Nice attempt to redirect the conversation.In post 1592, the worst wrote:god forbid I developed readsIn post 1587, Greeting wrote:Oh, I skimmed the first half of your ISO and found nothing of the sort, so I knew this was not true.In post 1581, the worst wrote:you didn't read it did you
I think theres something really insincere about you claiming to be falling behind because you're overwhelmed, when all of your posting is kinda sheep tepid takes which you're presenting as your own
I also just tried to do a read list and realised I'd literally kill more than half of the plist without blinking lol
this is my issue with you
you're clearly not reading with intent to solve
all of your reads are sluggish and consensus
yet you still want to come off it looking like you're solving
your characterisation of your wagon doesn't make sense from someone who read the wagon. it makes perfect sense from someone who lazily checked the vc, and then applied their current reads to their expectation of the wagon.
Your issue which you clearly developed only when
You little scumster. I hope town will be in a mood for fried duck Day 2.