I know I said I check here tomorrow but couldn't resist
In post 867, HockeyFan wrote:jfc too many posts, too much reading,
I was able to read it like 2 times but omfg
Anyways,
The only thing I understood from frozens pov was
754, and even then i'm not understanding what u mean by this. whose slot does nero have "more" info on? He still thinks im scum but is hesistant to vote me for my claim. Wheres the extra info in that?
the rest is mechanics disucssion, talking about how my claim is the "easiest" to make and its stupid
Frzoen, iirc during that entire interaction, u kept on mentuoning how u "analyzed" my claim so; what exactly did u anaylze? All ive seen u say is " my claim half done and is not verifiable but It lines up with the rest of his "goofy" play, so hes null" ???? U just beat around the bush for that read rofl
Also as for nero, at a first glance, thier posts seem pretty towny, they have a consistent mindset(I think), but ik they have a lot of experience so shrug probs just a null to a town lean
I literally explained everything like 10 times. from what is my read on you, what I meant by goofy, why I cum read nero, what was my take on your read (which is practically not at all what you just said even in slightest, that was the part nero was taking out of context repeatedly to claim how our reads were similar)
there is literally nothing in this post of yours that is actually even remotely related to whatever I posted in past 24 hours and it kinda pisses me off to a point cause regardless of your alignment you could actually try to read and then comment
and no that tiny irrelivent part I mentioned is not stupid. You had no reason to claim when you did and with what you did, as your claim means nothing. a back up is literally a VT at this point of game so there is literally no justification to even call you a power role. that + how you didn't even claim what kind of role you're backing up. claiming backup theoretically leaves a scum player open to adjust their claim based on later on flips so they can claim results that will confuse town. for example claiming a back up cop after a cop flips giving out a red claim on a mafia player and getting partner eliminated. it practically leaves a mafia to adjust their claim to whatever comes next. What you claimed mechanically is the easiest fake claim a mafia can do.
As for your question about the info I claimed nero has, he has been calling you mafia, dodging the tension of your wagon with that sentence that I got fixated on and called terrible that started whole thing and then shifted his vote on me the moment I called him out on it after few posts of shading leading up to it. He never ever ever expressed any sort of read on my slot beside his vote, which was a direct reaction to me calling him out on it. and the reason he went on that direction was because he was trying to imply during this day "we did exact similar things" (he was trying to say my reaction and his was same to your claim and to eye's theory) which is the most absurd reason to vote someone. Nero is not in experienced. Nero doesn't play like that as town
so nero's push on my slot is fake and his dodges of the most attention wagons of the day to jump on me comes from his informed position. all these stuff said Nero should be mafia.
In post 866, Greeting wrote:@
Frozen Angel
don't use the l-word to refer to voting out a player. It's banned. Use "eliminate" instead.
and sorry about that. I tried to use elimination everytime I remembered but its old habits and I just came back after years to this website. I'll do my best
and sorry that I couldn't keep this brief