Oh, no!
VOTE: megazumarill
I can bearly stand it
Oh, no!
You think Mala putting an RVS vote on you is something they would actually care enough about to not do as scum?In post 12, MathBlade wrote:So Mala is prob town.
I don’t see Mala scum poking me out of the gate.
I think Toog might be in need of a jab here.
VOTE: Toog
Semi serious vote as more votes than probable scum size are in this setup so Toog can’t genuinely believe that statement. Yet Toog doesn’t vote anyone or move the game along.
Neither.In post 28, Vanderscamp wrote:Math, do you legit think that making an RVS vote vs not is actually an indication of someone being scum or is this just a policy vote?
It’s okayIn post 23, MegAzumarill wrote:I'm not a bear though I'm a rabbitIn post 18, Toogeloo wrote:Don't forget MegA.
In post 30, MathBlade wrote:Neither.In post 28, Vanderscamp wrote:Math, do you legit think that making an RVS vote vs not is actually an indication of someone being scum or is this just a policy vote?
It would have been fine if Toog had done just some bear pun and left it alone.
It’s more that Toog said something that resembled content that is logically impossible that pinged me.
In post 10, Toogeloo wrote:Anyone who isn't voting me out the gate didn't get a town PM.
What kind of attention do you think Mala would expect to get from you from an RVS vote?In post 31, MathBlade wrote:In other words it looks like poorly faked content versus just an RVS vote.
I don’t think Mala intentionally wants attention from me if she’s scum.
It seems not like her.
Granted these are RVS reads but I am confident enough to state them to get the ball rolling somewhere.
Just Math being Math.In post 34, Vanderscamp wrote:To me this seems like clearly a joke based on their avatar.
Yeah, in some mini normal we were both in, I remember Math putting forth some weird logic to get the game out of rvs. I'm not reading into it.In post 36, Toogeloo wrote:Just Math being Math.In post 34, Vanderscamp wrote:To me this seems like clearly a joke based on their avatar.
Does he do this stuff as both alignments?In post 39, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Yeah, in some mini normal we were both in, I remember Math putting forth some weird logic to get the game out of rvs. I'm not reading into it.In post 36, Toogeloo wrote:Just Math being Math.In post 34, Vanderscamp wrote:To me this seems like clearly a joke based on their avatar.
This is the fifth vote on Toog. Bringing someone to L-2 on post 37 without so much as a comment (even just one saying that it's L-2) is not the best look.
You're right, sorry.In post 42, momo wrote:This is the fifth vote on Toog. Bringing someone to L-2 on post 37 without so much as a comment (even just one saying that it's L-2) is not the best look.
It’s a huge risk that I just tunnel her if she doesn’t do it right.In post 35, Vanderscamp wrote:What kind of attention do you think Mala would expect to get from you from an RVS vote?In post 31, MathBlade wrote:In other words it looks like poorly faked content versus just an RVS vote.
I don’t think Mala intentionally wants attention from me if she’s scum.
It seems not like her.
Granted these are RVS reads but I am confident enough to state them to get the ball rolling somewhere.
I dislike this entire exchange from 39->41.In post 41, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Oh idk I've only played the one game with him, and he was town there. So like, it's at least not wholly scum indicative.
Momo and Roden is probably TvT.In post 43, Roden wrote:You're right, sorry.In post 42, momo wrote:This is the fifth vote on Toog. Bringing someone to L-2 on post 37 without so much as a comment (even just one saying that it's L-2) is not the best look.
VOTE: Momo
This is E-5.
I mean mathematically you're right but why do you think so?In post 46, MathBlade wrote:Momo and Roden is probably TvT.In post 43, Roden wrote:You're right, sorry.In post 42, momo wrote:This is the fifth vote on Toog. Bringing someone to L-2 on post 37 without so much as a comment (even just one saying that it's L-2) is not the best look.
VOTE: Momo
This is E-5.
I dislike it too but I get where momo is coming from.In post 47, MegAzumarill wrote:I mean mathematically you're right but why do you think so?In post 46, MathBlade wrote:Momo and Roden is probably TvT.In post 43, Roden wrote:You're right, sorry.In post 42, momo wrote:This is the fifth vote on Toog. Bringing someone to L-2 on post 37 without so much as a comment (even just one saying that it's L-2) is not the best look.
VOTE: Momo
This is E-5.
I actually dislike that post by momo quite a bit